Energy Upgrade Calif. Whole House Assessment Marketing Video

Learn more about the Whole House Assessment at www.sce.com/upgrade.

Views: 222

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by Dennis Heidner on December 14, 2013 at 11:14pm

TeddKidd, 

The style of advertisement they are using - is now pretty common.  It uses combines basically three different "important" items into one short sound bite -- aiming to capture the viewer from multiple angles... 

1.  The ad talks about money,

2. The ad talks about comfort

3.  The ad talks about health.

You see the same ads all the time combining those items for cars and other consumer products.  They do it because one ad covers the husband/wife and they can connect to it emotionally.

The ad doesn't promise any money - it promotes the idea that piece meal energy improvements are not as good as a comprehensive audit and improvement plan.  Some of the complaints you have against California energy programs -- were a result of those piece meal improvements.

I see the ads as trying to make people think about comprehensive solutions - not just going to a big box store and buying a few lightbulbs -- then wonder why they haven't seen a change on their electric bill.

Remember - if you look at the EIA stats... 14% of the California homes do not have heat.  Not needed.  So promoting heating improvements doesn't work.  But some of those same homes may have in window air conditioning units,  or un-vented bathrooms,  or frequently kitchens that use a gas appliance.  

On this web site in some of the "horror" -- I can't believe they did that... you can see some really "intelligent" solutions that have been used for hot water heating and clothes washing -- installing the appliances outside of the house in unprotected - and rather shoddy installations.   They worked (sort of) because the climate is mild,  first earthquake or nasty storm and the building is toast.. because of the poor work quality (a DIY installation).  The EUC PR - would bring -- I hope -- bring some intelligence to the picture...

Comment by tedkidd on December 14, 2013 at 10:12pm
Dennis,

I think about numbers like that as esoteric, arbitrary, and PR pomp. What I think is more important is whether individual promises to individual people deliver to expectations because if they don't, people are out of pocket the saving that were supposed to help pay for the improvements, which in California case is two out of every three cents. I just don't think claims of obscure megawatt reductions justify a giant fraud perpetrated on the public. I suspect you don't either.
Comment by Dennis Heidner on December 14, 2013 at 7:41pm

TedKidd,

Perhaps you need to look at what the average MWh/yr per consumption by state...  California has reduced the average statewide consumption to under 6MWh/yr...  over about a 30 year period.  Louisiana is running about 18MWh/yr...

I am in Washington State...  not California...

http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/reports/2009/state_brief...

http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/reports/2009/state_brief...

Comment by tedkidd on December 13, 2013 at 8:45am

DRIVERS:

Health issues.

Comfort - grossly oversized blasting heat. 

LISTEN MUCH??  

EUC PR pitch predominantly talks money savings, even though the consumers NEVER stated that savings was a factor much less primary driver.  So these people running the program still completely miss the point and come from a perverted perspective of what matters.  

No wonder California's program is poster child for most expensive and least effective - crappiest in the nation.  Too much kumbaya singing, pot smoking, green washing back patting doo gooders, and not enough realistic folks with LISTENING and rational thinking skills.  They're not packaging EE to meet consumer interests, they're packaging it to meet their doo gooder needs and what they THINK is important to consumers.      

And as long as they think "savings" is the driver they will overstate savings and California will continue to be  poster child for crappiest program in the country- with an absurd program cost in the 5 digit area and consumer realized savings at a super low 30¢ on the dollar promised, (not that other state averages of 50¢ aren't something deserving of great shame)  

http://bit.ly/VTsucksToo

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

Crosbey Archery liked Crosbey Archery's blog post How to improve the air quality in your home ?
yesterday
Crosbey Archery replied to Don Hynek's discussion Testing "Magic Pak" units?? in the group Multifamily Buildings
"second-floor (and higher) units without humping a ladder all the way around the building is a very…"
yesterday
Colin Genge posted events
yesterday
Profile IconJon Turnbaugh, Lights N More and John Kamas joined Home Energy Pros
yesterday
Amber Vignieri posted a blog post

Relay Network Targets Multifamily Housing Upgrades Nationwide

Affordable apartment buildings are home to more than 10 million American households, making them a…See More
yesterday
Tom White's video was featured

Robby Schwarz on Builder Collaboration

Hear Robby Schwarz, of EnergyLogic discuss the value Owens Corning brings to Thrive Home Builders.
Friday
Crosbey Archery liked Don Hynek's discussion Testing "Magic Pak" units??
Friday
Crosbey Archery joined Norm Bourassa's group
Thumbnail

Multifamily Buildings

For too long there has been relatively little EE focus on multifamily, but some new programs have…See More
Friday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service