Can anyone tell me how Wrtightsoft treat a a insulated roof deck compared to a insulated flat attic.

Views: 519

Replies to This Discussion

The best way to determine what RSU does with scenarios like this is to do it both ways, then compare the reports to each other. The "component constructions" report (found in the Load section) will show you the gains losses attributed to each portion of your building. You could compare the two to each other here.

The general difference is that different roof types in RSU reference different construction assemblies in ACCA's Manual-J 8th Edition book. These "types" often have different U-values and assumed temperature differences, which means that they have varying HTM's (Heat Transfer Multipliers). For instance, a sloped ceiling with R38 cavity insulation is referencing group 18A, while a flat ceiling under vented attic references group 16B.

You'll also notice that anytime you're specifying a sloped roof surface using the room properties tab, Wrightsoft is making assumptions about the square footage of these surfaces. When you define a ceiling via the "room properties," flat ceilings use the rooms footprint as the sqft, while sloped ceilings assume a "typical" slope (somewhere around a 6/12, I believe). If your roof is steeper than 6/12, you should use the "ceiling tool" to draw a separate ceiling object on top of your room/building. This will allow you actually define the pitch of the roof, thus being more accurate.

Hope that helps!

Here's a recent post on how Manual-J can lead you to undersized ductwork, if you're not careful. I'd love to know what you think about it. Please comment!

Thanks for the information, I'll start running a few models and see what happens.

In addition to Isaac's response below, if you're insulating the roof deck and encapsulating the attic, be sure to model the ductwork as being within building envelope. This will reduce energy losses through the ducts. 


Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

Colin Genge posted an event

Home Efficiency Forum at Courtyard Portland City Center

October 21, 2015 at 8am to October 23, 2015 at 5pm
Home Efficiency Forum (formerly known as Boot Camp) brings Northwest Raters, Verifiers, builders…See More
4 hours ago
MCX posted a blog post

Good HVAC in Arlington, Texas

Arlington is a city in the U.S. state of Texas, within the Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington metropolitan…See More
5 hours ago
Profile IconRichard L. Sanderson and Diane Jackson joined Diane Chojnowski's group

Home Energy Pros on Twitter

We've created a twitter list of members of Home Energy Pros who tweet!See More
6 hours ago
Diane Jackson commented on Diane Chojnowski's group Home Energy Pros on Twitter
"@addisonhomes "
7 hours ago
Diane Jackson posted a blog post
7 hours ago
John Gillis replied to John Gillis's discussion Energy Savings of Whole House Fans vs. Air Conditioners in SoCal Featured on New 'Ask This Old House' Season in the group News & Announcements
"Hi Eric. Thanks for the response. If you wouldn't mind calling/e-mailing Nelson Warner or…"
12 hours ago
Profile IconShandi Whited, Noah Sanders, Edward G Fahrenkrug Jr and 2 more joined Home Energy Pros
14 hours ago
Alan Gindt replied to Alan Gindt's discussion Minneapolis Blower Door System for sale in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Bob, sorry but it has been sold"
15 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service