Actual Energy Use - 20 Thousand Home Challenge Projects & 20th Project to Meet 1000 Home Challenge

We just approved the 20th Thousand Home Challenge project! Congratulations to Ruth von Goeler and Kelly Slough of Northampton, MA. They participated in National Grid’s Deep Energy Retrofit pilot in 2012. Their OPTION B threshold was 13,071 kWh (OPTION B inputs - fossil fuel heat, 4 in household, 3,208 FFA, and 6,208 HDD (base 65). Andrew Webster of Coldham & Hartman Architects was the project manager.

 

Their annual energy for the post retrofit monitoring period was 8,136 kWh. Their 110-year-old home was previously insulated and had a relatively efficient heating system. As part of the retrofit they substantially increased the finished floor area and still achieved a 61% reduction in energy use from their baseline. 

 

Attached is a spreadsheet with data from our twenty completed projects. 

 

Interesting numbers, ranges, means, and comparisons!  I welcome your observations. What is most interesting from the attached spreadsheet?  Please provide suggestions for charts and graphs to tell the story of the 1000 Home Challenge projects to date.

 

ENERGY PERFORMANCE[1]

6.9 kBtu/ Ft2:  Avg Energy Use Index (EUI)[2]; US National avg. 44.8 kBtu/ Ft2 (single family homes)

1.91 kWh/ Ft2: Avg. THC Whole House Energy Use; US National Avg.: 14.27 Ft2

(5) Net Zero or Better

(3) Also charge Electric Vehicles

1,709 kWh/year: Average Energy Use per Occupant

4,554 kWh Average project energy use; 31,389 US National Avg: 31,389 kWh/yr

8,108 kWh Average project Thousand Home Challenge threshold

 

USE OF PV

(17) Homes have PV; (8 of 20) Projects met the Thousand Home Challenge without PV

(93 kW) Total installed PV Capacity (17 homes)

 

HOUSE & HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS

1869 Oldest home; 2008 Newest home

Year Built: (20%) 1850-1899; (25%) 1900-1930; (15%) 1931-1960; (30%) 1961-2000; (10%) 2001-2010

Correlation between indicators of energy performance and age: None

576 Ft2 Smallest home; 3,208 Ft2 Biggest single family home

2,271 Ft2 Average house size (per household)

1.73 Occupants: Average household size

(18) Single-family homes; (2) Duplexes


[1] Energy use is site energy, total household energy; house size is finished floor area (FFA)

 

[2] This is an average from the 20 projects, not the average energy use for the total square feet of all projects

Tags: 20th, Challenge, Deep, EUI, Energy, Existing, Home, Project, Reductions, Retrofits, More…Thousand, Use

Views: 923

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

The attached bar chart shows EUI (Energy Use Index)  of our 20 completed projects. 

As stated above the average for the first 20 projects is 6.9 KBtu/ft2; national average for single family homes is 44.8 KBtu/ft2.

This chart also provides an indication of project cost (H - High, M - Medium, and L - Low). You do not necessarily  need to do a complete deep energy retrofit of a home to achieve a deep energy reduction in energy costs. However, as with the Sloan/von Gouler project, the value proposition of a deep energy retrofit goes way beyond lower energy costs. 

Attachments:

Here is the link to Coldman & Hartman's post regarding the Sloan/von Goeler home  on http://www.coldhamandhartman.com/news.php?id=99

Here is a photo of the completed project.

Thanks Linda.  What I found interesting about the spreadsheet data you've shared is that it shows that achieving DER is possible with any age of house with or without PV with varying amount of investment. This means a homeowner can be creative in their path towards DER as long as there is commitment and focus.  Good news!

We are THC candidate and have few more months to billing data to collect to complete the first year of occupancy.  The monthly average on our our energy bill has been 279 kWh/month for the past 8 months.  We'll see how this passive house performs in the winter months. 

You can do it, Chie!  What's your yearly kWh THC threshold?  Unless it's really low, it sounds like you're on track.

Thanks Chris!  Our Option B threshold is 5331.  We have solar thermal but no PV (yet) and we would be delighted to meet the THC threshold without PV.

Chie - 

What is your gas usage to date?  Is the 279 kWh just your electric use, or does it reflect gas and electricity? As I recall, you use electricity for the clothes dryer and cooking, and gas for water and space heating, correct?

I have really enjoyed your blog. Please add the link to it for folks who may want more info about your project.

