"Some of the best scientists of the previous 1000 years were also leaders in the Church. Aside…"
CO Testing for BPI
It is very important that as professionals we can agree on what we are testing. Carbon Monoxide (CO) is one of the most confusing issues.
First, BPI's prime directive is health and safety first. Monitoring the ambient CO during analysis is clear. A personal CO monitor or a combustion analyzer can be used to monitor ambient CO. Use the CO value on the analyzer for this.
Second, combustion analyzers can be used to measure the combustion byproduct CO in incomplete combustion. To accomplish that, the probe of the analyzer must be sampling the undiluted gases in the flue. Where you locate the probe depends on the appliance you are testing, and most of the combustion analyzers provide information on how to accomplish that.
Third, most combustion analyzers provide two CO values: CO and CO-AF or CO Air Free. CO-AF is the value that BPI is looking for for combustion testing. (If in doubt, record the CO, the CO-AF, and the O2 levels.) If the analyzer does not provide an O2 value or a CO-AF value, use the CO value and note that on the report.
CO-AF is a value calculated by the analyzer that subtracts the oxygen from the CO reading. The analyzer should be initiated in clean air with a oxygen level close to 20.9%. The formula is:
CO ppm x ((20.9)/(20.9 – 02))
A furnace with a CO level of 2 and oxygen of 8.9% would have a calculated CO-AF reading of 3.5.
A furnace with a CO level of 46 and oxygen of 3.2% would have a calculated CO-AF reading of 54.3.
Fourth, since the CO-AF value will be higher than the CO value, it is important to get the right CO value to begin with and that means inserting a NOx scrubber in the path to the analyzer - either using an analyzer that has one built in or adding it to the hose.
If we can agree on the use of these values in this way, then I think we will be much further along in providing consistent, reliable results.
Views: 434
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by A. Tamasin Sterner on -
Paul, Thank you for writing this clear description of the issue and the testing protocol. Question: What is the Action Level for CO-AF for natural draft appliances and gas ranges, and what is the recommended Action? Thank you, Tamasin
-
-
Permalink Reply by Chris Stratton on -
Paul,
Does this mean that if the air's O2 percentage is exactly 20.9 that the calculated CO-AF reading is infinite? Or that if the O2 percentage is greater than 20.9 that CO-AF is negative? What do these numbers indicate in more practical/intuitive terms? Thanks.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Judy Rachel on -
Curious where you found that BPI is looking for CO-AF. I've always been told BPI is looking for CO not air free CO. Would love to know where the clarification is as to which CO reading BPI's action levels are for.
-
-
Permalink Reply by A. Tamasin Sterner on
-
In the BA Standards under review. You'll find what is planned. These standards are not what folks are expected to know, follow, and test under however. We're just looking ahead.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Paul Raymer on -
Thanks, Tamasin. Unfortunately the description of CO measurement in the present BPI BA Standard uses the terminology of "CO as measured" which is not a value that appears on a combustion analyzer screen. It's CO or some form of CO Air Free like COAF. So the question is which one are they referring to? I vote for COAF because I KNOW that much of the time the analyzer probe is not in the right place, sampling CO that has not been diluted. Also, the COAF value tells us not only how much CO is in the sample but also how much oxygen which tells us something about how well the appliance is functioning which is basically the point of the exercise. Chris, if you get to a location with those oxygen levels, I would love to hear the results. What can I tell you? I'm not enough of a scientist to create that formula.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Chris Stratton on
-
Thanks Paul. I haven't seen >20.9% oxygen levels in a home, I'm just trying to understand the combustion chemistry that the formula is based on, and what exactly COAF is measuring that CO isn't, and why that is important.
Okay, so based on this it looks like COAF is meant to correct for how much available O2 is available in the combustion air relative to how much the appliance requires for complete combustion. The formula you gave essentially removes the excess O2 in the flue gasses, allowing you to measure the CO concentration as if there was zero excess O2 (that it, if it were undiluted). And this allows an apples-to-apples comparison of combustion efficiency/CO production between appliances having different combustion air requirements? Maybe this explanation could be useful for other people (like me) who are new to all this.
-
Home Energy Pros
Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.
Latest Activity
Laurie DiDonato posted an eventHERS Rater Training in Massachusetts at Maki Building Center
June 3, 2013 to June 8, 2013
6-Day HERS Rater Training- The first step to becoming a HERS RaterLast Week To Register!Your Cost…See More
Tom Delconte posted a blog postLykans $29, Vampires $0 !
Just wondered, does anyone know of a better looking intelligent managed power strip?…See More
Jim Gunshinan commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories"Thank you everyone for your comments. And I mean everyone. "
Edward Foskey commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories"I see no problem with it... Jim, thanks for sharing from your heart not only your faith, but the…"
William H Nickerson commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories"Tom , Once again you missed the bigger story
As a rater who cant sell Energy star because most…"
Diane Chojnowski commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories"Thanks so much for your blog Jim!"
bart laemmel commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories"I do have to say I found no connection between the title, the body and the conclusion.…"
"Well said Jim,
It was helpful and appropriate. Until we find the connections to each…"
Joseph Lamy commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories"Plop me smack dab in the middle of this one. Cut the baby in half.
Stories DO connect us because we…"
Trish Holder commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories"I enjoyed this very Jim. And I agree -- it is STORIES that influence people the most. It is stories…"
© 2013 Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
