Efficient + Disaster Resilient = Sustainable

Picture a so-called “green” building in a floodplain.  Now picture a storm-hardened home guzzling gas like there is no tomorrow.

For me, neither of these conjures up an image of true sustainability.

By virtue of being built unconsciously (or defiantly) in harm’s way, a building is not durable and thus not (in my book) sustainable.  Similarly, a disaster-resilient building belching out greenhouse gases that any scientist worth their salt will tell you is contributing to present and future natural hazards is not sustainable.

Substantial, but largely unconnected efforts have been made for decades on energy-efficiency (and self-generation) and disaster resilience.  We have developed an arsenal of methods for making buildings energy efficient and otherwise environmentally responsive.  And we have an equally large arsenal for making them disaster resilient.
Both can be done in tandem, but rarely are, thanks to society’s deeply ingrained ability to stove-pipe subjects that they deem unrelated.

Recognition of this the need for an integrated approach has been coming from an unexpected quarter: the insurance industry.  Zurich, for example, has noted that “Unfortunately, disaster resilience is not generally associated with being green, and has not been integrated to any great extent in the sustainability dialogue. ... Further research on the links between disaster resilience, energy savings and off-grid power systems might also help solve this conundrum…”  Other insurers have given premium credits for buildings that have self-generation (recognizing that so-called 'business-interruption' losses will be lower following grid outages).

This thinking can be applied at a neighborhood and regional level as well.  Tokio Marine insurance (one of the largest in Japan) has for more than a decade run a large-scale program to reforest mangrove forests.  They’re replanted almost 20,000 acres of mangroves in Indonesia, Fiji, Thailand, Philippines, Myanmar, Vietnam, and India  and claim that this has simultaneously offset their own corporate carbon footprint while also lessening the impacts of storm surge on coastal real estate.

Examples of how energy-efficiency can support the goals of disaster resilience--and visa versa--abound.

Efficient envelopes make homes more habitable when the HVAC goes down during power outages, and are less susceptible to ice dam damage.  Distributed power systems can keep the lights on when the broader grid is down. LED exit signs are more visible through smoke.  Closed-cell foam insulation can withstand water and flood damage far better than fiber-based insulation materials. Occupants of efficient buildings are less vulnerable to health problems during heatwaves.

While in Australia this month I met with building officials providing advice during the reconstruction effort following massive wildfires in 2009.  They have developed a five-step level rating system for fire risk on residential properties, and corresponding building requirements that get progressively more stringent with the hazard. Interestingly, the most cost-effective way to comply with their most stringent requirement for windows is multiple-glazed tempered glass.  

This perspective could advance the whole discussion of non-energy benefits in the energy policy community. Myopic cost-benefit analysis often applied to energy-efficiency projects typically ignores benefits such as improved safety.  Accounting for energy savings attributable to disaster-resilient measures would vastly help their economic case.

Of course, disaster resilience and energy efficiency don’t always go hand in hand, and each deserves to be pursued in their own right.  But if we can collectively recognize the rich synergisms it will help advance both of these practices and give us a building stock that is truly more sustainable.

Views: 906

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by Evan Mills on May 15, 2013 at 12:44am

Kevin - J.C.'s recent post brought me back over here, and I see that I never responded to your last note.  Totally agree that there is a big role here for PV and other renewables.  Like your neighborhood-scale vision.  We need grid-intertied PVs to be able to power loads in the home even when grid down.  Hybrid or EV could make a nice "UPS-on-wheels" as well where on-site storage does not otherwise exist....

Was interested in reviewing the link in your first post (below), but it's not working.  Do you happen to have a new URL for that info?

Comment by kevin parcell on August 29, 2011 at 12:03pm
I take your point about the extended benefits of envelope efficiency.  As you note, neighborhood sourcing isn't equivalent to off-grid, and when it's not it contributes to grid resilience.  Neighborhood sourcing also facilitates lowering GHG inasmuch as we end dependence on cheap primary sources to compensate for transmission loss, and so this approach contributes to global sustainability.  In that regard, neighborhood plants can also facilitate energy profligacy without necessarily generating GHG, making our energy gluttony a reality that we can face rather than fight.  I predict (why not) that the next generation of home energy professionals will be focused on sizing neighborhood- and home-energy plants (with envelope efficiency accomplished), applying our metrics expertise to helping reach the net-zero results.
Comment by Evan Mills on August 29, 2011 at 11:38am

Kevin - Grid independence is certainly a good thing (altho, of course "zero-net" isn't necessarily the same as off-grid).  Every little bit helps.  My point is only that there are certain unique attributes of certain energy-efficiency features that improve disaster-resilience, beyond reduced vulnerability to power outages.

Comment by kevin parcell on August 29, 2011 at 11:25am

I like your focus on the integrated approach and I agree with your equation, but 2+2 isn't the only way to get to 4.  I personally favor net-zero energy neighborhood/community sourcing as the best path to both resilience and sustainability.  With this alternative approach, efficiency delivers a bonus because it permits the neighborhood plant to serve more customers without enlarging its footprint, but I think that this consideration illustrates that efficiency isn't an absolute requirement for resilience or sustainability.

http://community.acumenfund.org/profiles/blogs/1bpp-10-the-tipping-...

Cheers,

Kevin

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Richard Vito joined Sean Lintow Sr's group
Thumbnail

Best Practices (Residential)

Best Building, Retrofitting, or even Auditing Practices - what are they, what should change, what…See More
6 hours ago
Richard Vito joined James Sayers's group
Thumbnail

Marketing Energy Efficiency

Sharing ideas, tools and examples of promoting energy efficiency to consumersSee More
6 hours ago
Richard Vito joined Allison A. Bailes III's group
Thumbnail

HVAC

HVAC design, Manuals J, S, T, & D, Duct leakage, Air flow, ENERGY STAR new home requirements,…See More
6 hours ago
Richard Vito joined Kyle Brown's group
Thumbnail

Wrightsoft - Manual J / Manual D

If you use Wrightsoft to calculate loads or design ducts, you likely have questions.  Get answers…See More
6 hours ago
Richard Vito joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
6 hours ago
Jim Gunshinan commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post Energy Upgrade California—Up Close and Personal
"I had a revelation while attending Bruce Manclark's session of duct leak testing at the Energy…"
20 hours ago
George J. Nesbitt commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post Energy Upgrade California—Up Close and Personal
"Blower Door; the 2007 test was a depressurization test, and the 2014 a pressurization test, which…"
20 hours ago
George J. Nesbitt replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Plan, plan, plan, plan. The 1st step to is to understand the house, how it's built, the…"
20 hours ago
George J. Nesbitt posted an event

High Performance Windows - A Panel of Experts at Pyramid Alehouse`

April 26, 2014 from 3pm to 5pm
Join a lively panel discussion on high performance windows. We'll cover some basics, as well as…See More
22 hours ago
Kaushal Bharath Raju replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Hi David, Thanks for pointing out Martin Holiday's article. I do not wish to engage in the…"
22 hours ago
Profile IconAdam Penberthy, Scot Davidson and j jarvella joined Home Energy Pros
22 hours ago
David Eakin replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"More food for thought on this subject - read this (fairly) recent blog by one of the most respected…"
yesterday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service