As we make homes tighter, we need to provide ventilation, which costs energy. One way to reduce the energy impact of that ventilation is to use an air-to-air heat recovery system. A heat recovery ventilator (HRV) recovers sensible heat by exchanging heat between incoming and outgoing airstreams. An energy recovery ventilator (ERV) is similar to an HRV but also allows moisture to be exchanged.


ERVs make a lot of sense both in hot-humid climates and in cold climates. In the former they reduce the dehumidification load by keeping excess moisture out; in the latter they reduce the humidification load by keeping moisture in. Nevertheless, there are reasons why one may wish to be cautious in using ERVs.

ERVs do not make a lot of sense when you want to exhaust excess indoor moisture and replace it with drier outdoor air. Many codes (and ASHRAE Standard 62.2) require kitchen and/or bath exhaust to allow the removal of excess moisture. Running these exhausts through an ERV would recover this moisture and dump it back in house. Rarely is this what one wants to do. Yet there is a growing segment of building professionals who are using ERVs in exactly this way. It is not clear whether this use of an ERV meets the requirement of exhaust, but it does seem clear that it could cause moisture problems.

An even more disconcerting issue is the fact that some ERVs can “recover” formaldehyde in the same way that they recover water. Recent research has confirmed what many of us suspected—that there are hazardous concentrations of formaldehyde in many homes. While the ultimate solution may be source control, dilution ventilation is a key method of reducing indoor concentration. Having ERVs that recover formaldehyde represents a serious risk.

Because water and formaldehyde are reasonably similar chemically, it is not surprising that the mechanisms that would recover water could recover formaldehyde. Research has shown that specific materials (for example, certain desiccants and plastics) can do a good job of this. That is not to say, however, that all ERVs do, in fact, recover formaldehyde. Clever designs of materials, layers, coatings, membranes, and so forth could in theory make ERVs highly selective. There is, unfortunately, almost no data available on the performance of ERVs currently on the market with respect to formaldehyde (or other contaminants). Such test data is needed on the various ERVs in the marketplace. Unless one knows that formaldehyde is not a contaminant of concern, one should probably be cautious in using ERVs.

The yellow flag is out on energy recovery ventilators.

 

- Max Sherman


Max Sherman is a senior scientist in the Environmental Energy Technologies Division at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and a frequent contributor to Home Energy.

Views: 63

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

Colin Genge replied to Kim Tanner's discussion Blower Door Applications Guide in the group Multifamily Buildings
"This is a great guide that anyone testing with multiple fans should get hold  of. "
19 minutes ago
Colin Genge added a discussion to the group Multifamily Buildings
Thumbnail

Just posted a lot of Multi-Family oriented blower door videos.

Just posted a lot of Multi-Family oriented blower door videos. Everything to do with Multi-Fan…See More
26 minutes ago
Colin Genge joined Norm Bourassa's group
Thumbnail

Multifamily Buildings

For too long there has been relatively little EE focus on multifamily, but some new programs have…See More
28 minutes ago
Colin Genge replied to Sean Lintow Sr's discussion Duct Testing - is a change in order? in the group Best Practices (Residential)
"I would assume you tested that high air leakage from the equipment cabinet and not on a flex…"
40 minutes ago
Colin Genge replied to Sean Lintow Sr's discussion Blower Doors & Methods Used in the group Best Practices (Residential)
"For those of you who need  a Tectite report, FanTestic's report Generator is powerful…"
56 minutes ago
Colin Genge joined Sean Lintow Sr's group
Thumbnail

Best Practices (Residential)

Best Building, Retrofitting, or even Auditing Practices - what are they, what should change, what…See More
56 minutes ago
Eric Kjelshus replied to Kirsten Richnavsky's discussion Let's Play Stump the Chump! in the group Building Performance Institute (BPI)
"There may not be a solution?"
2 hours ago
Colin Genge posted videos
3 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service