The goal of conducting a load calc is finding the CORRECT load on a house.  How does one know if the final answer that Wrightsoft provides is correct or not?  The short answer is they don't - unless the check their work thoroughly and verify that pertinent project project information has been correctly specified in the model.  

 

Wrightsoft software doesn't know if a user has calculated ceiling, wall, or floor area incorrectly.  The program doesn't provide an error message if a user entered 24,000 btuh (2 tons!) for appliance loads as opposed to a more realistic 2,400 btu (2 tenths of a ton!).  The best way to figure out if a load is correct is to DOUBLE CHECK all areas, R-values, U-values, HTM's, and final loads.  

 

Below is the checkout process that I use on every load....  Feel free to add to it!

 

▪Is exact location of home known?  Does it match specified climate data?

▪Is orientation known?  Has it been verified with homeowner / builder?  Does it match orientation as specified in Wrightsoft?
▪Are level elevations and ceiling heights correct?
▪Have all rooms drawn on plans been drawn in Wrightsoft?  Is every room set to “include in load” (this can be changed on the properties sheet for each room).
▪Have all windows been drawn in Wrightsoft?  (Be careful, glitches in the Wrightsoft program sometimes cause windows to disappear).
▪Are wall areas correct for rooms with multiple ceiling heights?  Is roof area correct?  Is floor area / perimeter correct?  (remember, slab on grade construction is evaluated by the linear length of the perimeter).
▪Have floor, wall, and ceiling r-values been verified in the component construction report?  Do Heating and Cooling HTM’s make sense?
▪Has duct location, insulation, and infiltration been specified for  each room?
▪Are U and SHGC values correct?  Have these been verified on site, with builder, or with window rep?
▪Have window overhangs been specified?
▪Is glazing in the ballpark of 50% of the total cooling load?
▪Have occupant loads been included?
▪Have appliance loads been specified for kitchen, utility, office equipment, etc…?
▪Have infiltration and fireplace details been specified?
▪Has fresh air ventilation been specified?  ERV, HRV, supply only?
▪Are warning messages displayed in the load meter?
▪Is the square foot per ton ratio somewhere between 800 and 1400 (for a new home)?  Does this make sense for the house?

 

Tags: calculation, j, load, manual, manual j, training, wrightsoft

Views: 193

Replies to This Discussion

I found the drawing feature to be very frustrating to master so I mostly use the worksheet feature. I'm assuming the glitche is in the drawing board feature, is that correct?

 

Dale, yes, there are several drawing board related glitches that are basically all related to one setting: grid point snap spacing.  

Basically, the smaller the snap setting number is, the more likely glitches are.   Problems can range from windows disappearing and rooms resizing themselves to the load changing drastically with just the click of a mouse (while not changing anything in the drawing).  

Folks get tempted to set the snap points to increments of 3 inches or lower especially when drawing homes with walls on 45 degree angles.  However, If you leave the grid set to 12" increments and set the snap to 6" you will still be able to draw a very accurate footprint and should be glitch free!  

I've had my grid and snap set to 4" for a couple of years now, and the "glitches" rarely occur, if at all.
I'll occasionally set snap to 1" to accurately line up my backgrounds to the grid, then immediately go back to 4".
This was a the recommendation from my good buddy, Hamilton, with WS technical support.

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Matthew Redmond posted a photo
15 minutes ago
Matthew Redmond posted a status
"Full house for NYSWDA's ASHRAE 62.2 course today. A lot of discussion on implementing this standard on NY State's diverse housing stock."
22 minutes ago
Paul Scheckel posted a blog post

Less oil, more courage: Energy and Art

Hard to admit, but I'm not all fun-facts all the time. Sometimes I even pay attention to things…See More
1 hour ago
Tom Delconte posted a blog post
3 hours ago
Profile IconBarbara Hall and Adam brown joined Home Energy Pros
6 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Jose Macho's discussion Why Are Energy-Saving Home Inprovements Down??
"Pat, I think you and I agree on a LOT of things.   One thing I don't want to see is more…"
22 hours ago
tedkidd commented on Tom Delconte's blog post Robert Shiller Says Retrofits Are Never Worth It!
"Bob B.   Buying a home is a good investment because it is forced savings more than a good…"
yesterday
Joe Huang posted a discussion

White Box Technologies launches Web-based weather data for building energy simulations

White Box Technologies is pleased to announce under agreement with ASHRAE the launch of WBT Weather…See More
yesterday
Joseph Lamy commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories
"My life changed when I got 'ductalatored' - became familiar with proper sizing guides for…"
yesterday
J.C. Martel replied to J.C. Martel's discussion Disasters & sustainable energy
"Thanks Dennis."
yesterday
Judi Lyall joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
yesterday
Judi Lyall replied to David Starrett's discussion I am looking for a good IR camera in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Hi there I am selling my equipment and have a great Fluke TIR for sale for 3600.00    If…"
yesterday

© 2013   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service