My opinion on Why Google PowerMeter failed

http://rede3.com/Why_Google_PowerMeter_failed.html

 



Why was the plug pulled on Google PowerMeter?


Google’s philanthropic branch launched Google PowerMeter in February 2009. Its goal was to put the power of seeing electricity usage into the hands of the consumer. The idea was born of a study that showed that those that had access to daily energy data reduced usage by 10 percent. A powerful concept that information delivered could have such a great effect.


I was lucky enough to live in SDG&E territory and smart meters have been installed. I receive a postcard from SDG&E inviting me and 100,000 of my fellow San Diegans to join Google PowerMeter. I also receive emails from the CCSE (http://energycenter.org) so I was in the loop. I installed the software and awaited the launch.


The data was excellent. It would show always on usage so you could see your baseline make changes and see immediate effect which in turn is immediate satisfaction in my estimation. You could look at hourly charts, daily charts, weekly charts, yearly charts. The ability to set goals was also part of the system and you could see when you met these goals with a star designation on that day of your data. I had it on my Google home page and it was up every time I booted up my system as I have Google as my homepage.


All this data for the price of nothing, zilch, nada, neinte, ingting. The price was certainly right. The product performed well. It was available to a large city whose utility promoted the service. With all this going for it why did it fail?


On September 16th 2011 Google pulled the plug on PowerMeter.


A criticism I had right away was that it did not include gas to which is also billed from the same utility with smart meters also installed. How hard would it be to track both and make the tool twice as powerful?


With PowerMeter shuttering its door there are many theories.


Not available on a Universal scale.


The 24 hour lag time and no access to real time data.


The Utilities didn’t want it to succeed and buried it into obscurity


Pressure from Wall Street to stop “wasting money” on unpopular projects


Lack of access by third party developers


Lack of commitment by Google


While I can agree with the first point that it was not available on a large scale out the gate I am not sure that is reason enough for its failure. The immediate data is a good point but does that cause you not to even use it? That the utilities buried it into obscurity sound a bit conspiracy theory like and does not make sense. SDG&E has a watered down version available on the web immediately after Google shuttering its door. It is called Energy Charts and is not as sexy as PowerMeter but is quite good and the data is there. If they are attempting to hide it then why spend money to keep a version of it. I seriously doubt that Wall Street dictates anything to Google. When Wall Street has that power I would suggest you dump your shares if you are holding it. Third party developers felt left out but there is a privacy issue as well. If Google couldn’t give it away where was the market for the third party developers? Google has increased its investment in green technology to over 700 million so far in 2011. That shows a pretty strong commitment to me.


So why did it fail then?


I think the answer is quite simple really. Energy Costs are not painful enough for most to show interest. It is a strange commodity in the sense that every customer is more willing to accept the bill as the part of the cost of living. And we all have to live. While families will often cut back to save for whatever reason the power bill is often overlooked and or the last place they look to save. It seems only the folks who are already interested in saving electricity costs are the ones that signed up to use PowerMeter. According to Wiki, about six percent of SDG&E customers signed up for PowerMeter or a total of 11,000 homes.


I would contend that with a two year run and a six percent penetration the market is clearly apathetic. That apathy, more than anything else is the reason I believe is responsible for the failure of PowerMeter.


Is it all doom and gloom for the energy efficiency market?


Hardly, I will take the half full glass please. 94 percent of the market is out there waiting for the news. It is easy to save on power consumption with the right information. The costs are low and the paybacks fast. Real energy savings work every day and night of the week rain or shine. The house as a system approach leads to a healthier more energy efficient environment where we spend a great deal of time, our home. The market is there undeveloped.







http://www.google.com/powermeter/about/


http://gigaom.com/cleantech/5-reasons-google-powermeter-didnt-take-...


http://theenergycollective.com/petertroast/60281/google-powermeter-...


http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-20074160-54/google-axes-powermete...


http://www.tendrilinc.com/blog/a-fond-farewell-to-google-powermeter...


http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/24/google-energy-idUSN1E75N1...


http://blog.pachube.com/2011/06/how-google-powermeter-got-it-wrong-...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_PowerMeter

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Health-Care-IT/Google-Shuttering-Ailing-Go...

