The following stumper is presented in BPI's October Performance Matters e-Newsletter.

This month's stumper comes from a chump who's actually stumped! Ed Revers of Michell Timperman Ritz Architects in New Albany, Indiana has been scratching his head about this one and is wondering if you can help.

Ed explains that he has been working on a 50 year old house that has a four ton top-of-the-line Florida Heat pump system, with all the energy saving bells and whistles (hot water de-super heater, four-zone stats on Arzel control board, etc). After 2 years of utility bills, the energy savings are nowhere near what the geothermal manufacturers claim they should be. The new energy bills (gas and electric combined) are the same as the past 20 years, during which an old forced-air conventional gas furnace was used. The mechanical contractor has come out several times to check things and reports that it is working fine. The house was super-insulated when the new geothermal system was made operational. It isn't easy to compare old to new systems equally, because an addition of about 25 percent was added to the house when the new system was installed.

Background: The house is in the Louisville, Kentucky area and is now a 2850 sq. ft. ranch with a basement. Mechanical installation costs exceeded $30K, with four grouted wells at 150' depth each. At the recommendation of the mechanical contractor, the house was zoned because the existing house limited duct work configuration options and R-values weren't equal everywhere. The new system performs well (70 in the summer and 68 in the winter), but the energy savings are disappointing. The weather has actually been pretty mild the past few years too. As a newly accredited BPI Building Analyst, Ed considers the house to be tight and well insulated; although no blower door test or duct efficiency test has been performed to verify this. Gas and electric usage is probably below average for a family of four. Any clue as to what would help lower the utility bills and make the system less expensive to operate?

Tags: BPI, Chump, Contest, Matters, Newsletter, Performance, Stump, the

Views: 232

Replies to This Discussion

Be really helpful to see the load calc and have a blower door #. 

The new system performs well (70 in the summer and 68 in the winter)

A 70 setting for comfort in summer indicates gross oversizing.  (poor latent removal means lower sensible is required to achieve comfort.)  From there you can suspect cycling losses/short cycling is partially to blame for lack of efficiency.  

They didn't expect to save on heating when they have natural gas, did they?  Exaggerated expectations by the sales person, and acceptance without research by the homeowner, can also be partially to blame.  

Are they tracking entering and leaving water temperatures?  Run times?  How about External Static Pressure?  These things will better tell how much of a design failure we have than "it maintains the temperature we set it at". 

looking at the information provided:


1 - is the system a multistage unit to better match load as well as zoning demands.

2 - is the heating capacity properly matched to to home demand - does the backup heat run?

3 - is the cooling capacity too large - so homeowner sets thermostat lower to dehumidify

When you say, "The new energy bills are the same as the past 20 years", my first response would be to show me the data so I can run a billing anlysis.  I put together a spreadsheet that analyzes gas and electric billing histories.  The analysis simply calculates the average energy usage for each bill and plots it with that month's average monthly temperature.   This normalizes the data for different number of read days in each month and adjusts for weather variations.

SLICK!!!

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

Rod Fox replied to Rod Fox's discussion Does calcification affect electric water heater aquastat temperature sensor performance?
"We're in climate zone 5 (near Santa Fe, NM) where it's dry as a bone. Gonna head to that…"
54 minutes ago
Bud Poll replied to Rod Fox's discussion Does calcification affect electric water heater aquastat temperature sensor performance?
"The two 4500 watt elements will never operate simultaneously.  It will be one or the…"
1 hour ago
Rod Fox replied to Rod Fox's discussion Does calcification affect electric water heater aquastat temperature sensor performance?
"Correction to this last posting... This model only operates one element at a time, not two in…"
1 hour ago
Rod Fox replied to Rod Fox's discussion Does calcification affect electric water heater aquastat temperature sensor performance?
"Agreed. Incidentally, I just called tech support at Bradford White (and actually spoke to a…"
1 hour ago
Hans Joachim Preiss replied to Rod Fox's discussion Does calcification affect electric water heater aquastat temperature sensor performance?
"Rod, Because the tank is not overheating, the behavior is either normal for this tank or there is a…"
1 hour ago
Rod Fox replied to Rod Fox's discussion Does calcification affect electric water heater aquastat temperature sensor performance?
"Hey thanks Hans. I didn't know about the benefit of the heatpump units having the elements…"
1 hour ago
Rod Fox replied to Rod Fox's discussion Does calcification affect electric water heater aquastat temperature sensor performance?
"I'm not sure if the tank was flushed at the time of element replacement. I would have hoped…"
1 hour ago
Rod Fox's discussion was featured

Does calcification affect electric water heater aquastat temperature sensor performance?

I recently ran across a situation where a 40 gallon electric water heater was cycling on and off…See More
5 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service