When people consider high performance homes the term “label” gets used most broadly – in both a positive or negative context. In general, when people talk about distinguishing homes related to energy efficiency, or other greenness it is referred to a label.
Also, the available research on sales of high performance homes tends to use the presence of what is called a label as the means to distinguish one population of homes from another.
But in reality a label, or labeling is one of four core methods. The others are a rating, certificate and score. Their definitions, methodology and the information provided by each vary quite dramatically.
I asked a diverse group of 50 professionals who encounter labels, ratings, certificates or scores in their day-to-day work. I asked them to review four potential definitions and sort 11 possible programs/techniques into the four definitions. Twelve people participated. They were allowed to skip terms they did not know, or assign a term to more than one definition.
The results are not at all scientific. But they do point to a big problem in working with high-performance homes, especially when one is available for sale. The problem is that there is far more confusion than agreement among this group of professionals. That does not bode well for how consumers make sense of any of this!
| Scores Agreement? | Agreement | Confused with? |
| Home Energy Score 100% | 100% |
|
| Blower Door Test 100% | 100% |
|
| WalkScore 73% | 73% |
|
| HERS 60% (Also - Rating) | 60% |
Also - Rating |
The results of the survey show there is greatest consistency when matching programs to scores. In other words, people know ascore when they see it. |
||
| Labels | ||
| WaterSense for New Homes 86% (also - Certificate) | 86% |
Also – Certificate |
| IndoorAir Plus for New Homes 56% (also - Certificate) | 56% |
Also – Certificate |
| ENERGY STAR for New Homes 50% (also - Certificate) | 50% |
Also – Certificate |
| Inspection Checklist 50% (also - Score or Rating) | 50% |
Also - Score, Rating |
The next most consistent match is for labels. But the techniques which came out high as a label also were defined by many as acertificate, by definition a step up from a label with a judgement call on qualifications Likewise certificates were often alsoconsidered a label or a rating. No technique came out most clearly defined as a rating. |
||
| Certificates | ||
| Home Performance with ENERGY STAR 67% (also - Label) | 67% |
Also – Label |
| NAHB National Green Building Standard 58% (also - Rating or Certificate) | 58% |
Also - Rating or Label |
| LEED 46% (also - Rating or Certificate) | 46% |
Also - Rating or Label |
Implications for Program Administrators/Policy-Makers
In my experience the term “label” is a polarizing word, especially within the real estate industry. But the definition of label is pretty innocuous in my opinion. Programs that allow consumers to identify high-quality specialty building techniques are perceived as a label.
It is also interesting to note that something like an inspection checklist was highly perceived as a label. I believe this is where the polarization comes from! An inspection at time-of-sale to confirm a home’s energy efficiency could be easily mandated in a city or state. Such an inspection would clearly and almost instantaneously define the updated homes from those that are not.
On the other hand, confirming that a home has completed the building steps defined in a program like WaterSense is much different, and is simply a means for a homeowner or builder who has invested in such steps to signal they should be compared to a different peer group, and that a third-party has evaluated the work.
It would behoove program managers to consider shifting towards the definition of a certificate to step out of the controversy of a label. Likewise, those concerned within the real estate industry should clarify the difference between a peer label that signals an opt-in investment into a third-party program, versus a universal label that could be mandated and stigmatizing.
Finally, a note about Home Performance with ENERGY STAR. In my opinion, there is nothing the existing home market needs more than a certificate for energy retrofits to do what LEED and NAHB National Green Building Standard has done to distinguish these properties with confidence and clarify value!
Would you like to join this conversation? Please leave your comments or participate in the survey online.
Reprinted with permission by NotYetGreen. Original article online.
Views: 151
Tags: confustion, definitions, label, labeling, meanings, problems, words
Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.
Meagan Foster posted events
Meagan Foster updated an event
Meagan Foster updated an event
Meagan Foster updated an event
Meagan Foster updated an event
Anna Svensson posted a discussion
Bryce Cramer replied to Mike Kandel's discussion June's Stump the Chump: What's Wrong with this Picture? in the group Building Performance Institute (BPI)
Bryce Cramer joined Leslie McDowell, BPI's group
James Hatheway added a discussion to the group Job Board© 2013 Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!
Join Home Energy Pros