RESNET has proposed an amendment to their standards to define the word "shall". The proposed amendment is open for public comment until this coming Monday the 24th. If you've had the opportunity (or misfortune) of hearing me talk about the use of shall, then you already know my case against it. If not, then buy me a beer at the next conference and I shall enlighten you. Or you can read comment #8.
Not only is Saturn advocating against the use of shall, we promoting the elimination of it in the standards wherever it exists. We owe it to the readers of the standards to be very clear in our meaning. Shall is anything but clear. Make your voice heard and post your comments at RESNET's website.

Views: 158

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Nice points, though they also need to list the one overriding exception which is if it conflicts with state rules & regulations. I also agree with some of the others, no matter if they do change the definition or decide to take your advice (which I agree with) is show all the changed locations & submit them all  

If language is not correct,

Then what is said is not what is meant.

If what is said is not what is meant,

Then what ought to be done remains undone.

- Confucius (551-479 BCE)

We already suffer from a dramatic loss of precision in language in modern life, and I see no need to further "dumb down" technical specifications and codes to the lowest common denominator.

"Shall" means to impose a duty or obligation on a person. "Must" means of necessity and is more appropriately applied to inanimate objects.

For instance: "The contractor shall comply with ASHRAE 62.2." because "ASHRAE 62.2 must be used as the standard."

On standards published by International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), requirements with "shall" are the mandatory requirements.

Interesting

Shall we use must or must we use shall

I am not a lawyer

I am not a philosopher or a king.

I shall not be required to use must

I must not be required to use shall

I have a hammer and it does not split hairs 

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Craig Savage replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"If you must eliminate the drainage plane, you might consider using one of the WRB's…"
2 minutes ago
Patrick Michaelyan replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"Thank you all for your input. It confirms my suspicions. I had originally recommended removing the…"
21 minutes ago
Kurt Albershardt replied to Brady Mills's discussion Can someone recommend a whole home water filtration system?
"Excellent advice on the testing -- you can't treat what you don't know about. A softener…"
1 hour ago
Joe Nebbia replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"I wouldn't agree that the energy benefit is worthless.  A study that we did for he…"
2 hours ago
Craig Savage replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"Sean is spot on. I would only add that the best bang from your residing dollar will come as a…"
2 hours ago
Tom Mallard replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"A workaround if having to use a siding type that traps moisture is simply using furring strips…"
2 hours ago
Kohta Ueno replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Vinyl Siding with Integral Insulation
"Another reason to avoid insulated vinyl siding, besides the middling R value improvement, is that…"
2 hours ago
Profile IconLauren Marburger, Bryan L Hanson, Deena Cook and 3 more joined Home Energy Pros
3 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service