I have reviewed, tested, studied, asked, and analyzed the many facets of whole house air leakage.  I am still somewhat unsure what constitutes a respectable level of air leakage to a home.  Newer homes built to higher standards are not a problem but when you get into older homes with varying degrees of air leakage depending on when they were built and by whom presents some interesting situations.  The recommended rates of leakage on older homes do not present the same situation as new homes as there are many areas of the home which are not accessible and to properly be able to reduce the leakage to ASHRAE guidelines would mean in many cases a major teardown and reconstruction to be able to seal the leakage to the "standards".  In addition, many of these homes were built on the premise that the leakage would keep the wood and structure dry, minimizing those types of problems.

If you have suggestions, references and guidelines, please let me know.  Thank you for your input. 

Roy Sakamoto

Views: 714

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This jives with my experience trying to air seal a very small house - lots of caulk and foam and not much of a result (only a few hundred CFM after several hours of work).  Bigger homes seem easier to reduce in my experience.

This is definitely worth investigating if you are an air sealer and are forced to use the ACH50 metric.

First look at a 1500 ft2 ranch on a slab at 50'X30' with an 8' ceiling.  It has a volume of 12,000 ft3, and a surface area, all-in, of 4280 ft2.  If we divide the surface area by the volume, we get .36 - this is a measure of the number of square feet represented by each cubic foot of volume.

Then look at 3000 ft2 2-story on a basement at 50'X30' with 9' ceilings above grade.  It has a volume of 39,000 ft3 and a surface area of 7160 ft2.  Divide the surface area by the volume and we get .18.

So each cubic foot of the volume of the big house represents twice as much surface square footage as it does in the small house.  To reach the same 3 ACH50, each square foot of the smaller house must be 2 X as tight as the ones on the big house.  Or the way I like to phrase it, each square foot of the bigger house is allowed to by twice as leaky as that on the small house.

You can do the same exercise with that small house on a basement, with a house that is "U" shaped, with a long rectangle, with a square, etc.  And you can even see that the big house with 8' ceilings instead of 9' has a ratio of .19 - so just raising the ceiling a foot gives you a 5%+ advantage on the final air leakage number!

In MD that has had the '12 code for a year and 9 months, just last week I spoke with the head inspector of one of the counties.  He told me they still have a 30-40% failure rate and they are all houses under 2000 ft2.

Wrong metric.  

Hope we aren't hijacking the thread, but this applies to old houses as well as new.

RSS

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Chris Dorsi posted an event
47 minutes ago
Joe Crisara commented on Chris Laumer-Giddens's blog post A Solution for Fresh and Make-Up Air Happiness
"Great video Matt! I will pass this along to all of my students"
1 hour ago
Casey Gesell posted events
1 hour ago
Joe Crisara posted events
1 hour ago
john bustos commented on john bustos's photo
Thumbnail

20160205_171430

"Found this, and much, much more on a recent attic inspection."
2 hours ago
john bustos posted a photo
2 hours ago
Diane Chojnowski commented on Seventhwave's event Better homes video series
"You're welcome to post your videos here on Home Energy Pros."
2 hours ago
Quinn Korzeniecki replied to Quinn Korzeniecki's discussion 3 Energy Saving New Year’s Resolutions to Make in 2016
"Hi Sam, I'm glad you enjoyed the tips! I am a renter myself, so I can only follow along with…"
2 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service