Thankfully more and more new homes in Ontario are being 3rd party airtightness tested. Some do it to comply with EnerGuide80, some builders want to distinguish their build quality by having it ‘pass’ an air test or to meet a branded standard like EnergySTAR and many, surprisingly, still don’t get tested at all. Understandably many builders and architects are nervous about having their work tested, especially if it’s their first time, but working with a reputable Certified Energy Auditors (CEA) should allay those concerns if you approach the build systematically.

…I’ll huff and puff and blow your house down!

The truth is we’re not out to get you. Most CEAs share the builder’s desire to ensure better quality. In fact, many CEAs have been testing houses of all shapes sizes for many years and should be considered an asset. Over the past year, we’ve been working successfully with a handful of the best architect firms in the design phase to help iron out weak envelope details in the early design stages. We find the best results are realised through the Integrated Design Process (IDP) as all the key players come together early in the design phase to contribute expertise and share knowledge about the project well before ground is broken.

 

What’s an ACH50?

The conditioned air volume of the house, including the partition walls and floor cavities, are all part of the heated air volume of the house.  The “Air Changes per hour” (ACH) refers to how many times this equivalent whole air volume will be pushed out through the blower door at 50 Pascals of pressure difference between inside and outside the house. Century old homes generally leak air well over 10ACH and will lose more heat by air leakage than they do through the walls, whereas a new house under 3 ACH is considered “air tight” to the point of needing mechanical ventilation. The Passive House (PH) test method is different (pesky Germans!) in that it includes the conditioned air volume the volume occupied by the thickness of the exterior walls too.

 

Setting the bar

Most new houses can achieve air tightness levels of 2.5 – 4 ACH50 without putting a lot of attention to air barrier detailing. Most builders who take pride and know what to look for can hit 2 ACH fairly consistently. If you’re planning to have a house tested for the first time, consider talking to a CEA who can coach you along the way so that expectations are met, especially if you’re aiming to get under 2ACH. If aiming for anything lower than 2ACH, consider having he house tested BEFORE the drywall goes on. The EnergySTAR standard sets the bar at 2.0ACH or less, whereas the R2000 standard sets it’s minimum air leakage at 1.5ACH. The Passive House (PH) has the most stringent standard set at a mere 0.6ACH*.

 

Not all tests are alike

Broadly speaking there are two types of air tightness tests; an “As Is” and a “Canadian General Standards Board” AKA a “CGSB” test. The test is identical except that in the later, all intentional openings (fireplace flues, HRV vents, etc) are sealed up and as a consequence these test results are lower than ‘As Is’ tests. R2000, EnergyStar, HERS all require a CGSB test. EnerGuide tests are “As Is” test that are mostly done by depressurising the air from in the house, but can also be pressurised too. The PH test requires both a depressurisation and a pressurisation test to rule out bias due to unsealed flaps (clamp that seam!) in the air barrier.

 

It’s my first time…

On test day, some builders zip around nervously taping and sealing up joints in the air barrier, while others are resigned to a “let the chips fall where they may” attitude. The greatest opportunity for the builder is to have the site super and trades shadow the CEA during the test so they learn what to look for and how to treat the air barrier the next time they puncture a hole in it. The most common leakage points include missing attic hatches, doors without weather-strips, penetration leaks at the rim joists, fireplaces, and cold storage door frames that aren’t tied to the rough opening.

 

Preparing for the test…

If you’re doing a pre-drywall test, then the pressure’s off and you can note leaks by following the CEA around and seal them at your leisure later on. Ideally in pre-drywall tests, the sheathing on the outside of the house is the air barrier and if not acts as one to keep the volume of air leaking through walls low enough to prevent the poly from zipping off the walls. Ideally all ceilings to be insulated have their poly either supported by drywall, strips of resilient channel or 1”x3” strapping. If it’s the final test, then ensure all windows are cleaned and adjusted so they close and seal properly.

 

Occupancy

With careful attention to details, most tests go according to plan. Some tests don’t meet the target, but in most cases it’s due to obvious fixes, but some require extensive repairs and it is sad to see freshly painted drywall being ripped open to repair the envelop in a new house. The silver lining is that the occupant gets a higher quality product that’s more comfortable and cheaper to condition. As stated previously, hire and experienced consultant that can walk you through the process and check in periodically to ensure the target is within reach.

 

Come to our inaugural “High Performance Home Workshop” series!

On February 26th at 7PM, BGG will host a workshop covering the air barrier details that need to be addressed in order to successfully achieve the desired air tightness goal set out in the planning stages. It will be held at our offices on Spadina Ave at 7PM.

*This target air leakage rate was set for a multitude of good reasons. It is achievable, it cuts energy loss, increased envelope durability and it the level at which most PH designed homes can supply heat through mere ventilation ducts.

Views: 191

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Sean Lintow Sr replied to Bud Poll's discussion Basing air exchange on house volume??
"Sorry Bud but I think you need to clarify your issues with using volumes to calculate ACH As for…"
3 hours ago
Profile IconWes Anderson, Jean-Paul and Bryan joined Home Energy Pros
Friday
Dennis Heidner commented on Dale Stephens's blog post LED Lighting 24-month update 18,240 hours & counting
"Dale, good write up. For the landscaping bulbs,  if they had been T3 12V wedge bulbs,  I…"
Friday
Brett Little commented on Tom White's video
Thumbnail

The Future of Housing - And How Airtightness Can Help

"It's very true! So many people and contractors have tons of insulated attics but no air seal…"
Thursday
Chris Leach replied to Richard Beyer's discussion "The Dangers of Using Spray Foam Insulation"
"The problems will surface soon enough . Why don't we take a second look at this over rated…"
Thursday
Don Fitchett commented on Tom White's video
Thursday
tedkidd replied to Bob Blanchette's discussion How does Cycles Per Hour affect real world AFUE?
"Want to spot a simpleton? It's a guy who thinks EE and comfort are disconnected.  Want…"
Thursday
tedkidd commented on Tom White's blog post Clean Energy Works Oregon: Total Home Performance
"Nice post Tom! I really like how he puts that. Leveraging interests so they can optimize…"
Thursday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service