CO

Views: 101

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros

Comment by Gary Baggett on February 7, 2011 at 6:05pm
Jack, I added some pics for you
Comment by Gary Baggett on February 7, 2011 at 5:53pm
lol...I didn't want to say that...I actually have a better picture of this somewhere. I should post a few on my "page"
Comment by Jack Baikoff on February 7, 2011 at 5:50pm
Yeah, thanks, sorry I did not notice it had an ambient CO display.
Comment by Gary Baggett on February 7, 2011 at 4:30pm
no, that was the co in the flu gases...which 400 constitutes an "emergency"
Comment by Jack Baikoff on February 7, 2011 at 4:25pm
OMG! What was the ambient CO reading?
Comment by Gary Baggett on February 7, 2011 at 12:44pm
Hey...I know where that picture came from...
Comment by Michael Dunseith on December 27, 2010 at 2:56pm
A friend of mind shared this with me the other day. I don't recommend keeping your very expense testing equipment in the flue any longer then need be.   Once you determined that the CO is excessive, does it really matter if its 500 ppm or more?  Note the efficiency!

Latest Activity

Profile IconMatt Baker and Thayne Brunswold joined Home Energy Pros
5 hours ago
Matt Baker liked Home Energy Magazine's blog post Portland, Oregon Passes Landmark Policy to Disclose Energy Performance to Homebuyers
6 hours ago
Sarah OConnell posted a blog post

Seeking Novel Applications of Thermal Storage

Through its JUMP platform, Oak Ridge National Lab has partnered with Trane to host a…See More
7 hours ago
Martin Newmark posted a discussion

Best Practice for Retrofit Insulation on Modern Knee Walls in Attics

I'm wondering what folks are doing to add air-sealing and insulation to knee walls in modern…See More
22 hours ago

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service