This is a link to a recent article from a leading energy marketing firm that discusses a multi-year decline in energy-saving improvements:

http://sheltongrp.com/files/2013/04/2013-Utility-Pulse-Release2.pdf

 

It would be interesting to hear members comments and their own view.

 

 

Views: 1063

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hello Jose,

I can give you my own original ideas to your question:

1. Most people find it boring to save energy.

2. Most people find people who save energy to be boring(that's how I'm perceived).

3. Most people prefer to spend their discretionary income on "fun" things: restaurants, entertainment, casino, auto, etc.

4. Most people believe that energy should be a free and inalienable right: they want free electricity, gasoline, heating oil, and propane. Some of them find a way to get it for free.

5. Most people have a basic mistrust of science, do not understand it or believe in it, nor want to use it. The exception scientific products being, of course: autos, smartphones, and nest thermostats!

ps I hope other people have ideas as I'm all tapped out! t

6. Gas is not at $5 a gallon

7. Most people have switched over to CFL's

8. No one likes maintaining their property, especially as the don't plan on being there beyond X years

9. Most people have been bitten by the slick window / radiant / solar fan /... salesmen & think most ads are snake oil

10. Very few people will switch out appliances unless they have a good reason to - if it isn't broke, don't fix it

11. It rarely is about saving money or energy for most people

 

Lawrence Berkley had a huge study done on "selling Energy Efficiency" which pretty well nailed it on the head - sorry I don't have the link handy but I am sure you can find the link here, my site or someone else might post it

Is this the study you're thinking of http://drivingdemand.lbl.gov/

That looks like it - Thanks Nick

 

I think that this study  may be more to the point on problems in "selling Energy Efficiency."

(See below)

  

Revealing Myths about People, Energy and Buildings

Rick Diamond and Mithra Moezzi

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

 

ABSTRACT

In this essay we take a closer look at the ways energy professionals and the public

alike, talk, write and think about how energy affects the way in which we design, operate,

retrofit and inhabit buildings. What are some of the myths about people, energy and buildings

that are current today? Who tells these myths and why do we believe them? How do myths

affect our behavior? Myths are a way of understanding the world we live in. They may

represent incomplete understanding, or be based on premises that are scientifically not valid,

but they help us understand and explain how the world works, and we shape our behavior  accordingly.

 

The second part of explanation 8 could stand on its own.  Nearly all employed people are subject to transfers by employers or choose to move in search of new opportunities.  They remain footloose, not rooted.  Investments in places are generally minimal/cosmetic.

I believe these are among the good reasons for public policies vis a vis home performance,

HVAC is one of the biggest things people can do as an energy upgrade, yet few people do until their old system finally dies. The contractor selling the system has no incentive to give the customer a lower power bill, just to sell more expensive equipment. The customers existing system has broke in the middle of summer, so little research is done on part of the customer they just want to be cool now for the lowest cost possible. Replacement systems are almost always oversized, yet the ductwork is never upgraded to accommodate the larger system. This leaves the customer with little if any energy savings when compared to their old system. After spending $5k+ on a new HVAC system w/o seeing any savings they basically think that low energy bills mean living a caveman lifestyle.

Think about it, how many high SEER (15+) systems have you seen that AREN'T substantially oversized?

Maybe the authors clientele-the utility company's-who pay for this publication- may have something to do with their bias in this study? ....... look behind the curtain Dorothy

William,

What bias do you detect in the press release?  And what is its effect?

The utilities have as much interest in weatherization as Monsanto has selling corn to Orval Redenbuacker.

That varies, as policies are different from state to state.

Just because we can build a better mouse trap doesn't mean people will beat a path to our websites. This stuff can be complicated, and people don't want complicated, they want easy. And shiny. And free (before the rebate). We're doomed as an industry as long as we continue to propose science based solutions, rather than something they can pick up at HD or Costco.

Sarcasm aside, I get that people don't want to spend money on this stuff, but I never anticipated how tough, even impossible it can be, to get them to simply change behavior. 

RSS

Featured Forum Discussions

Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?

Started by Steve in General Forum. Last reply by Walter Ahlgrim 23 hours ago. 3 Replies

Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.

Started by Daniel James Grundy in Training. Last reply by Daniel James Grundy yesterday. 5 Replies

BDT with vermiculite in hollow CMU walls?

Started by Brad Cook in General Forum. Last reply by John Nicholas yesterday. 2 Replies

Strange IR Image

Started by Larry Nissman in General Forum. Last reply by Brad Cook Mar 9. 7 Replies

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Sarah OConnell posted a blog post

Crowdsourcing for Innovation

Share Your Ideas!Novel Building Envelope Design for Increased Thermal PerformanceIn 2014, more than…See More
11 hours ago
Colin de Paor is now a member of Home Energy Pros
13 hours ago
Walter Ahlgrim replied to Steve's discussion Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?
"The 5 ton system you have is not 500 hp racecar engines they are 500 hp truck engines. The duct…"
23 hours ago
Daniel James Grundy replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"So I wanted to start with a basic who can help then go into more detail later. But yes find…"
yesterday
Daniel James Grundy replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"My tutor got back to me and while areas don't quite feel right a little to much assumptions…"
yesterday
Brennan Less replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"Daniel, I'm assuming you're trying to predict the airflows through the different openings…"
yesterday
Martin Newmark joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
yesterday
John Nicholas replied to Brad Cook's discussion BDT with vermiculite in hollow CMU walls?
"If the drywall is in good shape, you should have little worries about the 50pa depressurization…"
yesterday

Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service