Stephen Standley
  • Austin, TX
  • United States
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Share Twitter
  • Featured Blogs
  • Discussions (5)
  • Events
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Stephen Standley's Discussions

Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
19 Replies

I have recently switched to using a Minneapolis Duct Blaster and have noticed that switching the rings has been resulting in varying results. My question is which reading is more accurate? I know…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Paul Morin Aug 22.

 

Stephen Standley's Page

Latest Activity

Paul Morin replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"Sorry for chiming in so late.  Sean’s comment early on in the discussion was the closest to the point.  160 CFM is off the calibration charts on the high end.  Your Duct Blaster® Ring 3 may be able to top out at 160 CFM with…"
Aug 22
Michael Dunseith replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"Colin, "take a reading and assume it was ok?" Assumptions, Ah yes good point. Well taken. "
Aug 15
Colin Genge replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"Michael, how do you know the tester would not start out with Ring 3, take a reading and assume it was ok? What this repeated test is pointing to is that there is a problem here, so what is it? Is Ring 3 out of calibration for some reason, was the…"
Aug 14
Michael Dunseith replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"If your getting a good reading with the 2 ring on, using a DG 700 and it is not flashing LOW then that is the proper flow range. Sure you could put on a 3 ring and get a different number but why? The 2 ring matches the flow range. The 3 ring has a…"
Aug 14
Colin Genge replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"  I suggest checking your gauge and Duct Blaster on a regular basis with this simple set up. You’ll learn a lot and have fun too. The Principle is, if what you are blowing into, a duct or flex with a hole in it, is at the same pressure…"
Aug 11
Stephen Standley's discussion was featured

Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?

I have recently switched to using a Minneapolis Duct Blaster and have noticed that switching the rings has been resulting in varying results. My question is which reading is more accurate? I know that each ring is used depending on the amount of leakage in the duct system, however it doesn’t seem clear which ring I should be using. Yesterday I test a 1.5 ton system in a condo and I used the #2 ring. I got a result of 240 CFM then I put in the #3 ring (smallest one) and got 180 CFM. Which one is…See More
Aug 11
Allan G Hurst replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"I often change rings to qualify my findings. With the numbers you stated, my experience leads me to think you forgot to change the configuration setting."
Aug 9
Bob Klahn replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"Stephen, A good rule of thumb when you get readings that stretch credibility - or just don't make sense - Break down your (DG) set-up and redo it.  That will often make a glitch , like not switching the gauge to match the ring, stand…"
Aug 7
Stephen Standley replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"Thats why I was confused on my readings because I'm still getting a reading outside of what the CFM should be for that ring. If it is out of range does that mean its wrong? I did a field calibration and I'm slightly higher than the CFM of…"
Aug 7
Stephen Standley replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"No I only switched once."
Aug 7
Stephen Standley replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"Thanks for the info, I have been going with the number that I get with the smaller ring so that makes me feel more confidant. Yes I changed the setting on the manometer."
Aug 7
Eric Kjelshus replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"It may not be the Blaster but the water vapor presser inside, air speed outside.  I have also found duct leaks change with attic temp.  I have found return air leaks if in a stud of wall change with Relativity Humidity in wood and sheet…"
Aug 7
Brennan Less replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"To reiterate what Glen said, always use the smallest ring that allows you to achieve the desired level of (de)pressurization. It will always be the most accurate reading available. "
Aug 7
John Nicholas replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"You were testing leakage to the outside and total leakage, and also doing a Blower Door Test on the condo?   If so,  what surfaces were your sealed vents on.  Drywall? Laminate/tile Flooring? Carpet?   How did you seal those?…"
Aug 7
eric anderson replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"Just checking all the bases.  Did you remember to switch configurations on the dg 700 to account for the different rings?  That would certainly make a difference.   I built a test box- 2 ft square where the duct blaster attaches to…"
Aug 7
Sean Lintow Sr replied to Stephen Standley's discussion Which reading is more reliable on a Minneapolis Duct Blaster?
"I got to ask - When was the last time you did a calibration check because based on Minneapolis Flow Tables a 180 is impossible to get on the smallest flow ring. You may wish to check the manuals page http://www.energyconservatory.com/support/manuals…"
Aug 7

Profile Information

Company
Austin Auditors
Professional Certification
Professional Building Analyst
Professional Interests
Energy audits, energy savings

Comment Wall (1 comment)

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

At 3:55pm on July 8, 2014, Diane Chojnowski said…

Welcome to Home Energy Pros! Feel free to join the conversation in the Forum and Groups. And share your energy efficiency photos, videos and upcoming events. If you're blogging about home performance, this is the place for you!

Don't forget to add your profile photo and be sure to put your location on our Member Map!


Thanks!
Diane, HEP Moderator

 
 
 

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Sean Lintow Sr replied to Bud Poll's discussion Inconsistant Local Authotity
"There are actually plenty of them out there like the manufacturers themselves, SPFA, BSC,…"
35 minutes ago
Profile IconEthan Bukowiec and Andy Li joined Home Energy Pros
6 hours ago
Bob Blanchette replied to w d's discussion Managing Solar Energy
"Look into passive solar heating. The south windows have enough overhang that the windows are shaded…"
19 hours ago
Steve Waclo commented on Kaplan Clean Tech's blog post The Difference Between Home Inspection and Energy Auditing [Infographic]
"Excellent graphic summary but I don't agree Home Inspectors also check energy use. I believe…"
yesterday
Steve Waclo replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Low-cost electricity monitoring: Accuracy & Applications in the group 1000 Home Challenge
""The problem with plug in energy testers is they miss most of a typical homes energy use. 240v…"
yesterday
w d posted a discussion

Managing Solar Energy

What's the state of the art on managing solar energy (esp. at the home)?There's surely no…See More
yesterday
Bud Poll posted a discussion

Inconsistant Local Authotity

It becomes frustrating to give people modern advice and then have to backtrack and tell them to do…See More
yesterday
Morgan Hunter replied to Isaiah Borel's discussion Blown Cellulose VS Blown Fiberglass in the Attic
"Up here In Canada Fibreglass wins hands down for heat loss! Check back 5, 10 & 20 years later…"
yesterday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service