Attention Wrightsoft Users!

  Have you ever completed a load calculation and it just seems like it was short of what you had expected?  Particularly when you are first starting out with a tool, contractors can make mistakes. After all, we tend to learn "the hard way", right?  In an effort to make software work, the companies tend to start with some default values that require adjustment.  For instance, most have the duct system in the conditioned space calculating zero gains or losses.  If the ducts were in the attic, this could be as much as a one ton load that is missed! Internal gains tend to start at zero, and the foreground for windows is something between crushed rock and green grass.  Most contractors find these values, over time and as they gain experience with the program.  One still overlooked setting in Wrightsoft, a feature that no other ACCA approved software employs, is the Rate Swing Multiplier (RSM).  This can cause you to lose as much as 11% of your sensible gains in an otherwise perfect load calculation, maybe more!

Read More

Views: 169

Replies to This Discussion

YES running loads is like rounding up kats.  You very big knobs like south windows, open return in attics, unsealed supply's of building,   I was at a new home 2 yr old  this week - she claims the 1560 sf 4 spit  75,000 BTU/hr 2.5 ton AC is not big to H/C home.  So I just ran a load and come up with 2/3 of that  but when I ran the blower door  a big -50 PA was 3020 CFM  this home did not get sealed between walls where the plumbing comes up.  The HVAC sheet steel installer got the wrap but I feel the low end builder got what he paid for.   Then HVAC contractor  just put in  a 3 ton and 100,000 BTU and now will bid just this over sized "system".

My point is You must test out.     I have used  Wrightsoft for 20+ yr  and I feel it over sizes 10-25% If you do not test out and redo the numbers.   One of my .goals is to beat the 1st load.   To test is find run time when the temp outside is at design temp - I look for 100%  run time with out the heater hitting high limit.    Gramps told me to size to -40  and I use now 0'.    Now you see that  systems get over sized 

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

Steve Leombruno replied to Tim Kendzia's discussion Cooling effect from solar panels
"I have been told t"
12 minutes ago
Rich Manning replied to Diane Chojnowski's discussion Poll: Where do you go for information on home performance?
"My favorite is Building Science Corp. Its not only comprehensive, its free!"
18 minutes ago
Tom Barrett replied to Tim Kendzia's discussion Cooling effect from solar panels
"Any type of shading will help greatly. One of the biggest, if not the biggest, factor for high…"
20 minutes ago
Rich Manning replied to Dan Antonioli's discussion Net Zero Energy Hot Water
"80% seems a little  high to me for the solar system. Typically one would size the system to…"
20 minutes ago
Rich Manning replied to Gabrielle Rossetti's discussion Call for Proposals - Green Building Online Training
"I don't have any proposals Gabrielle, but if you get some let me know. I really enjoy your…"
25 minutes ago
Rich Manning replied to Tim Kendzia's discussion Cooling effect from solar panels
"I don't think anyone can dispute the fact that the roof would be cooler, although putting…"
28 minutes ago
Rich Manning replied to Shaun 's discussion Commercial duct testing
"The IECC code states that the area between a drop ceiling and roof is considered as…"
36 minutes ago
Walter Money replied to Shaun 's discussion Commercial duct testing
"Shaun, You can test anything. The question you seem to be asking is 'should I test the ducts…"
1 hour ago

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service