Can anyone tell me how Wrtightsoft treat a a insulated roof deck compared to a insulated flat attic.

Views: 577

Replies to This Discussion

The best way to determine what RSU does with scenarios like this is to do it both ways, then compare the reports to each other. The "component constructions" report (found in the Load section) will show you the gains losses attributed to each portion of your building. You could compare the two to each other here.

The general difference is that different roof types in RSU reference different construction assemblies in ACCA's Manual-J 8th Edition book. These "types" often have different U-values and assumed temperature differences, which means that they have varying HTM's (Heat Transfer Multipliers). For instance, a sloped ceiling with R38 cavity insulation is referencing group 18A, while a flat ceiling under vented attic references group 16B.

You'll also notice that anytime you're specifying a sloped roof surface using the room properties tab, Wrightsoft is making assumptions about the square footage of these surfaces. When you define a ceiling via the "room properties," flat ceilings use the rooms footprint as the sqft, while sloped ceilings assume a "typical" slope (somewhere around a 6/12, I believe). If your roof is steeper than 6/12, you should use the "ceiling tool" to draw a separate ceiling object on top of your room/building. This will allow you actually define the pitch of the roof, thus being more accurate.

Hope that helps!

Here's a recent post on how Manual-J can lead you to undersized ductwork, if you're not careful. I'd love to know what you think about it. Please comment!

Thanks for the information, I'll start running a few models and see what happens.

In addition to Isaac's response below, if you're insulating the roof deck and encapsulating the attic, be sure to model the ductwork as being within building envelope. This will reduce energy losses through the ducts. 

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

Tom White posted a discussion

Home Energy Reader Survey

Home Energy wants to serve you better.  Please …See More
11 hours ago
George Matthews's event was featured

Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop at Truitt and White Lumber Conference Room

October 7, 2016 from 9am to 1pm
Building Energy Performance Testing is sponsoring the Proof is Possible Tour to come to the San…See More
18 hours ago
Profile IconAshley Noreuil, Fred Smith and Peter Moncada joined Home Energy Pros
20 hours ago
George Matthews commented on George Matthews's event Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop
"Here is the flyer for the Advanced Techniques and Tools in Home Performance Friday October 7th at…"
yesterday
George Matthews posted an event

Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop at Truitt and White Lumber Conference Room

October 7, 2016 from 9am to 1pm
Building Energy Performance Testing is sponsoring the Proof is Possible Tour to come to the San…See More
yesterday
George Matthews replied to George Matthews's discussion Shortridge 8400 Flowhood for A/C airflow testing in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Here are the pics of the flowhood and airdata manometer"
Saturday
Sarah Holloway posted a photo
Friday
Joe Urycki added a discussion to the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
Thumbnail

TEC blower door and UEI combustion analyzer for sale

For sale is one used TEC Minneapolis blower door system: Includes model 3 fan with rings A and B,…See More
Friday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service