Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path?

The Thousand Home Challenge is moving the category of recognition forward that represents "Half-way there".

There is consensus that this category not be the same as meeting the 1000 Home Challenge. We are not lowering the standard (approximately 70% above average) for meeting the Challenge. 

There is much to learn from households that use half the energy as average Americans,  In many cases, contrary to conventional energy efficiency wisdom, they often have cost-effective opportunities to further cut their energy use - in many cases substantially. 

However, what do we call this new category of recognition?

How do we embrace this level of performance without diluting or confusing the brand?

How do we streamline the verification process?

What I need most are your comments on a name.

Please weigh in with additional name suggestions and your thoughts about this new development.

Honorable Mention?

2nd Base?

Half-way There?

Thousand Home Challenge Lite?

On the Path?

50% Better?

Combination of the above?


Tags: 1000 Home Challenge, 50% Milestone, Reductions, champions, existing homes, on the path, performance

Views: 507

Replies to This Discussion

Here's my use. This is roughly 4500 occupied sf - 2 family home with 3 people downstairs and 5 people up. 2 electric meters, one gas meter. The electric use shown is upstairs and includes electric car charging. I've recently sold my ICE - so the electric is now my only vehicle. 

Electricity Usage History    

4/23/2015 CUSTOMER 700    
3/25/2015 CUSTOMER 883    
2/23/2015 CUSTOMER 1081    
1/23/2015 CUSTOMER 1058    
12/24/2014 CUSTOMER 773    
11/24/2014 ESTIMATED 819    
10/23/2014 CUSTOMER 652    
9/23/2014 CUSTOMER 752    
8/25/2014 CUSTOMER 831    
7/24/2014 CUSTOMER 1563    
6/24/2014 ESTIMATED 468    
5/23/2014 CUSTOMER 588    
4/23/2014 CUSTOMER 731    
3/23/2014 CUSTOMER 983    
2/25/2014 ESTIMATED 621    
1/23/2014 CUSTOMER 841    
12/23/2013 CUSTOMER 712    
11/22/2013 CUSTOMER 773    
10/23/2013 CUSTOMER 1028    
9/25/2013 ESTIMATED 626    
8/26/2013 ESTIMATED 1170    

Natural Gas Meter # 00691926 
POD ID # R02000051738680 
Rate: RGD05RT - PSC16 SC5 Residential 
Tax Jurisdiction: NY1461000    Tax District: 0466 

Natural Gas Usage History    

4/24/2015 CUSTOMER 123.7
3/25/2015 CUSTOMER 237.2
2/25/2015 CUSTOMER 379.3
1/23/2015 CUSTOMER 300.9
12/24/2014 RGE 228.8
11/24/2014 ESTIMATED 205.2
10/24/2014 CUSTOMER 67.1
9/23/2014 CUSTOMER 19.6
8/25/2014 CUSTOMER 27.9
7/24/2014 CUSTOMER 8.2
6/24/2014 ESTIMATED 24.8
5/23/2014 CUSTOMER 60.8
4/23/2014 CUSTOMER 206.1
3/23/2014 CUSTOMER 421.2
2/25/2014 ESTIMATED 375.2
1/23/2014 CUSTOMER 390.6
12/23/2013 CUSTOMER 318.3
11/22/2013 CUSTOMER 191.6
10/23/2013 CUSTOMER 47.4
9/25/2013 ESTIMATED 15.5
8/26/2013 ESTIMATED 17.5

What would 50% of average usage BE for zip 14610? 


This is a diversion. Nevertheless, back-of-envelope calcs:

THC threshold for your place: ~ 17500 kWh/year (all energy (including gas) included as kWh)

Assuming that's 30% of average, 50% of average would be: ~ 29000 kWh/year

Your numbers above (excluding 2nd electric meter), range from ~59000 kWh/year to ~71000 kWh/year

Hope this helps.

Just logged on and discovered Chris beat me to the response - Thanks Chris! 

Here is my answer to Ted. Threshold calculator based on his inputs and use is attached.



Your 1000 Home Challenge OPTION B threshold is 18,876 kWh/yr (site energy)

Your half-way 1000 Home Challenge threshold is 37.752 kWh/yr (site energy)


This assumes the following inputs are correct:

ZIP Code based weather station 14610 Rochester

8 full-time occupants (based on sleeping nights)

4,5000 Square feet (finished floor area - exterior dimensions

2-family residence

100% fossil fuel heat


Your partial use, without the full electricity use reflected is 59.509 kWh

(based on the period April 24, 2014 to April 23, 2015)


Ted - 

It is important to clarify that the OPTION B 1000 Home Challenge allowance comes out to be fairly close to reductions that are 70% better than average, however, the allowance does not use US residential energy use as the input.

Instead the OPTION B allowance is based on simple inputs - house size (FFA), ZIP code, # of occupants, heating source, whether or not the project is attached or detached, and # of households. These inputs are used to determine the allowance for heating, cooling, water heating, and everything else of a very efficient/high performance home and household. It assumes no renewables are in place.

We do not have an allowance for electric vehicles. The projects we have that charge electric vehicles meet the 1000 Home Challenge without subtracting their energy use for EV charging. We plan to come up with ways (maybe with badges or icons) to give credit to projects that attain performance above the 1000 Home Challenge such as net zero energy, EV charging, and possibly substantial food production or very low water use. 

