# Modeling a Townhouse

Hi everyone!

I am learning TREAT, so perhaps this is too simple of a question for you guys but I am kind of stuck... when TREAT asked me about the building I choose attached, considering that one wall of the building is attached to the neighbor's house, but when I check walls, all of them are set up to the outside, and so far I have not found the way to change the setting for that attached wall. Just for me to learn, is that attached wall considered towards living space? -considering that there is a firewall separating both units.

Luis

Views: 112

### Replies to This Discussion

Hi Luis,

This is a great question that points to a fundamental tenet of energy modeling: we don't worry about surfaces (walls, floors, etc.) where there's no energy transfer.  We assume that temperatures between adjacent units (or between conditioned bedrooms) are essentially the same, so UA∂T = 0 (the delta-T is zero), and there's no point in modeling the boundaries between them.

In other words, don't model walls between adjacent units, floors over conditioned spaces, ceilings under adjacent units, etc.  You've already discovered that TREAT doesn't give you the option to specify conditioned space adjacency.

So, unlike detached single-family homes, that will have at minimum 4 walls, a floor, and a ceiling, attached units will often have fewer.  The most "minimal" case is an inside apartment unit on a middle floor, which might have only one surface, a wall, on the Walls/Surfaces screen.

I hope this helps clarify.  Remember, energy modeling is not the same as architectural modeling -- we don't need to worry about surfaces that are there for structural or aesthetic reasons, but that have no thermal transfer.

- Ethan

Just curious, exterior walls have negative energy transfer (energy loss), heat gain from sun exposure, wind, etc, so when modeled as adjacent to the outside, with the R value of all materials, there is a calculation of that lost energy. I am thinking that the firewall should be pretty energy neutral and so I was thinking it should be represented as wall adjacent to condition space; even though I understand that walls from inside the condition space are not modeled. But the other Townhouse is not part of this condition space....  maybe I am seeing this the wrong way...  hmmm, love building science!

Luis

Exactly right, Luis.

The other unit is conditioned also, so there's negligible energy transfer between them, so the common walls don't provide a heating or cooling load, and there's no reason to enter them in the model.

And to simplify it, there's no way to enter them in TREAT.

If you created this model with the New Building Wizard, you probably have at least one wall that you just need to delete from the model -- the one that would have been adjacent to the other unit.

- Ethan

Great Ethan!

I am going to give it a try!!! I know that what you say makes sense... it just feel silly modeling 3 walls

Luis

## Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

## Latest Activity

"Hi Linda, the 279 kWh/month average includes both gas and electricity.  We've been having…"
8 hours ago
GEORGE LEVOSINSKI and Ric Secor joined Home Energy Pros
16 hours ago
"Nice explanation.  thanks"
19 hours ago
"Thank you Greg. This is very helpful. I will be meeting with the HO next week to perform some…"
yesterday
Lisa Hawkins added 2 discussions to the group Job Board
yesterday
Lisa Hawkins joined Diane Chojnowski's group

### Job Board

This group is for posting jobs related to all aspects of the home performance industry including…See More
yesterday
"I'll apologies in advance for drifting here a bit, but your "close enough" comment…"
yesterday
Jeffrey White, Chris Oliver, Jeanne Duvall and 1 more joined Home Energy Pros
yesterday
"Thanks Bob, we'll go woithout. It should be close enough without having to factor in pressures…"
yesterday
Greg Labbe posted a status
"Call out! Who's Got a Homemade Balometer? Has anyone rigged up flow collars to blower door manometers with great success?"
yesterday
"The FSEC studies are good,  but using a 2006 study seven or eight years later when newer…"
Friday
"Actually the are tax credits that are useful for the poor and retired people.   Look at the…"
Friday

© 2013   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.