Angela Bowman
  • Female
  • Chicago, IL
  • United States
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Share
  • Featured Blogs
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Groups (6)
  • Photos (4)
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Angela Bowman's Friends

  • Aaron Lund
  • John M. McCarthy Sr.
  • John Porterfield
  • Tom White

Angela Bowman's Groups

 

Angela Bowman's Page

Profile Information

Company
NEST: Sustainable Homes Inside and Out
Professional Interests
Writer and editor: 17 years in educational publishing and instructional design; 2 years blogging about sustainability for homeowners.

Landlord: owner of drafty Victorian two-flat; manager and energy-efficiency improver of same.
Website URL
http://nestblog.typepad.com
Twitter ID
AngelaMBowman
LinkedIn Profile
http://www.linkedin.com/in/angelamariebowman

Angela Bowman's Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

At 2:31pm on April 7, 2011, Aaron Lund said…

Your'e question is a few months old, so I don't know if its still relevant:

 

"Wondering about hydronic vs. straight electric baseboard heaters: which is more energy efficient?"

 

I'll give my two cents anyway. 

 

The electric baseboard heaters will be 100% efficient.  No energy is wasted by an electric resistance coil.  Unfortunately, the electricity generating process is only about 35% efficient.  A lot of energy is wasted at the power plant and along the transmission lines. Also, electric heat is typically around 3 times as expensive as natural gas heat.

 

A hydronic heater (which requires a boiler) will be approximately 80% to 90% efficient, depending on the quality of the boiler you purchase.  There may be some minor additional inefficiencies if hot water lines aren't well insulated when passing through unconditioned spaces, etc. 

 

Taking into account the energy losses that occur during electricity generation and transmission, I would say that the hydronic system will be more efficient.  Please note, none of my analysis includes the energy required for extraction and refining, which applies to both electricity and gas.  I'm assuming the front end energy used for extraction is similar for both energy sources.

 

Hope this helps.  I would go with the hydronic system.  It might cost more to install than an electric system, but its cheaper to operate, and I don't like feeling like I can't do anything about the large amounts of electricity wasted before it even reaches my home.

At 2:14pm on April 7, 2011, Aaron Lund said…

Hey Angela,

Sorry for the delayed response.  This is my first time actually logging in here (except to join).  The new job is going great.  I'm really working exclusively on commercial buildings now.  I kind of miss working on homes.

I'm gonna go check out your blog.

At 2:19pm on November 5, 2010, Tom White said…
Angela--welcome to Home Energy Pros. It's good to see you here. Thanks for joining the conversation. Tom
 
 
 

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

Amber Vignieri posted a blog post
3 hours ago
ofer ben -nathan added a discussion to the group HVAC
11 hours ago
ofer ben -nathan joined Allison A. Bailes III's group
Thumbnail

HVAC

HVAC design, Manuals J, S, T, & D, Duct leakage, Air flow, ENERGY STAR new home requirements,…See More
11 hours ago
Mary Knox replied to Kim Tanner's discussion Game of Homes
"Sounds interesting. I will definitely try it."
12 hours ago
Judy Roberson joined Norm Bourassa's group
Thumbnail

Multifamily Buildings

For too long there has been relatively little EE focus on multifamily, but some new programs have…See More
17 hours ago
Peter Cantone liked Tom White's blog post Energy Raters and Builders Raise the Bar for Home Performance at RESNET’s Building Performance Conference
yesterday
Diane Chojnowski's 6 events were featured
yesterday
Diane Chojnowski posted events
yesterday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service