Tags:
Permalink Reply by Isaac Savage on May 5, 2011 at 2:24pm Keep in mind that the MAJORITY of operation time is going to be at part-load conditions. More than likely, the larger unit running on its first-stage would be more appropriately sized, for more operating hours, that the "correctly" sized machine in a single-stage model (it would only be properly sized under the design conditions).
Manual-S states that the equipment selected must be able to satisfy both the sensible and latent loads. If you're wanting the benefit of a 2-stage machine (lower power consumption during part load conditions, ability to zone more effectively, etc.), you should just pick the smallest size that is available which also meets the design load. The first stage will handle the part-load conditions with the occasional help from the second stage. If an aggressive Manual-J is done, and the house effectively manages moisture, this should not be problematic.
If you use a program like Wrightsoft, you can look at the BIN data reports to see the number of estimated operating hours on first/second stages to help you make a decision like this.
Permalink Reply by Kyle Brown on May 12, 2011 at 12:19pm Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.
yangxiaohua posted a blog post
Judi Lyall joined allen p tanner's group
Judi Lyall replied to David Starrett's discussion I am looking for a good IR camera in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
Tom Maides commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories
Laurie DiDonato posted an event
Tom Delconte posted a blog post
Jim Gunshinan commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories
Edward Foskey commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post The Universe Is Made of Stories© 2013 Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.