Energy Upgrade Calif. Whole House Assessment Marketing Video

Learn more about the Whole House Assessment at www.sce.com/upgrade.

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by Dennis Heidner on December 14, 2013 at 11:14pm

TeddKidd, 

The style of advertisement they are using - is now pretty common.  It uses combines basically three different "important" items into one short sound bite -- aiming to capture the viewer from multiple angles... 

1.  The ad talks about money,

2. The ad talks about comfort

3.  The ad talks about health.

You see the same ads all the time combining those items for cars and other consumer products.  They do it because one ad covers the husband/wife and they can connect to it emotionally.

The ad doesn't promise any money - it promotes the idea that piece meal energy improvements are not as good as a comprehensive audit and improvement plan.  Some of the complaints you have against California energy programs -- were a result of those piece meal improvements.

I see the ads as trying to make people think about comprehensive solutions - not just going to a big box store and buying a few lightbulbs -- then wonder why they haven't seen a change on their electric bill.

Remember - if you look at the EIA stats... 14% of the California homes do not have heat.  Not needed.  So promoting heating improvements doesn't work.  But some of those same homes may have in window air conditioning units,  or un-vented bathrooms,  or frequently kitchens that use a gas appliance.  

On this web site in some of the "horror" -- I can't believe they did that... you can see some really "intelligent" solutions that have been used for hot water heating and clothes washing -- installing the appliances outside of the house in unprotected - and rather shoddy installations.   They worked (sort of) because the climate is mild,  first earthquake or nasty storm and the building is toast.. because of the poor work quality (a DIY installation).  The EUC PR - would bring -- I hope -- bring some intelligence to the picture...

Comment by tedkidd on December 14, 2013 at 10:12pm
Dennis,

I think about numbers like that as esoteric, arbitrary, and PR pomp. What I think is more important is whether individual promises to individual people deliver to expectations because if they don't, people are out of pocket the saving that were supposed to help pay for the improvements, which in California case is two out of every three cents. I just don't think claims of obscure megawatt reductions justify a giant fraud perpetrated on the public. I suspect you don't either.
Comment by Dennis Heidner on December 14, 2013 at 7:41pm

TedKidd,

Perhaps you need to look at what the average MWh/yr per consumption by state...  California has reduced the average statewide consumption to under 6MWh/yr...  over about a 30 year period.  Louisiana is running about 18MWh/yr...

I am in Washington State...  not California...

http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/reports/2009/state_brief...

http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/reports/2009/state_brief...

Comment by tedkidd on December 13, 2013 at 8:45am

DRIVERS:

Health issues.

Comfort - grossly oversized blasting heat. 

LISTEN MUCH??  

EUC PR pitch predominantly talks money savings, even though the consumers NEVER stated that savings was a factor much less primary driver.  So these people running the program still completely miss the point and come from a perverted perspective of what matters.  

No wonder California's program is poster child for most expensive and least effective - crappiest in the nation.  Too much kumbaya singing, pot smoking, green washing back patting doo gooders, and not enough realistic folks with LISTENING and rational thinking skills.  They're not packaging EE to meet consumer interests, they're packaging it to meet their doo gooder needs and what they THINK is important to consumers.      

And as long as they think "savings" is the driver they will overstate savings and California will continue to be  poster child for crappiest program in the country- with an absurd program cost in the 5 digit area and consumer realized savings at a super low 30¢ on the dollar promised, (not that other state averages of 50¢ aren't something deserving of great shame)  

http://bit.ly/VTsucksToo

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Hal Skinner replied to Kurt Shafer's discussion Where can I find the best radiant barrier to install under my roof?
"I just posted a statement and pictures of a home in Yuma AZ.  This is one I did 10 years…"
11 hours ago
Hal Skinner added a discussion to the group The RCC Classroom (Radiant Control Coatings)
12 hours ago
Tom Mallard replied to Kurt Shafer's discussion Where can I find the best radiant barrier to install under my roof?
"Anything done to raise the roofing off the sheathing works to reduce the high temperatures in the…"
14 hours ago
Michael Dunseith posted a photo

http://www.prattcenter.net/energy-champions-launch-party

Senator Kevin Parker poses with Pratt Center's Green Jobs Green New York Project Coordinator Elana…
20 hours ago
Michael Dunseith posted a status
20 hours ago
Rob Madden, Solar Home Broker posted a blog post

Phoenix 3rd Quarter Solar Resale Statistics Continue to Impress

Phoenix solar home sales were up during the third quarter of 2014, including the resale of homes…See More
yesterday
Everblue posted a status
"Green job alert! Energy Auditor in Baltimore, MD with Advanced Green Home Solutions. Check it out: http://bit.ly/1xhQuXO"
yesterday
Chris Clay replied to Isaiah Borel's discussion Blown Cellulose VS Blown Fiberglass in the Attic
"The Cold Climate Housing Research Center in Fairbanks, AK has alot of information about this…"
yesterday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service