It is very important that as professionals we can agree on what we are testing.  Carbon Monoxide (CO) is one of the most confusing issues.

First, BPI's prime directive is health and safety first.  Monitoring the ambient CO during analysis is clear.  A personal CO monitor or a combustion analyzer can be used to monitor ambient CO.  Use the CO value on the analyzer for this.

Second, combustion analyzers can be used to measure the combustion byproduct CO in incomplete combustion.  To accomplish that, the probe of the analyzer must be sampling the undiluted gases in the flue.  Where you locate the probe depends on the appliance you are testing, and most of the combustion analyzers provide information on how to accomplish that.

Third, most combustion analyzers provide two CO values: CO and CO-AF or CO Air Free. CO-AF is the value that BPI is looking for for combustion testing.  (If in doubt, record the CO, the CO-AF, and the O2 levels.)  If the analyzer does not provide an O2 value or a CO-AF value, use the CO value and note that on the report.

CO-AF is a value calculated by the analyzer that subtracts the oxygen from the CO reading.  The analyzer should be initiated in clean air with a oxygen level close to 20.9%.  The formula is:

                                              CO ppm x ((20.9)/(20.9 – 02))

A furnace with a CO level of 2 and oxygen of 8.9% would have a calculated CO-AF reading of 3.5.

A furnace with a CO level of 46 and oxygen of 3.2% would have a calculated CO-AF reading of 54.3.

Fourth, since the CO-AF value will be higher than the CO value, it is important to get the right CO value to begin with and that means inserting a NOx scrubber in the path to the analyzer - either using an analyzer that has one built in or adding it to the hose.

 

If we can agree on the use of these values in this way, then I think we will be much further along in providing consistent, reliable results.

Views: 936

Replies to This Discussion

Paul,  Thank you for writing this clear description of the issue and the testing protocol.  Question:  What is the Action Level for CO-AF for natural draft appliances and gas ranges, and what is the recommended Action?  Thank you, Tamasin

Paul,

Does this mean that if the air's O2 percentage is exactly 20.9 that the calculated CO-AF reading is infinite?                       Or that if the O2 percentage is greater than 20.9 that CO-AF is negative?  What do these numbers indicate in more practical/intuitive terms?  Thanks.

Curious where you found that BPI is looking for CO-AF.  I've always been told BPI is looking for CO not air free CO.  Would love to know where the clarification is as to which CO reading BPI's action levels are for.

In the BA Standards under review.  You'll find what is planned.  These standards are not what folks are expected to know, follow, and test under however.  We're just looking ahead.

Thanks, Tamasin.  Unfortunately the description of CO measurement in the present BPI BA Standard uses the terminology of "CO as measured" which is not a value that appears on a combustion analyzer screen.  It's CO or some form of CO Air Free like COAF.  So the question is which one are they referring to?   I vote for COAF because I KNOW that much of the time the analyzer probe is not in the right place, sampling CO that has not been diluted.  Also, the COAF value tells us not only how much CO is in the sample but also how much oxygen which tells us something about how well the appliance is functioning which is basically the point of the exercise.  Chris, if you get to a location with those oxygen levels, I would love to hear the results.  What can I tell you?  I'm not enough of a scientist to create that formula.

Thanks Paul.  I haven't seen >20.9% oxygen levels in a home, I'm just trying to understand the combustion chemistry that the formula is based on, and what exactly COAF is measuring that CO isn't, and why that is important.  

Okay, so based on this it looks like COAF is meant to correct for how much available O2 is available in the combustion air relative to how much the appliance requires for complete combustion.  The formula you gave essentially removes the excess O2 in the flue gasses, allowing you to measure the CO concentration as if there was zero excess O2 (that it, if it were undiluted).  And this allows an apples-to-apples comparison of combustion efficiency/CO production between appliances having different combustion air requirements?  Maybe this explanation could be useful for other people (like me) who are new to all this.

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

George Matthews's event was featured

Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop at Truitt and White Lumber Conference Room

October 7, 2016 from 9am to 1pm
Building Energy Performance Testing is sponsoring the Proof is Possible Tour to come to the San…See More
5 hours ago
Profile IconAshley Noreuil, Fred Smith and Peter Moncada joined Home Energy Pros
7 hours ago
George Matthews commented on George Matthews's event Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop
"Here is the flyer for the Advanced Techniques and Tools in Home Performance Friday October 7th at…"
19 hours ago
George Matthews posted an event

Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop at Truitt and White Lumber Conference Room

October 7, 2016 from 9am to 1pm
Building Energy Performance Testing is sponsoring the Proof is Possible Tour to come to the San…See More
20 hours ago
George Matthews replied to George Matthews's discussion Shortridge 8400 Flowhood for A/C airflow testing in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Here are the pics of the flowhood and airdata manometer"
Saturday
Sarah Holloway posted a photo
Friday
Joe Urycki added a discussion to the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
Thumbnail

TEC blower door and UEI combustion analyzer for sale

For sale is one used TEC Minneapolis blower door system: Includes model 3 fan with rings A and B,…See More
Friday
John Nicholas replied to Kevin Emerson's discussion Studies re: radon mitigation and energy efficiency
"The Nay side is well represented with the links already posted. I presented a neutral side, with…"
Friday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service