14 Design Don’ts for High Performance Homes

There are a lot of ways to design a home. Designing one for high performance, though, or even better-than-average performance, has many recommended best practices that are based on a lot of research of homes that have failed because they're unhealthy, inefficient, and/or falling apart. This is why we have building scientists (see SOAP BOX below); to provides us with the Do's and Don'ts of designing high performance homes.

Here are just fourteen Don'ts that are too often Do's that lead to homes with high energy use, bad indoor air quality, sick people, crumbling buildings, or ugliness.

Don't…

  1. ...fill up all the walls with windows or leave exposed windows un-shaded. No matter how "super efficient" they are, windows are poor insulators and they can let a lot of the sun's heat in to a home.
  2. ...put a vapor barrier in the walls, floors or roofs, or anywhere else other than underneath the slab or crawlspace floor. This will lead to trapped moisture in failed building assemblies. It's only in climate zones 7 and 8 that you might consider using one, but you'd better be sure.
  3. ...let the water in. This is possibly the most critical don't on this list. Controlling moisture to keep it out of the building prevents damage to many parts of the building, as well as keeping the homeowners healthy. Wet buildings grow mold.
  4. ...design a leaky house. Simple and proper air sealing details can make a home go from a sieve to an airtight chamber, and can reduce the heating or cooling load in a home by as much as 20-30%
  5. ...design a thermal bridge. Many techniques, like advanced framing, and continuous insulation on the exterior of a building, can prevent a lot heat loss through building components.
  6. ...leave out a ventilated rain screen behind the cladding. This gap promotes thermal performance of the wall assembly, and avoids trapping moisture.
  7. ...choose products before process. Select the products to achieve the specified building performance and construction techniques, not the other way around. Selecting products first could drive up costs and compromise the homes overall performance.
  8. ...forget to design for slab edge insulation. Depending on the size of the home, and where it is located, as little as ½" of slab edge insulation can reduce its heating load by 20% or more.
  9. ...let the HVAC contractor over-size the heating and air conditioning systems. A correct Manual J load calculation can show that a home needs half or less than a typical "rule-of-thumb" method of sizing.
  10. ...forget the Ventilation (the "V" in HVAC) that provides fresh air to the home. People need to breathe.
  11. ...put mechanical equipment in unconditioned space. This makes the equipment work harder and less efficiently, increases the heating and cooling load, and wastes energy.
  12. ...ignore ductwork. Designing the architecture, structure and mechanicals to integrate with one another is simple when you do it all at the same time.
  13. ...design one component of the house at a time. The house is a system. Well, actually it's a home for people to live in, but it's also a system much like an eco system. The building and all of the components inside and out make up a network of many smaller systems that must work together as a whole; as an integrated system. Everything affects everything.
  14. ...and finally, don't, under any circumstance, design an ugly home. "It's not sustainable"*. Plus, it's ugly.

*Quoted from Joe Lstiburek, PhD, P. Eng, ASRAE Fellow – Building Science Corporation. Some call him the "Father of Building Science" in North America.

This is just the beginning.

I will be re-visiting this soon to add more Don'ts to a long (forever) list. In the meantime, I'd love to hear from you, the reader and observer of other failures or mistakes, about the kinds of things you see that we shouldn't see in our homes. It may just show up on the next list, and it may just save a home or building!

SOAP BOX

I'd like to see the roll of building scientist shift to architects. We have the greatest amount of control and responsibility on how a building is to look and perform, and mostly the profession shirks this responsibility and leave it to a builder, or as Dr. Lstuiburek puts it, to "by others". Our home and building owners' health, safety and welfare are in our hands, let's not let them down. As architects and designers, we took an oath!

Thanks for visiting the blog. Enjoy the rest of your day!

image of Stop Sign, from PublicDomainPictures.Net

written by Chris Laumer-Giddens

Views: 801

Tags: architect, building, design, high, home, performance, residential, science

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by Bob Daley on February 21, 2013 at 2:11pm

Excellent points! I think there's definitely some merit in the idea of architects learning a little building science, and working on the house at multiple points throughout the project to keep things on track.

