Some of the luxury  homes I am rating have features that can use additional energy, but may or may not be outside of the thermal envelope.

I would like to have a document to give the designer that clearly states how I would account for these in a rating.  I also want to give an accurate and honest rating and discourage energy-hogging features.

In some cases, there is a question of whether or not an area is part of the thermal envelope.  For the sake of discussion, let me give some examples of what I have run into, or could run into in the future:

- an outdoor swimming pool that is heated by the boiler that provides the home's indoor heat and DHW heat.

- an attached garage with its own zone for in-floor heat.

- an attached multi-season porch with its own zone for in-floor heat

- a basement storage area that is under an outdoor porch floor.  No heat source and separated from basement by insulated wall and door.

- driveway snow melt system (I haven't run into that one yet, but it could happen)

 

Frankly, I'm going to be the bad guy here and I don't want it to sound like its just my opinion.

 

Advice anyone?

 

 

 

 

Views: 143

Replies to This Discussion

You have 5 items.

# 4 is obviously outside the Thermal Enclosure

# 5 should have its own source of heat and would be a non-rated item; if it shares a heat source then it is up to your provider

The rest need a decision by your provider. Perhaps even RESNET.

I don't have any good advice, but my opinion is that the owners of homes with obvious energy waste "just because I want it" need to include the usage in the rating, and compensate otherwise if they want a reasonable rating.  Energy use is energy use no matter where it is used.

A couple that I've seen (on the same house): N. gas space heater on a screened porch and a 250K BTU patio heater. 

And the most ridiculous one that I've read about (so far): air conditioned open patio, along with two patio heaters at the "Vision House".

So, there are at least two bad guys so far...

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

George Matthews replied to George Matthews's discussion Shortridge 8400 Flowhood for A/C airflow testing in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Here are the pics of the flowhood and airdata manometer"
yesterday
Sarah Holloway posted a photo
yesterday
Joe Urycki added a discussion to the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
Thumbnail

TEC blower door and UEI combustion analyzer for sale

For sale is one used TEC Minneapolis blower door system: Includes model 3 fan with rings A and B,…See More
yesterday
John Nicholas replied to Kevin Emerson's discussion Studies re: radon mitigation and energy efficiency
"The Nay side is well represented with the links already posted. I presented a neutral side, with…"
Friday
Ray Lehman replied to Kevin Emerson's discussion Studies re: radon mitigation and energy efficiency
"Hey John, Thanks for the information.  Very good empirical data. While I agree that running…"
Friday
John Nicholas replied to Kevin Emerson's discussion Studies re: radon mitigation and energy efficiency
"I have no links, just some anecdotal evidence. I had several Blower Door Tests done on my own home.…"
Friday
Chris Laumer-Giddens commented on Chris Laumer-Giddens's blog post Raising the BARrier in North Carolina Mountain Home, Air Tight Ceiling
"@Joe Nagan, We have found this technique to be WAY simpler and A LOT less labor than making a…"
Thursday
Judy Rachel replied to Blake Shurtz's discussion Testing spillage on induced draft furnace?
"I hope the attached picture is clear enough for you to see.  As the caption on the picture…"
Thursday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service