It’s not surprising that a company liked Greenhouse Holdings, which builds eco-friendly infrastructure, would have a thriving California-based operation.  But as John Galt, the company’s executive chairman and founder, told Renewable Energy World magazine, the company is not just focusing on wealthy enclaves to grow its business. Greenhouse Holdings sees opportunity in poor countries, where little energy infrastructure exists, and is entering these markets ahead of the competition.  “We’ve found a niche,” he said.

A recent paper by Clean Energy Group shows that nations like Africa and India serve not only as strong niche markets, but also as incubators to drive down technology costs. Once the prices come down, the technologies can expand into the developed world, opening the way for green energy to at last be fully cost competitive against the entrenched energy infrastructure.

Clean Energy Group explains that this is “reverse innovation,” a term coined by Jeffrey Immelt, General Electric’s CEO and Tuck Business School at Dartmouth in a Harvard Business Review article. It describes the path of not only energy technologies, but other advanced products as well.

“This trend is far removed from purely academic theory. Rather, it is an operating strategy for major global corporations doing business in the developing world, with implications for how climate technology could develop. Put simply, reverse innovation means designing, creating, and manufacturing a product in a developing country. The product may initially be designed to meet developing world demands for lower cost, but  global companies now use this ‘bottom of the pyramid’ market strategy to create products that are later exported to the developed world,” said the CEG paper, Moving Climate Innovation into the 21st Century: Emerging Lessons f...e.

GE’s cheap ($15,000) PC-based ultrasound machine is cited as an example. The company developed the medical device for use in China’s rural outposts where there was no conventional hospital ultrasound. Now the cheaper alternative has made its way to the developed world.

It may seem counter-intuitive but the conditions are often better for scaling up new technologies in poor countries than in rich nations, says the paper.  Here’s why: there is no competition.  Clean tech innovators in the third world are not, for example, trying to make inroads against cheap coal-fired electricity. They are simply providing electricity where there is none; they are filling a market need.

This fits in with the way disruptive technologies often emerge, according to Harvard Business School Professor Clayton Christensen. In the paper, Winning and Losing Bets on Green Technologies, he and co-authors say: “In contrast to wealthy nations where consumption of electricity and gasoline is ubiquitous, developing nations are an ideal place to commercialize green energy technologies. In these countries, there is so much non-consumption that green technologies need only be better than the alternative: nothing.”

In emerging economies, clean energy helps people better accomplish a job they are trying to do. For example, in Africa it’s better to charge your cell phone from a solar panel in your village than be forced to travel hours to the nearest city. In the West, this convenience is readily available through a vast, cheap and easily accessible grid, which is why government intervention is needed to integrate green energy into wealthy countries, the paper says.

The Obama administration is increasing support to US companies that want to export into these emerging niche markets. More details are here.

Elisa Wood has been writing about energy for more than 20 years. See more of her work at www.RealEnergyWriters.com.

Views: 10

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Todd Collins replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"might want to consider vapor permeability.   Need to move the dew point out far enough to…"
1 hour ago
bill lazar replied to robert jones's discussion Should your local weatherization company be required to have someone BPI certified on their staff?
"all this will be clarified soon with the new SWS guidelines mandated by DOE- but just WZ…"
1 hour ago
Glen Gallo replied to Brady Mills's discussion Can someone recommend a whole home water filtration system?
"I was in the business of cleaning up water at one point. We produced spot free pressure washers of…"
3 hours ago
Patrick Michaelyan replied to Casey Gesell's discussion Looking for home improvement companies to join our dealer network!
"Casey I'm in Arlington, VA."
6 hours ago
Patrick Michaelyan replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"Thanks for the input Dennis!"
6 hours ago
Patrick Michaelyan replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"It's about time! I love Hardie products but I had my reservations in the part when installing…"
6 hours ago
Patrick Michaelyan replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"Great, thanks Craig. I read up on Tyvek's Stucco Wrap many moons ago and completely forgot…"
6 hours ago
Dennis Heidner replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"If you are using Hardie on a building,   James Hardie recently released a note that says in…"
7 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service