This is a link to a recent article from a leading energy marketing firm that discusses a multi-year decline in energy-saving improvements:

http://sheltongrp.com/files/2013/04/2013-Utility-Pulse-Release2.pdf

 

It would be interesting to hear members comments and their own view.

 

 

Views: 923

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hello Jose,

I can give you my own original ideas to your question:

1. Most people find it boring to save energy.

2. Most people find people who save energy to be boring(that's how I'm perceived).

3. Most people prefer to spend their discretionary income on "fun" things: restaurants, entertainment, casino, auto, etc.

4. Most people believe that energy should be a free and inalienable right: they want free electricity, gasoline, heating oil, and propane. Some of them find a way to get it for free.

5. Most people have a basic mistrust of science, do not understand it or believe in it, nor want to use it. The exception scientific products being, of course: autos, smartphones, and nest thermostats!

ps I hope other people have ideas as I'm all tapped out! t

6. Gas is not at $5 a gallon

7. Most people have switched over to CFL's

8. No one likes maintaining their property, especially as the don't plan on being there beyond X years

9. Most people have been bitten by the slick window / radiant / solar fan /... salesmen & think most ads are snake oil

10. Very few people will switch out appliances unless they have a good reason to - if it isn't broke, don't fix it

11. It rarely is about saving money or energy for most people

 

Lawrence Berkley had a huge study done on "selling Energy Efficiency" which pretty well nailed it on the head - sorry I don't have the link handy but I am sure you can find the link here, my site or someone else might post it

Is this the study you're thinking of http://drivingdemand.lbl.gov/

That looks like it - Thanks Nick

 

I think that this study  may be more to the point on problems in "selling Energy Efficiency."

(See below)

  

Revealing Myths about People, Energy and Buildings

Rick Diamond and Mithra Moezzi

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

 

ABSTRACT

In this essay we take a closer look at the ways energy professionals and the public

alike, talk, write and think about how energy affects the way in which we design, operate,

retrofit and inhabit buildings. What are some of the myths about people, energy and buildings

that are current today? Who tells these myths and why do we believe them? How do myths

affect our behavior? Myths are a way of understanding the world we live in. They may

represent incomplete understanding, or be based on premises that are scientifically not valid,

but they help us understand and explain how the world works, and we shape our behavior  accordingly.

 

The second part of explanation 8 could stand on its own.  Nearly all employed people are subject to transfers by employers or choose to move in search of new opportunities.  They remain footloose, not rooted.  Investments in places are generally minimal/cosmetic.

I believe these are among the good reasons for public policies vis a vis home performance,

HVAC is one of the biggest things people can do as an energy upgrade, yet few people do until their old system finally dies. The contractor selling the system has no incentive to give the customer a lower power bill, just to sell more expensive equipment. The customers existing system has broke in the middle of summer, so little research is done on part of the customer they just want to be cool now for the lowest cost possible. Replacement systems are almost always oversized, yet the ductwork is never upgraded to accommodate the larger system. This leaves the customer with little if any energy savings when compared to their old system. After spending $5k+ on a new HVAC system w/o seeing any savings they basically think that low energy bills mean living a caveman lifestyle.

Think about it, how many high SEER (15+) systems have you seen that AREN'T substantially oversized?

Maybe the authors clientele-the utility company's-who pay for this publication- may have something to do with their bias in this study? ....... look behind the curtain Dorothy

William,

What bias do you detect in the press release?  And what is its effect?

The utilities have as much interest in weatherization as Monsanto has selling corn to Orval Redenbuacker.

That varies, as policies are different from state to state.

Just because we can build a better mouse trap doesn't mean people will beat a path to our websites. This stuff can be complicated, and people don't want complicated, they want easy. And shiny. And free (before the rebate). We're doomed as an industry as long as we continue to propose science based solutions, rather than something they can pick up at HD or Costco.

Sarcasm aside, I get that people don't want to spend money on this stuff, but I never anticipated how tough, even impossible it can be, to get them to simply change behavior. 

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

David Eakin replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"More food for thought on this subject - read this (fairly) recent blog by one of the most respected…"
2 hours ago
Curt Kinder commented on Christopher Morin's blog post 5 Things New Energy Efficiency HVAC Contractors Need to Know
"You left out air distribution...Without at least a passing glance at how much air moves through the…"
7 hours ago
David Eakin replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"I mis-spoke - I was referring to the Midori House in Santa Cruz. Have an in-depth discussion with…"
13 hours ago
Profile IconScot Davidson, j jarvella and Michael joined Home Energy Pros
20 hours ago
Kaushal Bharath Raju replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Hi David & Bud, $400/sqf > $300 sqf. The latter is the minimum cost of new construction in…"
21 hours ago
David Eakin replied to Kaushal Bharath Raju's discussion Affordability & Deep Energy Upgrade/Passive House Retrofit in Berkeley, California.
"Kaushal, There was a deep energy retrofit upgrade project (to Passive House standards) in San Jose…"
23 hours ago
Kim Tanner updated an event

Beyond Residential Testing at The Energy Conservatory

May 14, 2014 to May 16, 2014
The Energy Conservatory (TEC) is hosting a Beyond Residential Testing event. In addition we are…See More
yesterday
Casey Gesell posted a video

Super Attic - Attic Insulation System

http://www.drenergysaver.com | 1-888-225-6260 The new Super Attic: Advanced Conversion System -- converts your attic from a vented attic into an unvented at...
yesterday

Casey Gesell just added their location.
(via Member Map)

yesterday
H.O. Electric posted a video

H.O. Services, Generator, Electrical, Plumbing, Heating, Cooling, Belmont, Lexington, Arlington, MA

H.O. Services is your residential Electric-Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Specialist. We are an electrical contracting company providing homeowners the best Electr...
yesterday
Jim Gunshinan's blog post was featured
yesterday
Luis Hernandez posted a discussion

Air Source Heat pump or mini-split efficiency

Greetings everyone!    I have a technical questions I hope I could get some feedback! I understood…See More
yesterday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service