Some of the luxury  homes I am rating have features that can use additional energy, but may or may not be outside of the thermal envelope.

I would like to have a document to give the designer that clearly states how I would account for these in a rating.  I also want to give an accurate and honest rating and discourage energy-hogging features.

In some cases, there is a question of whether or not an area is part of the thermal envelope.  For the sake of discussion, let me give some examples of what I have run into, or could run into in the future:

- an outdoor swimming pool that is heated by the boiler that provides the home's indoor heat and DHW heat.

- an attached garage with its own zone for in-floor heat.

- an attached multi-season porch with its own zone for in-floor heat

- a basement storage area that is under an outdoor porch floor.  No heat source and separated from basement by insulated wall and door.

- driveway snow melt system (I haven't run into that one yet, but it could happen)

 

Frankly, I'm going to be the bad guy here and I don't want it to sound like its just my opinion.

 

Advice anyone?

 

 

 

 

Views: 107

Replies to This Discussion

You have 5 items.

# 4 is obviously outside the Thermal Enclosure

# 5 should have its own source of heat and would be a non-rated item; if it shares a heat source then it is up to your provider

The rest need a decision by your provider. Perhaps even RESNET.

I don't have any good advice, but my opinion is that the owners of homes with obvious energy waste "just because I want it" need to include the usage in the rating, and compensate otherwise if they want a reasonable rating.  Energy use is energy use no matter where it is used.

A couple that I've seen (on the same house): N. gas space heater on a screened porch and a 250K BTU patio heater. 

And the most ridiculous one that I've read about (so far): air conditioned open patio, along with two patio heaters at the "Vision House".

So, there are at least two bad guys so far...

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Hal Skinner added a discussion to the group The RCC Classroom (Radiant Control Coatings)
Thumbnail

Improved acoustics

Some RCCs claim to improve acoustics .  Here are a few examples of ours.…See More
19 hours ago
Patrick Carter replied to Patrick Carter's discussion Minneapolis Blower Door & Test Equipment for Sale! in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"As of yesterday 09/19/2014, the equipment has been sold..."
yesterday
Hal Skinner replied to Hal Skinner's discussion An example of what an RCC can do with no R- insulation in the walls.
"Mornin Brett. 90 to 85, yes a slight variance there.  Same ASTM test, different scientists,…"
Friday
Bret Curry replied to Hal Skinner's discussion An example of what an RCC can do with no R- insulation in the walls.
"Great information Hal. It appears the thermal emissivity in your test was .85 rather than .90. Are…"
Friday
Juan Roca commented on Dale Stephens's blog post LED Lighting - Garage Door opener interference
"Hi,There is a real problem with remote controls and LED lights. However, there is a solution in the…"
Friday
Profile IconJuan Roca and Elizabeth Coe joined Home Energy Pros
Thursday
Casey Gesell posted videos
Thursday
Gerald Shechter posted videos
Thursday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service