You’ve almost certainly seen them: a yellow Post-it on the thermostat or a brief note scribbled near the water heater controls, or perhaps a dog-eared card taped to the clothes washer. These are reminders to ourselves (or visitors) about how to operate the device. We call them “folk labels” so as to distinguish them from “official labels,” such as the EnergyGuide, UL, Energy Star, or other information provided by the manufacturer.

We have observed many unusual folk labels in homes and offices around the world. Thermostats seem to be the most frequent targets of folk labels (at least, regarding their operation). For example, many hotels find it necessary to supplement the regular interface with a folk label like “for heat turn red switch to ‘heat’.” Some of the labels are actually amusing. A hotel in Korea used little pictures of chili peppers to designate “more heat” on the room thermostats because South Asian visitors understand that more easily than fractured English or Korean explanations. Sometimes the folk label is needed because the controls are completely opaque. One of our favorites was “To override motion sensor, flick switch rapidly 5 times.”

Folk labels are just as important to auditors and other professionals as they are to the occupants. They are signals of problematic operation and a clue that energy is being wasted. Thus an energy auditor should be especially attentive when encountering folk labels. Do the occupants truly understand how to operate that thermostat, or is the folk label describing an energy-inefficient work-around? The designers of appliance controls should also track the appearance of folk labels on their products. In many cases, a folk label is evidence of a design failure. We noticed that some commercial lighting controls get folk labeled because they lack essential information like “off” or “this is a light switch”!

As appliances get smarter and control more aspects of their own operation, the interface with users becomes more—not less—important. A frustrated user will disable the most energy-efficient settings in order to get the desired results without reading the manual or spending ten minutes relearning the procedure. There is something truly ironic when folk labels are needed to operate “smart” thermostats, lighting systems, or appliances.

I would like to ask your help in assembling more examples of folk labels. Send us your photographs (or even sketches). Please e-mail your pictures and any background information to akmeier [at] homeenergy [dot] org. We will create a library so that we can all view and learn from them.

- Alan Meier

Views: 492

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by Rana Belshe on March 12, 2012 at 5:53pm

Another kind of 'control' & folk label...

Comment by tedkidd on March 9, 2012 at 7:46am

Awesome post!  Although I would disagree with this:  

As appliances get smarter and control more aspects of their own operation, the interface with users becomes more—not less—important. A frustrated user will disable the most energy-efficient settings in order to get the desired results without reading the manual or spending ten minutes relearning the procedure.

It presumes WE know how to operate buildings in a manner that saves energy.  Is it possible that our own presumptions and unquantified bias's are in the way too?  

I think what truly saves energy is a setup that guarantees occupants will NEVER touch the interface.  The equipment today is much smarter than we are, and is now designed to deliver load matching energy replacement super efficiently UNLESS it sees input from the occupant, in which case all bets are off.  Efficient delivery takes a back seat as alarm bells sound and the system re-prioritizes to delivering comfort as quickly as possible.   

Some people decline weatherization recommendations, electing just to replace equipment.  In this case load is basically unchanged, right?  When reviewing annual consumption I can't make heads of tails of why so much energy was saved the natural next step is to question the occupants.  

The response that the dwelling is so much more comfortable that they no longer adjust the thermostat 3 times a day leads to what conclusion?  I can only conclude savings must be from much more efficient energy replacement resulting from equipment being allowed to chase efficiency rather than constantly chasing comfort.  

I'm finding that delivering comfort prevents frustrated users from interacting with the interface.  Make the house comfortable and allow the equipment to maximize efficiency.  

Comment by Evan Mills on March 3, 2012 at 12:09am

This one isn't directly applicable, but there may be some useful cross-pollination potential.

Featured Forum Discussions

Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?

Started by Steve in General Forum. Last reply by Eric Kjelshus on Saturday. 4 Replies

Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.

Started by Daniel James Grundy in Training. Last reply by Daniel James Grundy Mar 23. 5 Replies

BDT with vermiculite in hollow CMU walls?

Started by Brad Cook in General Forum. Last reply by John Nicholas Mar 23. 2 Replies

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Sy Richardson posted a video

Energy Efficient Roofing & 200 MPH Wind Rated

EternaTile delivers the easiest roof to install while delivering energy efficiency, aesthetics and up to 200 MPH sustained wind resistance. Watch how easy it is to install an EternaTile roof.
55 minutes ago
Jacob Corvidae commented on Home Energy Magazine's blog post The Elephant in the Room
"Great story, Jim (and Kara).  For anyone interested in training on engaging with…"
2 hours ago
Tom Phillips commented on Home Energy Magazine's blog post The Elephant in the Room
"Great reminder! How do we get more contractors to visit their legislators? Related info from state…"
2 hours ago
Tom Phillips liked Home Energy Magazine's blog post The Elephant in the Room
3 hours ago
Jose Macho replied to Rob Madden's discussion Energy auditing as a stand-alone business model...
"Energy auditing as a stand alone business is not a sustainable business model. The biggest factor…"
3 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Rob Madden's discussion Energy auditing as a stand-alone business model...
"Oh, we are also finding EVERY effort towards radical transparency accelerates achievement of trust…"
3 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Rob Madden's discussion Energy auditing as a stand-alone business model...
"We have a stand alone model that is working, but your definitions need clarification. Do you mean a…"
4 hours ago
Home Energy Magazine's video was featured

Sneak Peek at U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon 2017

Get a sneak peek at the U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon team house renderings. The competition takes place October 5-9 and 12-15, 2017 in Denver, CO
4 hours ago

Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service