It is very important that as professionals we can agree on what we are testing.  Carbon Monoxide (CO) is one of the most confusing issues.

First, BPI's prime directive is health and safety first.  Monitoring the ambient CO during analysis is clear.  A personal CO monitor or a combustion analyzer can be used to monitor ambient CO.  Use the CO value on the analyzer for this.

Second, combustion analyzers can be used to measure the combustion byproduct CO in incomplete combustion.  To accomplish that, the probe of the analyzer must be sampling the undiluted gases in the flue.  Where you locate the probe depends on the appliance you are testing, and most of the combustion analyzers provide information on how to accomplish that.

Third, most combustion analyzers provide two CO values: CO and CO-AF or CO Air Free. CO-AF is the value that BPI is looking for for combustion testing.  (If in doubt, record the CO, the CO-AF, and the O2 levels.)  If the analyzer does not provide an O2 value or a CO-AF value, use the CO value and note that on the report.

CO-AF is a value calculated by the analyzer that subtracts the oxygen from the CO reading.  The analyzer should be initiated in clean air with a oxygen level close to 20.9%.  The formula is:

                                              CO ppm x ((20.9)/(20.9 – 02))

A furnace with a CO level of 2 and oxygen of 8.9% would have a calculated CO-AF reading of 3.5.

A furnace with a CO level of 46 and oxygen of 3.2% would have a calculated CO-AF reading of 54.3.

Fourth, since the CO-AF value will be higher than the CO value, it is important to get the right CO value to begin with and that means inserting a NOx scrubber in the path to the analyzer - either using an analyzer that has one built in or adding it to the hose.

 

If we can agree on the use of these values in this way, then I think we will be much further along in providing consistent, reliable results.

Views: 643

Replies to This Discussion

Paul,  Thank you for writing this clear description of the issue and the testing protocol.  Question:  What is the Action Level for CO-AF for natural draft appliances and gas ranges, and what is the recommended Action?  Thank you, Tamasin

Paul,

Does this mean that if the air's O2 percentage is exactly 20.9 that the calculated CO-AF reading is infinite?                       Or that if the O2 percentage is greater than 20.9 that CO-AF is negative?  What do these numbers indicate in more practical/intuitive terms?  Thanks.

Curious where you found that BPI is looking for CO-AF.  I've always been told BPI is looking for CO not air free CO.  Would love to know where the clarification is as to which CO reading BPI's action levels are for.

In the BA Standards under review.  You'll find what is planned.  These standards are not what folks are expected to know, follow, and test under however.  We're just looking ahead.

Thanks, Tamasin.  Unfortunately the description of CO measurement in the present BPI BA Standard uses the terminology of "CO as measured" which is not a value that appears on a combustion analyzer screen.  It's CO or some form of CO Air Free like COAF.  So the question is which one are they referring to?   I vote for COAF because I KNOW that much of the time the analyzer probe is not in the right place, sampling CO that has not been diluted.  Also, the COAF value tells us not only how much CO is in the sample but also how much oxygen which tells us something about how well the appliance is functioning which is basically the point of the exercise.  Chris, if you get to a location with those oxygen levels, I would love to hear the results.  What can I tell you?  I'm not enough of a scientist to create that formula.

Thanks Paul.  I haven't seen >20.9% oxygen levels in a home, I'm just trying to understand the combustion chemistry that the formula is based on, and what exactly COAF is measuring that CO isn't, and why that is important.  

Okay, so based on this it looks like COAF is meant to correct for how much available O2 is available in the combustion air relative to how much the appliance requires for complete combustion.  The formula you gave essentially removes the excess O2 in the flue gasses, allowing you to measure the CO concentration as if there was zero excess O2 (that it, if it were undiluted).  And this allows an apples-to-apples comparison of combustion efficiency/CO production between appliances having different combustion air requirements?  Maybe this explanation could be useful for other people (like me) who are new to all this.

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Ethan Bukowiec replied to Ethan Bukowiec's discussion Thoughts on energy startup's new propane smart meter
"Wanted to give everyone an update on how things are doing with our Kickstarter campaign. We have…"
16 hours ago
Tom White's video was featured

Unlocking the Power of Grey Water in a Living Building Challenge Home

Rob Nicely, President of Carmel Building & Design talks with Tom Wood, Nexus eWater System's Chief Technology Officer, about Unlocking the Power of Grey Water.
16 hours ago
Griffin Hagle's discussion was featured

You're designing a Home Performance dashboard. Which 6 metrics do you include?

Credit Karma got me thinking about this. For those who are unfamiliar, it's a free* online credit…See More
16 hours ago
Bud Poll's discussion was featured

Inconsistant Local Authority

It becomes frustrating to give people modern advice and then have to backtrack and tell them to do…See More
16 hours ago
w d's discussion was featured

Managing Solar Energy

What's the state of the art on managing solar energy (esp. at the home)?There's surely no…See More
16 hours ago
Ethan Bukowiec's discussion was featured

Thoughts on energy startup's new propane smart meter

Hello,I wanted to introduce you all to a new energy startup I am working with called …See More
16 hours ago
George Kopf's discussion was featured
16 hours ago
John Porterfield replied to Dave Robinson's discussion Can We PLEASE Stop Calling Them “Ductless” in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Any update on this work?  Seems manufacturers would provide an indoor coil that would…"
17 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service