Hi everyone!  

    I am learning TREAT, so perhaps this is too simple of a question for you guys but I am kind of stuck... when TREAT asked me about the building I choose attached, considering that one wall of the building is attached to the neighbor's house, but when I check walls, all of them are set up to the outside, and so far I have not found the way to change the setting for that attached wall. Just for me to learn, is that attached wall considered towards living space? -considering that there is a firewall separating both units. 

   Your help is greatly appreciated!

                                    Luis

Views: 149

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Luis,

This is a great question that points to a fundamental tenet of energy modeling: we don't worry about surfaces (walls, floors, etc.) where there's no energy transfer.  We assume that temperatures between adjacent units (or between conditioned bedrooms) are essentially the same, so UA∂T = 0 (the delta-T is zero), and there's no point in modeling the boundaries between them.

In other words, don't model walls between adjacent units, floors over conditioned spaces, ceilings under adjacent units, etc.  You've already discovered that TREAT doesn't give you the option to specify conditioned space adjacency. 

So, unlike detached single-family homes, that will have at minimum 4 walls, a floor, and a ceiling, attached units will often have fewer.  The most "minimal" case is an inside apartment unit on a middle floor, which might have only one surface, a wall, on the Walls/Surfaces screen.

I hope this helps clarify.  Remember, energy modeling is not the same as architectural modeling -- we don't need to worry about surfaces that are there for structural or aesthetic reasons, but that have no thermal transfer.

 - Ethan

Thanks for reply Ethan,  

    Just curious, exterior walls have negative energy transfer (energy loss), heat gain from sun exposure, wind, etc, so when modeled as adjacent to the outside, with the R value of all materials, there is a calculation of that lost energy. I am thinking that the firewall should be pretty energy neutral and so I was thinking it should be represented as wall adjacent to condition space; even though I understand that walls from inside the condition space are not modeled. But the other Townhouse is not part of this condition space....  maybe I am seeing this the wrong way...  hmmm, love building science!

              Luis

Exactly right, Luis.

The other unit is conditioned also, so there's negligible energy transfer between them, so the common walls don't provide a heating or cooling load, and there's no reason to enter them in the model.

And to simplify it, there's no way to enter them in TREAT.

If you created this model with the New Building Wizard, you probably have at least one wall that you just need to delete from the model -- the one that would have been adjacent to the other unit.

 - Ethan

Great Ethan!  

I am going to give it a try!!! I know that what you say makes sense... it just feel silly modeling 3 walls

I really appreciate your comments!

                      Luis 

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Kaushal Bharath Raju replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Thanks Chie! We have this event in our calender."
1 hour ago
Kaushal Bharath Raju replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Hi Alice; I tried sending you an e-mail but the message bounced. Can you kindly verify your e-mail…"
1 hour ago
Chie Kawahara replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Hi Kaushal, Thousand Home Challenge is a wonderful forum and the resource collection is…"
1 hour ago
Alice La Pierre replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Hello Kaushal, While it's true I did some of the finish work myself, I also acted as my own…"
4 hours ago
Kaushal Bharath Raju replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Thank you Linda for your response; and your generosity in sharing your suggestion and hope. I…"
4 hours ago
Kaushal Bharath Raju replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Wow...thank you so much for your response Alice! I really appreciate it. It is simply amazing all…"
4 hours ago
Tom White's 3 videos were featured
4 hours ago
Jim Gunshinan's blog post was featured
4 hours ago
Sharon Block's 3 events were featured
4 hours ago
Tom White posted videos
5 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Kaushal I just spent more than an hour on a detailed response and lost when I decided to check the…"
5 hours ago
Sharon Block posted events
5 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service