*This post was drafted by Isaac Elnecave and Michael Hairston of the MEEA Policy Team

 

At the recently concluded ASHRAE Winter Meeting in Montreal, significant changes occurred to the development of the ASHRAE 90.2 standard (ASHRAE 90.2 is the companion standard to ASHRAE 90.1 and applies primarily to residential dwellings). Prior to the meeting, an advisory draft proposal had been circulated by the committee. This proposal received a very negative reaction from the codes community.

 

The 90.2 proposal was based on a proposal (EC-16) submitted by the National Association of Home Builders to the International Code Council (ICC) which was rejected by the building officials attending the Final Action Hearings last year  (During the ICC Final Action Hearings, building officials vote on proposed amendments to the code.  Amendments receiving an affirmative vote are included in the next version of the International Energy Conservation Code, which is the model energy code.)

 

At the ASHRAE meeting, interested parties were given (in a departure from standard ASHRAE policy) an opportunity to deliver comments on the proposal. The comments were uniformly opposed to the proposal and called for a radical redirection in the code development process (i.e. simply tweaking the proposal would be woefully insufficient). Most of the comments called on the 90.2 committee to use its expertise to consider the developing of a standard that is more energy efficient than the national model codes developed at the ICC.

 

Discussions by upper management at ASHRAE are ongoing to determine the direction of the 90.2 standard.

 

More posts like this and other energy efficiency topics at the Midwest Energy Efficiency Alliance official blog MEEAUnplugged.

Views: 129

Tags: 90.2, ASHRAE, Building, Codes

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Kurt Shafer replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Reading the Invisco description you will find that it is designed to be surrounded by cellulose to…"
6 hours ago
Glen Gallo replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Kurt, I think cost of operation is always a factor but I am not sure I would leave it just cfm.…"
7 hours ago

Paul DelVaglio just added their location.
(via Member Map)

8 hours ago
Paul DelVaglio posted a photo
9 hours ago
reflintorm replied to Jamie Kaye's discussion Flickering LED lights
"I think, Better to replace the dimmer switch if it is not recovered then once go through the…"
12 hours ago
Kurt Shafer replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Glen,  You are the first person who has ever told me they prefer lower CFM. What you left out…"
23 hours ago
Glen Gallo replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Tamarack has lower CFM than typical fans and has a insulated lid that automatically closes when fan…"
23 hours ago
Tom Conlon's discussion was featured

Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?

I just searched this forum for "Whole House Fan", but I didn't find much about them (except …See More
yesterday
Tom White shared Brandon Walton's blog post on Twitter
yesterday
Brandon Walton's blog post was featured

12 Things Every Home Performance Contractor Should Have on Their Work Truck

Every home is unique and differs from the last. It would be a perfect world (from a project…See More
yesterday
Griffin Hagle replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
yesterday
Griffin Hagle replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Kurt, Whoops, looks like I got my links mixed up. Thanks for pointing that out. Here's the…"
yesterday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service