HOMES Act introduced with Bi-Partisan Sponsorship
We don't see a lot of bi-partisan bills in Congress these days. Here's one focusing on home…See More
CO Testing for BPI
It is very important that as professionals we can agree on what we are testing. Carbon Monoxide (CO) is one of the most confusing issues.
First, BPI's prime directive is health and safety first. Monitoring the ambient CO during analysis is clear. A personal CO monitor or a combustion analyzer can be used to monitor ambient CO. Use the CO value on the analyzer for this.
Second, combustion analyzers can be used to measure the combustion byproduct CO in incomplete combustion. To accomplish that, the probe of the analyzer must be sampling the undiluted gases in the flue. Where you locate the probe depends on the appliance you are testing, and most of the combustion analyzers provide information on how to accomplish that.
Third, most combustion analyzers provide two CO values: CO and CO-AF or CO Air Free. CO-AF is the value that BPI is looking for for combustion testing. (If in doubt, record the CO, the CO-AF, and the O2 levels.) If the analyzer does not provide an O2 value or a CO-AF value, use the CO value and note that on the report.
CO-AF is a value calculated by the analyzer that subtracts the oxygen from the CO reading. The analyzer should be initiated in clean air with a oxygen level close to 20.9%. The formula is:
CO ppm x ((20.9)/(20.9 – 02))
A furnace with a CO level of 2 and oxygen of 8.9% would have a calculated CO-AF reading of 3.5.
A furnace with a CO level of 46 and oxygen of 3.2% would have a calculated CO-AF reading of 54.3.
Fourth, since the CO-AF value will be higher than the CO value, it is important to get the right CO value to begin with and that means inserting a NOx scrubber in the path to the analyzer - either using an analyzer that has one built in or adding it to the hose.
If we can agree on the use of these values in this way, then I think we will be much further along in providing consistent, reliable results.
Views: 434
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by A. Tamasin Sterner on -
Paul, Thank you for writing this clear description of the issue and the testing protocol. Question: What is the Action Level for CO-AF for natural draft appliances and gas ranges, and what is the recommended Action? Thank you, Tamasin
-
-
Permalink Reply by Chris Stratton on -
Paul,
Does this mean that if the air's O2 percentage is exactly 20.9 that the calculated CO-AF reading is infinite? Or that if the O2 percentage is greater than 20.9 that CO-AF is negative? What do these numbers indicate in more practical/intuitive terms? Thanks.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Judy Rachel on -
Curious where you found that BPI is looking for CO-AF. I've always been told BPI is looking for CO not air free CO. Would love to know where the clarification is as to which CO reading BPI's action levels are for.
-
-
Permalink Reply by A. Tamasin Sterner on
-
In the BA Standards under review. You'll find what is planned. These standards are not what folks are expected to know, follow, and test under however. We're just looking ahead.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Paul Raymer on -
Thanks, Tamasin. Unfortunately the description of CO measurement in the present BPI BA Standard uses the terminology of "CO as measured" which is not a value that appears on a combustion analyzer screen. It's CO or some form of CO Air Free like COAF. So the question is which one are they referring to? I vote for COAF because I KNOW that much of the time the analyzer probe is not in the right place, sampling CO that has not been diluted. Also, the COAF value tells us not only how much CO is in the sample but also how much oxygen which tells us something about how well the appliance is functioning which is basically the point of the exercise. Chris, if you get to a location with those oxygen levels, I would love to hear the results. What can I tell you? I'm not enough of a scientist to create that formula.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Chris Stratton on
-
Thanks Paul. I haven't seen >20.9% oxygen levels in a home, I'm just trying to understand the combustion chemistry that the formula is based on, and what exactly COAF is measuring that CO isn't, and why that is important.
Okay, so based on this it looks like COAF is meant to correct for how much available O2 is available in the combustion air relative to how much the appliance requires for complete combustion. The formula you gave essentially removes the excess O2 in the flue gasses, allowing you to measure the CO concentration as if there was zero excess O2 (that it, if it were undiluted). And this allows an apples-to-apples comparison of combustion efficiency/CO production between appliances having different combustion air requirements? Maybe this explanation could be useful for other people (like me) who are new to all this.
-
Home Energy Pros
Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.
Latest Activity
David Eggleton replied to Jose Macho's discussion Why Are Energy-Saving Home Inprovements Down??"That varies, as policies are different from state to state."
Orvil D Boyer replied to David Starrett's discussion I am looking for a good IR camera in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase"I have a Fluke TIR 32. Used aproximately 10 times 1.5 yrs old. This is the first…"
Orvil D Boyer joined allen p tanner's group
Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
George Kopf posted a discussionMisting Aeroseal in Pressurized Home = Amazing Air Sealing Innovation
As a training program manager for a non-profit, I am often too busy managing my program to catch…See More
Dennis Heidner replied to Jose Macho's discussion Why Are Energy-Saving Home Inprovements Down??"Ben, the German highway system concept actually started BEFORE Nazi Germany during the…"
Stan Kuhn replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Hot Upper Stories"You note overheating on the south side (naturally.) Assuming the typical roof overhang of…"
Patrick Michaelyan replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Hot Upper Stories"Thanks a lot Ed. And thanks to all who have added their two cents.
I think I know where to take…"
Ed Minch replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Hot Upper Stories"We have successfully treated this same problem in perhaps 1000 of this same house in the…"
Craig Savage commented on Craig Savage's video
What is a Heat Pump Water Heater
"Hello Tom
We are working with A.O. Smith, GE and Stiebel Eltron on a Building America task to…"
Tom Delconte commented on Craig Savage's videoWhat is a Heat Pump Water Heater
"Craig: I was serious, since my propane price jumped from .98 to 1.85! according to everyone the GE…"
Ben Jacobs replied to Jose Macho's discussion Why Are Energy-Saving Home Inprovements Down??"I think that government support for good ideas results in major benefits over the long haul.
Please…"
© 2013 Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
