I'm interested to know if the State you live in requires Blower door testing of the residential building envelope on new construction?

Here in Washington State the Code official in the jurisdiction has the right to require third party testing but none do so.

As a consequence of that situation the insulation contractors are usually chosen to perform the blower door testing at Final inspection and there is no system of verification in place. 

It is not my intent to imply wrong doing with this process but in my opinion this is not a good arrangement.  The insulation contractor runs the risk of losing future jobs when blower door tests fail at Final inspection.

The State of California requires third party testing by a HERS rater and anyone under contract otherwise is not allowed to submit test results.  This to me seems like a logical arrangement.

We create these code requirements to provide for a better/safer future then give them no teeth in implementation.

If your jurisdiction requires third party testing I would love to know about it.  I could use some feed back as grist for the mill when submitting for this code change before our State Building Code Council.

Views: 101

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Most of the states I know that require testing allow HERS Raters, those with BPI certifications (though they never teach duct testing except for 1 class) and those that go through a DET certifier course (HVAC / Builders / Insulation companies / etc..) to do the testing.

Is having an individual that has a vested interest in the result the best choice? Might not be depending on that company but in many cases they also can see what they can improve. Along those lines just because you have a third party, that doesn't mean they might not fudge the numbers also. The best one I have heard of is an inspection office in our area that has the equipment & spot checks the results - if you are off they can quite simply say, no more

As for the insulation component -  unless they are fully responsible for air sealing (which actually every trade should be) they shouldn't really lose any jobs for a failed result.

Thanks for your reply.  As for duct testing I reluctantly admit that the better scenario from a cost perspective is to have the installer provide testing results.  I don't like that but with regard to practicality it probably makes  the most sense since they're already there.  What I'm referring to is envelope testing.  The insulation installers must come back anyway to conduct the blower door test.  We all want to see the best results from the testing and having someone under contract for additional services is not, in my opinion the best case scenario.  The State of California has had third party testing rq'd since 2004  ( I think).  They explain their rqmt in their Title 24 of their energy code.

Let's say that as per your suggestion the insulation installers are on the hook for sealing measures (which they are not in WA.. that task is completed by a separate entity)  What is the solution for a failed test at Final?  Will they then dismantle the interior to seal ( for instance) penetrations between conditioned space and the garage?  Tear off siding to further seal the rim joist? Remove attic insulation to increase attic sealing? or...........simply state that the project passed.  Remember, there is no verification system in place to come back in after homeowners have moved in. Lastly, would you please further explain the motivation a third party tester would have for fudging the numbers?  Thanks much.

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

Richard C. MacCrea replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"Most of the posts here are far too narrow in scope. To make the best decision you need to…"
13 hours ago
Tom Mallard replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"Thx, Jose, add in u"
15 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"Thankless water heaters are a GREAT deal.... For the installers. They are usually very…"
16 hours ago
Jose Carreno replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"I have been working with RUUD/RHEEM tank less water heaters (0.94 energy factor) with excellent…"
18 hours ago
Profile IconColleen Neel, Sarah Mostafa, Michael Kelemen and 4 more joined Home Energy Pros
19 hours ago
David I. Shepherd-Gaw replied to Ryan Miller's discussion Wouldn't it make more sense to post jobs on a single board nationally? in the group Job Board
"I have managed and overseen several efforts with www.energyexpert.org and other similar sites. It…"
20 hours ago
David Baerg replied to Bachi Brunato's discussion Modeling a Gas Fireplace in Wrightsoft
"I would not include it.  Given that it is likely much less efficient than the gas furnace, you…"
22 hours ago
Ryan Miller posted a discussion

First NC and now GA - Building Performance Associations taking shape

Hi All - Just a quick "this is what we're up to" for the community.The NC Building Performance…See More
22 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service