OPTION B is the threshold that all but 1 of our 26 projects have used. OPTION A is based on a 75% reduction of immediate verifiable previous energy use.

Immediate verifiable won't work, this has been improved over 20 years...

Ted - 

That is why the 1000 Home Challenge has two options for determining a project's threshold.

OPTION A is based on a 75% reduction of immediate verifiable previous energy use.

OPTION B does not use your energy use as an input - it is based on simple inputs - house size (FFA), ZIP code, # of occupants, heating source, whether or not the project is attached or detached, and # of households. 

The numbers I provided were based on OPTION B; Your half-way 1000 Home Challenge threshold is 37,752 kWh/yr (site energy) which is based on OPTION B inputs, not previous energy use.


Hi Linda,

I'd vote transitioning the verification spreadsheet to a website would help streamline the process. I realize this is a substantial and expensive proposition.


I agree Chris - that is where we need to end up.

It may be possible to have the threshold calculator portion of the application online more quickly than the full application.  That would make it easy for folks to log in and determine how close they come to meeting the 1000 Home Challenge.


Another faster option in the interim could be to post a You-Tube video on how to use the Threshold Calculator to determine your 1000 Home Challenge allowance. 

I would rather have folks join in the Intro webinar, but posting the video could function as a screening and recruiting tool. 

I like that idea. Giving people as many options to engage as possible (without overwhelming them) seems worthwhile. Some people probably find the spreadsheet intimidating.

I think we should get back to our discussion of whether the Thousand Home Challenge should embrace a two-tiered system.  Personally, I think it is a great idea for a number of reasons.

1. It would get more people involved in the process. Easier to achieve cause 70% reductions are hard!  More people are likely to try to achieve 50%.

2. It would be valuable to know how people met very significant 50% reductions even if they did not go on to reach deeper reductions - could have a broader impact.

3. Hopefully this would be a reward along the way, with more going on to achieve 70% with time once they are involved and can figure out next steps over time.  So likely would have more in the pipeline for 70%.

Ultimately, we want to have an impact on average households, and this seems like a good way to do that. 

I do agree that some clarity about the names would be good, and none of them yet quite explains this to me.  It is important to keep the brand clear.  Do others have ideas?  By the way 1st Base makes more sense to me than 2nd Base!  Maybe we need to be thinking about what a participant would say each level of participation in THC to come up with a good name.  One thought is whether it is indeed "Along the Path" or whether it is a goal in and of itself?  It is difficult to come up with a name when there are TWO challenges!  It does confuse the brand.

Level 1: committed to participate/ try to meet the challenge : "We have enrolled in the Thousand Home Challenge and are working to achieve deep energy reductions."

Level 2: 50% reductions achieved: "We have achieved the THC challenge to reduce our energy use by 50%" vs "We have met the first level of the THC by reducing our energy use by 50%."

Level 3: 70-75% reductions "We have met the Thousand Home Challenge by reducing our energy use by 70%."

(Level 4: Net Zero?)  As I think more THC houses are becoming net zero it would be nice to link that into THC.



Nickie - 

Good points. I think it is easy enough to flag or designate projects that achieve NZE site energy as that is verified with the info submitted as part of the application. That doesn't confuse the brand. Meeting 50% can be either an end in itself or a household's goal.

We are lucky in a sense, since the Challenge is based on verifying a performance threshold, that this new category would indeed be 50%, of or 1/2 of that -- or approximately twice as good as average, There must be a way to build on that to come up with good name for the 50 percenters. 

I sort of like these variations on the theme - 

1000 Home Challenge Honorable Mention: Well Above Average

1000 Home Challenge Honorable Mention: 50% Above Average 

1000 Home Challenge Honorable Mention: Half-way There

By using the phrase "Honorable Mention" it is clear that it is not the same as meeting the 1000 Home Challenge - However, it doesn't as effectively reflect the projects that are still in progress, with this designation being the half-way mark. 




  • Add Videos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Crosbey Archery posted a blog post
17 hours ago
Chris Woods added a discussion to the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Minneapolis Blower Door Fan and Door frame $990 OBO

I have a used Minneapolis blower door fan (fan only, no controls or panel) and the blower door…See More
Profile IconManuela L Heyn and Paul Nagel joined Home Energy Pros
Bill Spohn replied to Eric Sperline's discussion Wanted: Energy Auditing Equipment for sale in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"If you choose to buy new, give TruTech at call at 1-888-224-3437 option 1"
Home Energy Magazine's blog post was featured

The Legends of Home Performance

A project long in the making, we're happy to finally reveal some of our Legends of Home Performance…See More
Quinn Korzeniecki replied to Larry R Waters's discussion BPI Anaylist
"Hi Larry, We're glad you're reaching out to hire some BPI folks! You can also submit…"
Larry R Waters posted a discussion

BPI Anaylist

Industry leader in the north bay area California. Looking for experienced professionals and future…See More
Larry R Waters joined Diane Chojnowski's group

Job Board

This group is for posting jobs related to all aspects of the home performance industry including…See More

Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service