TREAT modeling of mid-rise apartments low heating load

Does anyone have experience using TREAT to model mid-rise (3-story) apartment buildings with interior corridors?  Our housing authority requires true-ing up the "calculate model" heating load consumption to the "calculate billing" heating load consumption.  TREAT's analysis of the monthly consumption figures come out with a baseload that's too high and heating load that's too low (8 kBTU/SF), I say this is based on temperatures observed during the site survey which show that the seniors in this complex have heat on year round.   When I change the thermostats to 75 and the heating season to year round the model's heating load goes up, but of course, the billing analysis does not change and then I can't true up.

I need to have additional justifiable rationale for them to accept my base and heating loads over TREAT's (in addition to my observed conditions).  Has anyone had to do this and does your experience show the same problem with mid-rise, interior corridor buildings?  do you know of any third party info to support me?

I do not have this problem at all with apartment style or townhouse style buildings.

Thank you!

Tags: TREAT, calibrating, modeling, trueing, up

Views: 132

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Where is this going?  Are you (the housing authority) trying to set the Utility Allowance?  Somewhere else?  

All electric?  Balanced Power?  Does each apt have specific DHW, heat and cool?  Are they metered individually? or some type of master meter system?  What size are the apts and what climate zone?  Are you getting the same results for a top floor end unit as a middle floor middle unit?

Hi John - I'm strictly modeling the entire building, not individual units. I'm looking for a justifiable rationale to increase heating load to a more realistic level (based on observed apartment temperatures and my experience) to increase savings and obtain rebates for the housing authority (SIR>1) but TREAT picks an unrealistically low heating load based strictly on its billing analysis and it does not consider tenant behavior, setpoints, etc in that billing analysis.  I'm looking for anyone else's experience with this issue...

This isn't uncommon -- senior buildings often have lower-than-typical baseload use; especially for domestic hot water.

More generally, though -- TREAT DOES have inputs for t-stat settings, water heater settings, space heating schedules, etc. I haven't used it heavily for a few years (We used v. 3.3.1 -- the current version is 3.5). But even that had tweaks for ridiculously detailed inputs -- whether there were dishwashers, which are more efficient than hand-washing dishes, not just t-stat setpoints, but also inputs for setbacks for heating and A/C, inputs for plug load as well as hard-wired electric loads, and on and on.

The process of truing up a model in TREAT can be ENORMOUSLY educational. After all, the utility bills don't lie... Read through the documentation enough to find out what you aren't accounting for, and make that true-up process work for you the way it's supposed to...

So why is tenant behavior significantly different in this building?

RSS

Groups

Latest Activity

Efficiency First California posted a blog post
54 minutes ago
Lindsay Bachman is now a member of Home Energy Pros
2 hours ago
Alfie Davis posted a blog post
Tuesday
Profile IconSam Compton, Cameron Home Insulation, Seth Shoneman and 2 more joined Home Energy Pros
Monday
Home Energy Magazine's blog post was featured
Monday
Eric Kjelshus replied to Gregory Cisco's discussion Abandoning under-slab HVAC ductwork which fills with groundwater seasonally.
"In Kansas City a lot of "cardboard" for supply was used in slab on grade.  1950-1970…"
Friday
Richard L. Rue replied to Sonja Persram's discussion Energy Savings Guarantee for single family dwellings in cold climate??
"Try EnergyWise Structures (www.energywisestructures.com) They are a NASA spin-off company that has…"
Sep 15
Debra Little commented on Home Energy Magazine's blog post NREL Research Finds That 22% of New Homes Completed in the U.S. in 2016 Were HERS Rated
"The avg scores are interesting. Are there comparative numbers for previous years? I thought they…"
Sep 15

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service