Why Tankless, Hybrid Electric, and Solar Water Heaters Just Don't Work!

Tankless- expensive, high maintenance, high failure rates, high install costs, limited flow rates, poor winter performance, long payback.

Hybrid Electric- too tall, need surrounding space for heat exchange, poor durability, noisy, may need condensate pump.

Solar- requires southern exposure, cold & cloudy days: poor performance, very long payback, high install costs

What works?

The good old Storage Tank water heater- electric is OK, fast payback for gas or propane fueled(if low fuel price). Easy to maintain. Best to purchase long warranty unit for maximum durability.

How can this be? The best available technology at a reasonable cost will always prevail. And it has to, in a word, JUST WORK! With the exception, sometimes, of federal government mandated technology, (and dehumidifiers)!

Views: 6494

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by Tom DelConte on December 20, 2012 at 5:55am

Hello Bob, Does it cost less than a Rheem 22V40F1 gas water heater 40gal $400 ? t

Comment by Bob Blanchette on December 19, 2012 at 8:13pm
Comment by Bob Blanchette on December 19, 2012 at 8:12pm

Some of the newer hybrid heat systems can make tank less a good alternative. The tank less heater provides space heating with an air handler instead of using a gas furnace.

Comment by Tom DelConte on December 18, 2012 at 4:03pm

Hello Fred,

Here is an example article about what  I hinted at: There have been a few notable failures in energy programs & tec... . To put it clearly, lots of times federally sponsored technology JUST DOESN'T Work! They certainly don't reflect the true costs. And the feds invest in things by jumping on the old bandwagon instead of having a rational process!

Comment by Fred Stratton on December 18, 2012 at 2:51pm

Hi Tom.  Can you offer some more thoughts on that last sentence.  Are you saying subsidized technologies that the feds are interested in simply don't reflect true costs?  Or do you mean that the feds invest in technologies that don't make sense because they don't really work too well to begin with?  

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

Rich Manning replied to Diane Chojnowski's discussion Poll: Where do you go for information on home performance?
"My favorite is Building Science Corp. Its not only comprehensive, its free!"
8 minutes ago
Tom Barrett replied to Tim Kendzia's discussion Cooling effect from solar panels
"Any type of shading will help greatly. One of the biggest, if not the biggest, factor for high…"
10 minutes ago
Rich Manning replied to Dan Antonioli's discussion Net Zero Energy Hot Water
"80% seems a little  high to me for the solar system. Typically one would size the system to…"
11 minutes ago
Rich Manning replied to Gabrielle Rossetti's discussion Call for Proposals - Green Building Online Training
"I don't have any proposals Gabrielle, but if you get some let me know. I really enjoy your…"
15 minutes ago
Rich Manning replied to Tim Kendzia's discussion Cooling effect from solar panels
"I don't think anyone can dispute the fact that the roof would be cooler, although putting…"
19 minutes ago
Rich Manning replied to Shaun 's discussion Commercial duct testing
"The IECC code states that the area between a drop ceiling and roof is considered as…"
27 minutes ago
Walter Money replied to Shaun 's discussion Commercial duct testing
"Shaun, You can test anything. The question you seem to be asking is 'should I test the ducts…"
1 hour ago
Gabrielle Rossetti posted a discussion
1 hour ago

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service