Climate Policy Initiative Analysis Finds US Building Energy Codes Work

The Climate Policy Initiative has completed a study to measure and evaluate the impact of residential building energy codes on total household energy consumption, “Codes to Cleaner Buildings: Effectiveness of US Building Energy Codes”, was released by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) of San Francisco, California on September 7, 2011. Conducted by Jeff Deason and Andrew Hobbs of CPI, the study was done to see if building energy codes make an impact on home energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.

 

Many states have adopted model energy codes (primarily the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code or IECC) and few have their own code that has been personalized to be specific for that state, such as California. Only 7 states have not adopted a statewide mandatory building energy code. A small number of states have adopted a less stringent code than the 2009 IECC. A 2012 version of the IECC was released in August of 2011 and there are states that are considering adopting this model standard and who have statutes that mandate its adoption.

 

CPI’s analysis reviewed states’ energy use from 1986 to 2008 using real data unlike previous studies that have focused on specific energy sources such as electricity alone or which have used engineering models to gather data. The study evaluated code effectiveness by comparing residential energy use in states that have adopted residential building codes to energy use in states that have not adopted codes.

 

The findings of the study show that the use of energy codes are: reducing energy consumption, driving fuel substitution away from fuels like oil and wood and towards natural gas, and reducing household emissions. Energy use per household was shown to be 10% lower in states with a code than in states without a code. The use of high efficiency natural gas heaters and electric heat pumps, which are encouraged in current energy codes, have reduced household greenhouse gas emissions by 16% in states that have adopted a statewide model code. To insure that the effects were due to codes and not to other factors, CPIs analysis controlled for the effect of changes in energy prices, weather, income, rates of new home construction, federal policies, time trends, and differences between states that do not vary over time such as culture and policy settings.

 

The study is a part of a broader project by CPI to evaluate the impacts of building policy in key regions around the world. A study done by CPI Berlin indicates that targeting different stages of the retrofit process may help Germany reach its target of 80% reduction in residential energy use by 2050 and a study is underway by CPI at Tsinghua on methods used to assess the impact of Chinese building codes.

This post was written by Michael Hairston of MEEA.Michael is part of the MEEA Policy & Codes team and his post can also be found on MEEA's blog, MEEAUnplugged.

Views: 128

Tags: CPI, Codes, Energy, IECC

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Kaushal Bharath Raju posted a discussion

Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.

We have a small 1940s single level house (1005sqf) in Berkeley, California that is in need of a…See More
2 hours ago
Christopher Morin posted a blog post

5 Things New Energy Efficiency HVAC Contractors Need to Know

1. Do not sell on Price! Use 'Simple Payback'The price of High-efficient equipment will undoubtedly…See More
7 hours ago
David Eggleton commented on David Eggleton's group Considering Permaculture &/or Transition
"In August 2014, in Minnesota, there's another unprecedented opportunity to meet and mix with a…"
13 hours ago
Glen Gallo commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post Energy Upgrade California—Up Close and Personal
"Nate, RE: Duct test On my own home and a rental I have tested more than once over the last many…"
14 hours ago
Profile Iconangela hines and Charles Goldman joined Home Energy Pros
18 hours ago
Jeff Flaherty joined Diane Chojnowski's group
Thumbnail

Tools of the Trade

A hammer and a saw used to be the key tools for home contractors. Today, the best-in-breed also use…See More
yesterday
Jeff Flaherty joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
yesterday
Debra Little joined David Eggleton's group
Thumbnail

Considering Permaculture &/or Transition

Some who work to increase energy efficiency and intelligent/wise use of energy are, and some will…See More
yesterday
Jim Gunshinan commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post Energy Upgrade California—Up Close and Personal
"Thanks for all the comments. Yes, it is interesting how the duct leakage grew over the years. Maybe…"
yesterday
Ed Minch commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post Energy Upgrade California—Up Close and Personal
"What sort of energy bill do you have now, what is  your target bill, and what will it cost to…"
yesterday
Nate Adams commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post Energy Upgrade California—Up Close and Personal
"I look forward to hearing more about the inside of the program! The big question that came to mind…"
yesterday
Glen Gallo commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post Energy Upgrade California—Up Close and Personal
"It is curious to see a 15% difference in the duct test from the test out of 2007 to the current…"
yesterday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service