Calculate How Much More You're Spending By Not Using LED Light Bulbs

Early last week, as I walked into my condo's elevator, I noticed something different; it was really bright in there now. After I pressed my floor's button I looked up and saw that all 8 of the PAR20 halogen light bulbs were replaced with new ones that clearly weren't going to let anyone hide behind any areas previously darker with the old lights.

 

Curious, I emailed the landlord and did some research on kinds of brighter light bulbs. After about waiting a week for my landlord to reply, "Yes, we replaced them last week with LED bulbs. And although some tenants may find them to be too bright for comfort, they're more efficient lighting and the condo management board ordered them.", he confirmed what I learned just after a few minutes Googling and a little bit of digging.

 

So, after learning more about the basic benefits of replacing older types of light bulbs with LED light bulbs, I thought I'd share a LED conversion formula I discovered to show just how much you could possibly save over time simply by replacing the lights in your house or commercial building. One thing to note is buying LED bulbs isn't exactly considered to be cheap. So with this calculator, my hopes is that you learn why people are doing it and hopefully it will help you find another way to save money on your energy bill every month especially in tough financial times like today.

 

LED Conversion Formula

(((Old Bulb Watts - LED Bulb Watts) x # Qty of Bulbs x 12 Hours x 365 Days) / 1000 kilowatts) x Avg.  cost per kilowatt

Conversion Example

Let's say you're replacing 10 x 60W incandescent bulbs with 15W LED bulbs. The difference in watts is 45W. I'm going to do this one bit at a time to give you more resolution into what's happening.

45W x 10 Bulbs = 450W (difference in the amount of energy to power 10 bulbs)

450W x 12 hours x 365 Days / 1,000 kW = 1,971 kiloWatts (total amount of saved energy in a one-year period if the bulbs are used for an average of 12 hours per day)

1,971 kW x $ 0.12 = $236.52

So, just how much money are you spending in unnecessarily just by not using LED bulbs? $236.52 PER YEAR. I consider that to be lot of money, especially knowing that i I could be saving it. Over a 2 year period you'd save enough money to pay for a second iPad :)

I ordered my first "set" of LED bulbs from a local company in town on Monday.

Views: 284

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by King Rosales on September 4, 2012 at 8:00am

@Bob CFL's are good replacement lamps. Although when it comes to the good bang for your buck department, LED's have come a long way. After talking to my landlord and the place I bought my bulbs, I discovered that the majority of the commercial buildings downtown and pretty much the top hotels, retail stores and big box retail stores use LED lights because even the short term savings in one year is better.

@Randy I bought 5 at $35ea

Comment by Bob Blanchette on August 31, 2012 at 3:40pm

CFL's offer the same energy savings without the high upfront cost of LED's. You won't see LED's compared to CFL's for payback time, because it simply isn't there. LED's always are compared to 100yr old technology incandescent lamps, not a very high bar if you ask me.

Sure LED's are cool, but LED's have a ways to go in the bang/buck department. LED's will replace incandescent and CFL lamps eventually, but it's going to be awhile before the normal population will buy LED in significant quantities.

Comment by randy tolowski on August 29, 2012 at 2:35pm

Good afternoon what was the cost of the bulbs? ROI

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Mark Richardson added a discussion to the group Renewable Energy
Thumbnail

Disasters & sustainable energy

Read my response to J.C. Martel's discussion:…See More
15 hours ago
Mark Richardson replied to J.C. Martel's discussion Disasters & sustainable energy
"Hi All, Interesting topic - myriad issues in play here, but I’ll try to touch on the ones I…"
15 hours ago
Eric Kjelshus replied to Johnny Ritzo's discussion Selecting a Water Heater
"I have been using  Rheem or State or Brad/white PVC flued tank type hot water heater…"
yesterday
Bachi Brunato replied to Bachi Brunato's discussion Boxing and Insulating Around Non-ICAT Cans
"As it turns out, we have 10 Halo 99RT housings with Halo 998P Eyeball trim in the kitchen. The trim…"
yesterday
Bachi Brunato's discussion was featured

Boxing and Insulating Around Non-ICAT Cans

I have a client with 16) 4" halogen recessed light fixtures in the attic.I'd like to cover the cans…See More
yesterday
Johnny Ritzo's discussion was featured

Selecting a Water Heater

I am looking at updating the heating and water heating systems in a rental home I recently…See More
yesterday
George Kopf's discussion was featured

Misting Aeroseal in Pressurized Home = Amazing Air Sealing Innovation

As a training program manager for a non-profit, I am often too busy managing my program to catch…See More
yesterday
Tom Delconte's blog post was featured
yesterday
Christopher Morin's blog post was featured

Selling with Rebates: The Simple Payback

  The easiest way to show a homeowner how their investment in high-efficient equipment will help…See More
yesterday
Edward Foskey's blog post was featured
yesterday
Mike Rogers's blog post was featured

HOMES Act introduced with Bi-Partisan Sponsorship

We don't see a lot of bi-partisan bills in Congress these days. Here's one focusing on home…See More
yesterday
Mike Rogers posted a blog post

HOMES Act introduced with Bi-Partisan Sponsorship

We don't see a lot of bi-partisan bills in Congress these days. Here's one focusing on home…See More
yesterday

© 2013   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service