Can anyone tell me how Wrtightsoft treat a a insulated roof deck compared to a insulated flat attic.

Views: 454

Replies to This Discussion

The best way to determine what RSU does with scenarios like this is to do it both ways, then compare the reports to each other. The "component constructions" report (found in the Load section) will show you the gains losses attributed to each portion of your building. You could compare the two to each other here.

The general difference is that different roof types in RSU reference different construction assemblies in ACCA's Manual-J 8th Edition book. These "types" often have different U-values and assumed temperature differences, which means that they have varying HTM's (Heat Transfer Multipliers). For instance, a sloped ceiling with R38 cavity insulation is referencing group 18A, while a flat ceiling under vented attic references group 16B.

You'll also notice that anytime you're specifying a sloped roof surface using the room properties tab, Wrightsoft is making assumptions about the square footage of these surfaces. When you define a ceiling via the "room properties," flat ceilings use the rooms footprint as the sqft, while sloped ceilings assume a "typical" slope (somewhere around a 6/12, I believe). If your roof is steeper than 6/12, you should use the "ceiling tool" to draw a separate ceiling object on top of your room/building. This will allow you actually define the pitch of the roof, thus being more accurate.

Hope that helps!

Here's a recent post on how Manual-J can lead you to undersized ductwork, if you're not careful. I'd love to know what you think about it. Please comment!

Thanks for the information, I'll start running a few models and see what happens.

In addition to Isaac's response below, if you're insulating the roof deck and encapsulating the attic, be sure to model the ductwork as being within building envelope. This will reduce energy losses through the ducts. 

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Profile IconKatrina Ball, Mary Patterson and Lisa Meaders joined Home Energy Pros
7 minutes ago
Craig Bird replied to Hal Skinner's discussion What this RCC will do on an exterior wall compared to standard paint. in the group The RCC Classroom (Radiant Control Coatings)
"I agree and studies done will agree with you in those cases too - it makes sense when there is…"
9 hours ago
Hal Skinner replied to Hal Skinner's discussion What this RCC will do on an exterior wall compared to standard paint. in the group The RCC Classroom (Radiant Control Coatings)
"You might want to check out this discussion in my…"
14 hours ago
Craig Bird replied to Hal Skinner's discussion What this RCC will do on an exterior wall compared to standard paint. in the group The RCC Classroom (Radiant Control Coatings)
"In this scenario the walls were made of R35 rigid foam. Even if ex-employee of big energy company…"
15 hours ago
Sean Lintow Sr replied to Kevin Jordan's discussion air infiltration total
"Sorry I don't have anything handy but pull a search for EqLA equivalent leakage…"
yesterday
Erik Henson commented on Andrew Navolio's blog post MEEA assists with Home Energy Certification programs
"It seems to me like we are trying to re-invent the wheel.  There are several available…"
Saturday
Egr renovations posted a status
Saturday
Craig Bird replied to Hal Skinner's discussion What this RCC will do on an exterior wall compared to standard paint. in the group The RCC Classroom (Radiant Control Coatings)
"Actually emissivity rating doesn't make much of a difference between coatings because almost…"
Saturday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service