RESNET has proposed an amendment to their standards to define the word "shall". The proposed amendment is open for public comment until this coming Monday the 24th. If you've had the opportunity (or misfortune) of hearing me talk about the use of shall, then you already know my case against it. If not, then buy me a beer at the next conference and I shall enlighten you. Or you can read comment #8.
Not only is Saturn advocating against the use of shall, we promoting the elimination of it in the standards wherever it exists. We owe it to the readers of the standards to be very clear in our meaning. Shall is anything but clear. Make your voice heard and post your comments at RESNET's website.

Views: 157

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Nice points, though they also need to list the one overriding exception which is if it conflicts with state rules & regulations. I also agree with some of the others, no matter if they do change the definition or decide to take your advice (which I agree with) is show all the changed locations & submit them all  

If language is not correct,

Then what is said is not what is meant.

If what is said is not what is meant,

Then what ought to be done remains undone.

- Confucius (551-479 BCE)

We already suffer from a dramatic loss of precision in language in modern life, and I see no need to further "dumb down" technical specifications and codes to the lowest common denominator.

"Shall" means to impose a duty or obligation on a person. "Must" means of necessity and is more appropriately applied to inanimate objects.

For instance: "The contractor shall comply with ASHRAE 62.2." because "ASHRAE 62.2 must be used as the standard."

On standards published by International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), requirements with "shall" are the mandatory requirements.

Interesting

Shall we use must or must we use shall

I am not a lawyer

I am not a philosopher or a king.

I shall not be required to use must

I must not be required to use shall

I have a hammer and it does not split hairs 

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Richard Beyer replied to Marc Tannenbaum's discussion Industry Veteran Michelle Knaszak Joins Dr. Energy Saver
"That's great news Mr. Tannenbaum! Aside from increasing your financial volume, who is…"
10 hours ago
Bob Blanchette replied to Bud Poll's discussion Basing air exchange on house volume??
"We do have exhaust only around here if you are referring to fart fans in bathrooms."
15 hours ago
Sean Lintow Sr replied to Bud Poll's discussion Basing air exchange on house volume??
"They can be found almost everywhere, it just depends on the contractor or individual in question as…"
17 hours ago
Steven Lewis replied to Bob Blanchette's discussion How does Cycles Per Hour affect real world AFUE?
"In my opinion you are trying to get very detailed about equipment that is designed to perform in a…"
yesterday
Brad Brenner posted a blog post
yesterday
Bob Blanchette commented on Dale Stephens's blog post LED Lighting 24-month update 18,240 hours & counting
"I'm also in the process of upgrading from CFL to LED. Energy cost difference gets "lost…"
yesterday
Bob Blanchette commented on Dale Stephens's blog post LED Lighting 24-month update 18,240 hours & counting
"A couple questions on your power bills:1: All-Electric house or gas heat/water…"
yesterday
Bob Blanchette replied to Bud Poll's discussion Basing air exchange on house volume??
"Where to you live that has all these air exchangers. I have NEVER seen one installed in a house.…"
yesterday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service