I'm interested to know if the State you live in requires Blower door testing of the residential building envelope on new construction?

Here in Washington State the Code official in the jurisdiction has the right to require third party testing but none do so.

As a consequence of that situation the insulation contractors are usually chosen to perform the blower door testing at Final inspection and there is no system of verification in place. 

It is not my intent to imply wrong doing with this process but in my opinion this is not a good arrangement.  The insulation contractor runs the risk of losing future jobs when blower door tests fail at Final inspection.

The State of California requires third party testing by a HERS rater and anyone under contract otherwise is not allowed to submit test results.  This to me seems like a logical arrangement.

We create these code requirements to provide for a better/safer future then give them no teeth in implementation.

If your jurisdiction requires third party testing I would love to know about it.  I could use some feed back as grist for the mill when submitting for this code change before our State Building Code Council.

Views: 127

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Most of the states I know that require testing allow HERS Raters, those with BPI certifications (though they never teach duct testing except for 1 class) and those that go through a DET certifier course (HVAC / Builders / Insulation companies / etc..) to do the testing.

Is having an individual that has a vested interest in the result the best choice? Might not be depending on that company but in many cases they also can see what they can improve. Along those lines just because you have a third party, that doesn't mean they might not fudge the numbers also. The best one I have heard of is an inspection office in our area that has the equipment & spot checks the results - if you are off they can quite simply say, no more

As for the insulation component -  unless they are fully responsible for air sealing (which actually every trade should be) they shouldn't really lose any jobs for a failed result.

Thanks for your reply.  As for duct testing I reluctantly admit that the better scenario from a cost perspective is to have the installer provide testing results.  I don't like that but with regard to practicality it probably makes  the most sense since they're already there.  What I'm referring to is envelope testing.  The insulation installers must come back anyway to conduct the blower door test.  We all want to see the best results from the testing and having someone under contract for additional services is not, in my opinion the best case scenario.  The State of California has had third party testing rq'd since 2004  ( I think).  They explain their rqmt in their Title 24 of their energy code.

Let's say that as per your suggestion the insulation installers are on the hook for sealing measures (which they are not in WA.. that task is completed by a separate entity)  What is the solution for a failed test at Final?  Will they then dismantle the interior to seal ( for instance) penetrations between conditioned space and the garage?  Tear off siding to further seal the rim joist? Remove attic insulation to increase attic sealing? or...........simply state that the project passed.  Remember, there is no verification system in place to come back in after homeowners have moved in. Lastly, would you please further explain the motivation a third party tester would have for fudging the numbers?  Thanks much.

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

George Matthews replied to George Matthews's discussion Shortridge 8400 Flowhood for A/C airflow testing in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Here are the pics of the flowhood and airdata manometer"
yesterday
Sarah Holloway posted a photo
yesterday
Joe Urycki added a discussion to the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
Thumbnail

TEC blower door and UEI combustion analyzer for sale

For sale is one used TEC Minneapolis blower door system: Includes model 3 fan with rings A and B,…See More
yesterday
John Nicholas replied to Kevin Emerson's discussion Studies re: radon mitigation and energy efficiency
"The Nay side is well represented with the links already posted. I presented a neutral side, with…"
yesterday
Ray Lehman replied to Kevin Emerson's discussion Studies re: radon mitigation and energy efficiency
"Hey John, Thanks for the information.  Very good empirical data. While I agree that running…"
Friday
John Nicholas replied to Kevin Emerson's discussion Studies re: radon mitigation and energy efficiency
"I have no links, just some anecdotal evidence. I had several Blower Door Tests done on my own home.…"
Friday
Chris Laumer-Giddens commented on Chris Laumer-Giddens's blog post Raising the BARrier in North Carolina Mountain Home, Air Tight Ceiling
"@Joe Nagan, We have found this technique to be WAY simpler and A LOT less labor than making a…"
Thursday
Judy Rachel replied to Blake Shurtz's discussion Testing spillage on induced draft furnace?
"I hope the attached picture is clear enough for you to see.  As the caption on the picture…"
Thursday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service