Views: 433

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by Terrye Hunt on September 30, 2011 at 11:05am

Interesting article :Consumer engagement is always an issue and the good news is companies have learned from this experience and are adding significant new positive features for consumers – See PlotWatt, PeoplePower, Eragy…

 

Terrye Hunt

Blueline Innovations Inc.

Comment by Bud Poll on September 25, 2011 at 6:32pm

Hi David,

Well, the last two are ok, but I'll try to gently differ on the first three. 

"It's not a market until there are transactions."  One must perceive a market well in advance of building a business and then praying for those transactions.

"Mere wishing for desirable and sensible things is not demand."  Ah, but it is where demand starts.

"There's no demand for understanding and upgrades without ability to pay."  The WAPs take care of the people who truly cannot pay, plus a great many others.  The rest all have the ability to pay, if they make the right choices.  Getting them to understand those choices that we think they need has been the challenge. A way to pay has always been there, just not free, and that is the danger of baiting the public with free, free, free, they will simply wait for the next best free offer instead of digging into their budget.

Bud

Comment by David Eggleton on September 25, 2011 at 5:34pm

Bud,

It's not a market until there are transactions.

Mere wishing for desirable and sensible things is not demand.

There's no demand for understanding and upgrades without ability to pay.

Sadly, there's less ability to pay every day.

It's good for the fuel companies, I think.

Comment by Bud Poll on September 25, 2011 at 3:00pm

Hi Glen, I like your conclusion and agree we have not excited the market as yet, it's big and it is still out there.  I basically got started in 2000 and ran headlong into the 2000 - 2001 price spike and I can tell you for sure, that got their attention, all be it a painful shot in the pocketbook.  But once the prices went down, so did the wide spread interest in reducing energy costs. 

The magic wand that will motivate the masses is obviously NOT incentive money.  Sure, some are taking what they can, but the pace is too slow (pun intended) and the cost is too high. 

Those of us who work in the energy business tend to think everyone should get excited about saving money and all of the green excuses we can point out, but the reality so far from the masses has been a yawn. Who would have thought that people would be going about their travels as usual with gas prices above $3.00 a gallon, yet here we are.  And home energy costs, they seem to have simply budgeted for the new prices and have gone back to how they were living.

As for real time energy use, it's just a step ahead of itself and not too far into the future we will be watching the meter jump every time we turn on a light, whether we want it or not.  Maybe "lights" was a bad example :).

Bud

 

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Martin Smith joined Hal Skinner's group
Thumbnail

The RCC Classroom (Radiant Control Coatings)

A group where energy professionals can learn about all the different energy saving aspects of…See More
40 minutes ago
Anthony Cox added a discussion to the group Job Board
Thumbnail

PROJECT MANAGER/BUILDING SCIENCE TRAINER Community Housing Partners Christiansburg, VA

We are hiring and below is link to apply for the position we have available at Community Housing…See More
1 hour ago
Anthony Cox joined Diane Chojnowski's group
Thumbnail

Job Board

This group is for posting jobs related to all aspects of the home performance industry including…See More
1 hour ago
Profile IconBrendan Reid, Brian Keech, Bob Reuther and 1 more joined Home Energy Pros
2 hours ago
Hal Skinner added a discussion to the group The RCC Classroom (Radiant Control Coatings)
Thumbnail

Improved acoustics

Some RCCs claim to improve acoustics .  Here are a few examples of ours.…See More
yesterday
Patrick Carter replied to Patrick Carter's discussion Minneapolis Blower Door & Test Equipment for Sale! in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"As of yesterday 09/19/2014, the equipment has been sold..."
Saturday
Hal Skinner replied to Hal Skinner's discussion An example of what an RCC can do with no R- insulation in the walls.
"Mornin Brett. 90 to 85, yes a slight variance there.  Same ASTM test, different scientists,…"
Friday
Bret Curry replied to Hal Skinner's discussion An example of what an RCC can do with no R- insulation in the walls.
"Great information Hal. It appears the thermal emissivity in your test was .85 rather than .90. Are…"
Friday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service