A homeowner was referred to me as someone who might be able to help him solve a serious moisture problem in his home here in Central New York.  The caller’s home started out in the 1950s as what we near the Adirondacks refer to as a “camp,” but it had been greatly expanded and improved over the years, and such places are often really lovely.

 

He mentioned that the moisture problem is so severe that he has a commercial dehumidifier going 24/7/365 (366 in leap year), and he “sometimes opens all the doors to let the humidity out.”

 

“I see,” was the only thing I could possibly say.

 

My next move was to explain that I would need to visit the site and do a thorough evaluation in order to come up with what he could do to take control of the moisture level.  Once we had met and discussed the situation, I would provide him with a detailed written workscope to resolve his issues (God willing and the creek don’t rise).  This service would cost $X up front.

 

“$X!!!!” he exclaimed.  “Yes, sir," I replied. (My ear is still ringing a little bit.)

Once he stopped spluttering, he continued: “Now you’re going to do one of those tests with the big fan, right?” 

 

“Well, Sir,” I replied, “the blower door determines how much air leakage there is, and where those leaks are located.  In your case, we are looking for sources of moisture.  Based upon your description of what’s going on, I believe that the primary culprit is liquid water rather than air-borne water vapor.  My first step is to determine why there is so much moisture that a commercial dehumidifier does not control it.”

 

“But I need one of those air exchanger things,” he grumped. 

 

“I’ll be happy to come up and go over all this with you,” I said.

 

“$X and no big fan??  I’ll get back to you.”

 

Click.

 

I’m surprised in retrospect that he never asked if I was going to bring an infrared camera.

 

Views: 192

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by Bud Poll on November 29, 2013 at 8:42am

Darn I love a challenge, but Colin is correct, unless you can take control of what you need to do it would be a mistake to guess with less.  A blower door is to us just as a stethoscope is to a doctor.  It lets us check the building's respiration and get to the heart of the problem.

The BD and IR also have a lot of additional benefits, but not sure he would be receptive to hear about them.

Be sure and let us know if you take on the job.

Bud

Comment by Colin Genge on November 28, 2013 at 2:36pm

Your response was totally reasonable and your clients was not.  Yet, how would he have reacted to a challenge from you something like "well so far you've spent about $xxxx dollars per year in wasted energy and if you don't get the job right, it may cost you another $xxx, xxx to rescue your rotted out walls so I guess it depends on how you look at the value. Some customers need to be challenged. 

Comment by Georg Reichard on November 8, 2013 at 10:02am

Thanks for sharing your story - entertaining (though admittedly not for you) and I believe very representative in regard to the misconception of "popular" equipment. I will share this with my students ...

... regarding infrared camera: there is actually an application for this. If you have bulk water intruding, e.g. under a floor or dripping into a wall etc., you can detect the actual occurrence of water with an infrared camera. If there is real water (and not only moisture) involved, there's typically some evaporation going on along the edges, which will show up as small colder(!) bands, where it actually gets warmer ... this has to do with the local evaporative cooling going on that can only come from water changing into vapor. So yes, there could be a use for the infrared camera - but I'd still leave the blower door at home ...

Best,

Georg 

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

Sean Lintow Sr replied to Larry Nissman's discussion Foam insulation on attic floor
"The insulation job is quite simply a freaking eyesore & mess - with that it shouldn't be…"
3 hours ago
Sean Lintow Sr replied to Melissa Baldridge's discussion IECC 2012 & 2015 Compliance & HRVs
"commercial is 67% efficiency & 2.8 cfm per watt for residential as I recall on 2015 which…"
3 hours ago
Simon added a discussion to the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
Thumbnail

Advice needed please

I'm looking to build my own blower unit for use with the minneapolis system.Please could anyone…See More
6 hours ago
Simon joined Kim Tanner's group
Thumbnail

TEC

Discussion group for The Energy ConservatoryHave a question about residential or big building air…See More
6 hours ago
Rob Madden, Solar Home Broker replied to Rob Madden, Solar Home Broker's discussion Indoor Air Quality Monitors and Meters
"With a Foobot, are you able to recalibrate the sensors?  While I like the price and the…"
19 hours ago
Steve Mann replied to Steve Mann's discussion Eliminator EF400 Smoke Machine in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Yes it is. Steve"
22 hours ago
Laurie DiDonato updated an event
Thumbnail

Become a HERS Rater with the NE HERS Alliance this fall! at Classroom Component at Energize Connecticut Center

September 19, 2016 at 9am to October 21, 2016 at 5pm
Online Component: September 19th-30th - Weekdays 9am-12pm5-Day Classroom/Field Training:October…See More
23 hours ago
Melissa Baldridge posted a discussion

IECC 2012 & 2015 Compliance & HRVs

 I’m failing IECC 2012 with the HRVs we’ve been using – Honeywell .  (See specs below that I…See More
yesterday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service