I am participating in a DOE Better Buildings  program in southwest Ohio that is in its infancy stages. During discussions while setting the technical standards of the program, the topic of proper sizing vs 2 stage equipment came up.  Many of the "seasoned HVAC contractors" involved in this conversation including the director of operations for the program adamantly were advocating for the standard to be" 2 stage trumps sizing".  Meaning if you cant find a 2 stage piece of equipment in the correct size as specified by your manual j then go to the next available size.  (Most 2 stage equipment is not available in 1/2 ton sizes.)   For reasons discussed in this and other threads, I was in favor of forgoing the 2 stage piece of equipment for the piece of equipment closer to the proper size.  I was hoping I could get some input from this thread on reasoning for or against up-sizing in this situation especially taking in to consideration our geographic location.

Views: 153

Replies to This Discussion

Keep in mind that the MAJORITY of operation time is going to be at part-load conditions. More than likely, the larger unit running on its first-stage would be more appropriately sized, for more operating hours, that the "correctly" sized machine in a single-stage model (it would only be properly sized under the design conditions).

 

Manual-S states that the equipment selected must be able to satisfy both the sensible and latent loads. If you're wanting the benefit of a 2-stage machine (lower power consumption during part load conditions, ability to zone more effectively, etc.), you should just pick the smallest size that is available which also meets the design load. The first stage will handle the part-load conditions with the occasional help from the second stage. If an aggressive Manual-J is done, and the house effectively manages moisture, this should not be problematic.

 

If you use a program like Wrightsoft, you can look at the BIN data reports to see the number of estimated operating hours on first/second stages to help you make a decision like this.

RSS

Discussion Forum

Target superheat formula

Started by Miguel Orduno. Last reply by John Proctor Feb 18, 2015. 6 Replies

Now for Something Different

Started by John Porterfield. Last reply by John Porterfield Jan 12, 2015. 2 Replies

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Home Energy Magazine's blog post was featured
13 hours ago
Profile IconEfficiency First California and Kevin Daly joined Home Energy Pros
yesterday
Kevin Daly joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
yesterday
Bryan Gabriel replied to Larry Nissman's discussion Strange IR Image
"Is this a close up or broad view?"
yesterday
Home Energy Magazine posted a blog post
yesterday
Ashique Ibrahim posted a status
"Hello everyone.Please suggest a software to carry out analysis of energy auditing."
yesterday
Ashique Ibrahim posted a status
"Hello guys. I am student im doing my project on emergy auditing and benchmarrking. Please suggest the best software to do the analysis."
yesterday
Adin Maynard replied to Adin Maynard's discussion 2x DG-700 manometers for sale in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Yes, one is still available ."
Monday

Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service