Its raining in my attic!!

Not enough insulation depth to stop condensation from forming on the surface of this spray foam roof line. The BER does not recommend installing a flash and batt attic roof installation unless you install enough spray foam to ensure that the surface temperature of the insulation does not drop below the dewpoint temperature of the warm, humid inside air. Also, the surface texture of the insulation will not allow the batt insulation to maintain complete contact with the spray foam, rendering the batt insulation an R-value of close to zero. Not to mention that gravity will eventually pull the insulation down and away from the roof deck in any case. It only takes a small air space to completely devalue the batt insulation. We recommend either spraying the full IECC code required R-value depth in the roof deck, or a flash and net/spray in place fiber or cellulose insulation that is fully supported with rigid backing so it does not sag and separate from the spray foam surface. In any case, the spray foam should be at a sufficient depth to ensure no condensation will form on its own, regardless of what additional insulation you install beneath it.

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Hal Skinner added a discussion to the group The RCC Classroom (Radiant Control Coatings)
Thumbnail

Improved acoustics

Some RCCs claim to improve acoustics .  Here are a few examples of ours.…See More
7 hours ago
Patrick Carter replied to Patrick Carter's discussion Minneapolis Blower Door & Test Equipment for Sale! in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"As of yesterday 09/19/2014, the equipment has been sold..."
yesterday
Hal Skinner replied to Hal Skinner's discussion An example of what an RCC can do with no R- insulation in the walls.
"Mornin Brett. 90 to 85, yes a slight variance there.  Same ASTM test, different scientists,…"
Friday
Bret Curry replied to Hal Skinner's discussion An example of what an RCC can do with no R- insulation in the walls.
"Great information Hal. It appears the thermal emissivity in your test was .85 rather than .90. Are…"
Friday
Juan Roca commented on Dale Stephens's blog post LED Lighting - Garage Door opener interference
"Hi,There is a real problem with remote controls and LED lights. However, there is a solution in the…"
Friday
Profile IconJuan Roca and Elizabeth Coe joined Home Energy Pros
Thursday
Casey Gesell posted videos
Thursday
Gerald Shechter posted videos
Thursday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service