Hi Linda, the 279 kWh/month average includes both gas and electricity.  We've been having a bit of a cold snap here and the sun isn't shining as much, so our backup gas boiler is kicking on every day.  We moved into the house in mid-March so we have a few more months of data gathering and I'm curious how much gas we'll end up using.  

Here's the link to my blog:  http://midorihaus.blogspot.com/

Lastest post is on solar thermal system.  Enjoy!

Chie - 

Impressively low usage! Thanks for the update, and the link to your blog.

I just spent some time on Chie's midorihaus blog, describing the progress of engaging in a deep energy reduction project of their home. Lots of great, useful info! Check it out and I think you will agree.

I must say, I'm not a fan of EUI as an energy performance metric (for residential buildings, at least), because it rewards larger houses, and doesn't penalize larger aggregate absolute energy consumption.  Energy consumption per house or per occupant are better metrics, in my mind.
I would also like to see a greater differentiation made between energy consumption and on-site energy generation.  Though from a carbon emissions standpoint, grid (fossil fuel derived) energy consumption reduction through renewable on-site generation is equivalent to reduction through conservation, so I see the logic.  But still. Not using energy, and using energy generated on-site are not the same thing.
Maybe one thing to add to the spreadsheet or graphs could be the carbon emissions from the homes, along with that of the typical US home?

Thanks for all that you do.  Great to see the THC Home Energy Pros page lively again!

Chris - 

I share your concerns about using EUI as a metric. Any metric that is based on square footage of living space favors bigger buildings and penalizes smaller buildings. 

I envision that we need a constellation of metrics to tell the story of a home's or an initiative's energy performance. It was only recently that I worked the THC OPTION B allowance backwards to see what the range of EUI would be for different climates, house sizes, and occupancy. 

OPTION B of the 1000 Home Challenge generates a threshold that balances a number of inputs, and only uses finished floor area in order to estimate shell surface area (five sides). Below is a graphs that I find interesting. Hopefully, as a result, the OPTION B allowance meets the objective of being difficult to achieve across the full range of North American housing stock - ideally not favoring warm climates, cold climates, big homes, small homes, old homes, new homes, energy hogs or energy misers, homes serviced by low carbon electricity, or homes serviced by hydro. 

The Option B criteria themselves do an excellent (heroic, beautiful, gold-standard -- what other superlatives can I think of?) job at controlling for all the factors you cite, normalizing the difficulty for homes having different occupancies, behaviors, climate zones, heating types, etc. But then in the end to subvert all that innovative, clear thinking by comparing performance using EUI -- seems strange.  I understand the rationale -- it's a commonly-cited and broadly-understood metric. But then again, hey, whatever it takes; if EUI motivates and engages people and is not used in the certification process itself (but only after the fact), I'm all for it.  

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

Malcolm McKelvie replied to Alan Gindt's discussion Minneapolis Blower Door System for sale in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"yes I would pay the delivery fee!"
Saturday
Alan Gindt replied to Alan Gindt's discussion Minneapolis Blower Door System for sale in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Malcolm, If you want to pay delivery from USA we can talk. Otherwise no thanks."
Saturday
Malcolm McKelvie replied to Alan Gindt's discussion Minneapolis Blower Door System for sale in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"How old is it? I assume it is in good working order? I'm interested in it but the price needs…"
Saturday
William H Nickerson replied to Kim Tanner's discussion Fantastic innovation
"So that's where you use those True Flow plates....."
Friday
Colin Genge updated an event
Thumbnail

Passive House Testing Webinar with Kevin Brennan of the Passive House Academy at Online

September 29, 2015 from 1pm to 2pm
Tests needed to qualify as a passive houseWhy we’re seeing an increase in PH buildingsBest…See More
Friday
Colin Genge updated an event
Thumbnail

DM32 Smart Gauge 101 Webinar at Online

September 22, 2015 from 1pm to 2pm
Webinar Learning Objectives:Gauge settings and operationCalculate results in the gaugeUpdate the…See More
Friday
Colin Genge updated an event
Thumbnail

Blower Door 101 Webinar at Online

September 15, 2015 from 1pm to 2pm
See how easy it is to do your first test. Learn tips to perform your first duct test in only twenty…See More
Friday
Colin Genge updated an event
Thumbnail

Zone Pressure Diagnostics (ZPD) with Bill Eckman of NME$A Webinar at Online

September 10, 2015 from 1pm to 2pm
Benefits and limitations of Zonal Pressure Diagnostics (ZPD).Best practices for accurate…See More
Friday

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service