Comment by Richard Scott Mills on February 20, 2013 at 6:43am

Chris passive house is good in all climates. I keep my beer cold in a insulated cooler when I go to the desert in the summer.

Comment by Chris Laumer-Giddens on February 19, 2013 at 4:09pm

Thanks, Igor. One of his better talks.

Comment by Chris Laumer-Giddens on February 19, 2013 at 4:08pm

Timothy:

The role of the structural engineer, which is primarily to make sure the house doesn't fall down, doesn't necessarily involve or equate to minimizing thermal bridging. So, to your point, and mine, an orchestrator can help make a systematic, well-balanced design that integrates responsibilities and systems.

Comment by Chris Laumer-Giddens on February 19, 2013 at 4:01pm

Thanks Richard. Passive house is a very good approach, especially for cold climates. Building tight is a good approach for any climate. Of course, good ventilation goes along with that. Super insulation doesn't do a thing for climate zones 1-4. Good insulation is beneficial, but there is a point of diminishing return, and R-50 is just more, not better. No matter what approach, it has to be climate (micro and macro) based.

Comment by Igor Zhadanovsky on February 18, 2013 at 11:32am

here is the full lecture http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkfAcWpOYAA.

It's a case of "one picture worth a thousand words ..."

Comment by Timothy J. Droney on February 18, 2013 at 9:02am

I agree on the role of architects guiding the design for energy efficiency. They have the most influence at an early stage of design. Being careful that the structural engineer doesn't undo efficiency with thermal bridging is important too. So the wholistic approach sounds like a good idea!

Comment by Richard Scott Mills on February 18, 2013 at 7:43am

The best first step is to learn about basic PassiveHouseUSA remedies. Extremely low air infiltration (.5 ACH @ 50  pascals), high insulation (R-50), fresh air ventilation (HRV or ERV). HP buildings can be built a no to low extra cost if you use whole house as a system, integrated design principles in the beginning of the process.

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Dennis Heidner replied to Jose Macho's discussion Why Are Energy-Saving Home Inprovements Down??
"Ben,  the German highway system concept actually started BEFORE Nazi Germany during  the…"
1 hour ago
Stan Kuhn replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Hot Upper Stories
"You note overheating on the south side (naturally.)  Assuming the typical roof overhang of…"
6 hours ago
Patrick Michaelyan replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Hot Upper Stories
"Thanks a lot Ed. And thanks to all who have added their two cents. I think I know where to take…"
7 hours ago
Ed Minch replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Hot Upper Stories
"We have successfully treated this same problem in perhaps 1000 of this same house in the…"
8 hours ago
Craig Savage commented on Craig Savage's video
Thumbnail

What is a Heat Pump Water Heater

"Hello Tom We are working with A.O. Smith, GE and Stiebel Eltron on a Building America task to…"
10 hours ago
Tom Delconte commented on Craig Savage's video
Thumbnail

What is a Heat Pump Water Heater

"Craig: I was serious, since my propane price jumped from .98 to 1.85! according to everyone the GE…"
11 hours ago
Ben Jacobs replied to Jose Macho's discussion Why Are Energy-Saving Home Inprovements Down??
"I think that government support for good ideas results in major benefits over the long haul. Please…"
11 hours ago
Craig Savage commented on Craig Savage's video
Thumbnail

What is a Heat Pump Water Heater

"Hello Tom Not sure if you are being sarcastic, but a serious answer would be that GE is selling…"
14 hours ago
Tom Delconte commented on Craig Savage's video
Thumbnail

What is a Heat Pump Water Heater

"Craig: do you have a diagram of one that will run longer than one year? They don't really seem…"
14 hours ago
Cory Chovanec replied to Bachi Brunato's discussion Boxing and Insulating Around Non-ICAT Cans
"All good points brought up. My advice is not to leave the lights. When you said halogen I think…"
15 hours ago
Jon Haehnel replied to Jose Macho's discussion Why Are Energy-Saving Home Inprovements Down??
"The first 2 answers by Tom and Sean jive with my thinking and experience. Thank you Don for…"
16 hours ago
Tom Smith replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Hot Upper Stories
"The most bang for your buck will come from airsealing the attic plane and sealing the…"
16 hours ago

© 2013   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service