Take the truckload of chocolate away from the 5 year olds.

Does anyone else feel the present precipitous drop in energy costs in these United States is a catastrophe? 

Does anyone else feel the US Gov is once again missing the opportunity of a lifetime to fix at least 2 problems with one move? 

Does anyone else feel that with energy prices dropping, more consumers, corporate and private, will gorge on energy again? 

How do we prevent that?  How do we reduce the deficit?  How do we keep the public thinking about conservation in a time of gluttony? 

I think it is time for the US to adapt an energy tax, similar to any other vice tax.  They tax liquor, cigarettes, and gambling, why not energy?  An energy tax could be either a carbon tax or a per unit tax on the consumption of energy.  It is needed so consumers do not get the idea that energy is once again cheap and limitless.  

Pick a date in the past three years to 'normalize' energy prices to and make the tax adjust semiannually to make the price paid equal that number.  Any differential between consumer price and fair market price goes to the Government.  When the fair market price equals the normalized price the tax expires.  Fair market price is set by futures trading globally.  Normalized consumer price equals inflation adjusted energy prices from 2013. People don't get a shock because they have been paying those prices and surviving fine doing it.   This approach would guarantee the tax does expire when energy costs rebound, and consumers aren't stuck with stuff they cannot use when the energy prices rebound.  It also stabilizes energy cost for everyone. 

We could use funds from the energy tax to fix the millions of bridges we have ready to fall down or a lot of other stimulus type adventures, including incentives for conservation and R&D on renewables. 

It is government negligence for the price of fuel to continue to drop to the point where consumers think it is OK to do dumb things with energy.  Heat the driveway, buy a Hummer, put a heated outdoor pool in your lakeside home, etc.  Energy is cheap!!  Hooray!. 

It is time for an adult to take the truckload of chocolate away from the 5 year olds. 

Views: 333

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


This is a great way of saying it! Well done. You know the vast majority of us here on HEP agree with you - we're the choir. Your headline is such a great attention getter, a hook. I recommend you send this letter to your local and not-so-local newspapers' letter-to-the-editor sections. They will very likely publish it. And THAT will have an impact that will ripple through the pond.

“stuck with stuff they cannot use when the energy prices reboundThis is the peril of energy addiction. We are building our entire lives on the assumption that some commodity will remain at the same price level. It is more about risks than savings and it looks like it is not an issue that can be handled at the individual level. I am not a pro-government-intervention person but in this specific case, I think it is needed. Taxing lavish use of energy and using the ravenue for rebates to encourage efficient stuff is a good idea.

Someone told me Naomi Klein's new book has a passage about how high energy prices drive extreme fossil fuel extraction, and reward it. In North America, much of this extreme extraction is in or near Native Americans' lands. So low prices could paradoxically buy some time for these peoples and others to question the environmental cost of extreme extraction approaches.  I have not read the book yet but heard this.

Yes, very good, attention getting headline!

But the good news is that lower fuel prices:

will free up more $$ for the lower and middle class to spend on important things and help the economy

will create a disincentive for the Keystone Pipeline and Hydrofracting

it might free up enough money for more homeowners to invest in energy efficiency

and the bad news is:

it will incite the Republican majority, who already do not believe in Global Warming and believe that there should be less government intervention

As for "Heat the driveway, buy a Hummer, put a heated outdoor pool in your lakeside home, etc.  Energy is cheap!!  Hooray!" I know many second homeowners in this resort town that have the huge outdoor hot tub, the heated walkways, the house never below 65 deg., even if nobody is there for months. They may complain about the cost of fuel but are not interested in changing anything.

How about simply getting the government out of the energy business altogether? End ALL energy subsidies. Currently we pay a large portion of the real energy cost in our income tax bill (aka government subsidies and war). Let energy prices go to their natural levels and let the ENTIRE cost be reflected in utility bills.

That sounds good, but like my original idea here, it is futile. 235 representatives, 100 senators, 9 justices, 1 president. If you can buy 345 people, you can run the country. Last I heard Microsoft was sitting on a 40 billion war chest. Exxon probably gets that quarterly, as do the banks. A cheap election costs the victor several million dollars to rig, er... finance, that victor gets a salary south of 200K per year. If he/she is a congressperson, that contract is 2 years long. Senators get 6 years, presidents 4.
None of the people in power want this to change. I am not talking about public officials here, I am talking about the multi billionairres who continue to profit from the status quo.


Featured Forum Discussions

Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?

Started by Steve in General Forum. Last reply by Eric Kjelshus yesterday. 4 Replies

Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.

Started by Daniel James Grundy in Training. Last reply by Daniel James Grundy on Thursday. 5 Replies

BDT with vermiculite in hollow CMU walls?

Started by Brad Cook in General Forum. Last reply by John Nicholas on Thursday. 2 Replies

Strange IR Image

Started by Larry Nissman in General Forum. Last reply by Brad Cook Mar 9. 7 Replies


  • Add Videos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Derrick Brodanex joined allen p tanner's group

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
19 hours ago
Eric Kjelshus replied to Steve's discussion Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?
"Its more about run time with high RH removing, than to large over sized AC unit, in houses.  …"
Sarah OConnell posted a blog post

Crowdsourcing for Innovation

Share Your Ideas!Novel Building Envelope Design for Increased Thermal PerformanceIn 2014, more than…See More
Colin de Paor is now a member of Home Energy Pros
Walter Ahlgrim replied to Steve's discussion Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?
"The 5 ton system you have is not 500 hp racecar engines they are 500 hp truck engines. The duct…"
Daniel James Grundy replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"So I wanted to start with a basic who can help then go into more detail later. But yes find…"
Daniel James Grundy replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"My tutor got back to me and while areas don't quite feel right a little to much assumptions…"
Brennan Less replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"Daniel, I'm assuming you're trying to predict the airflows through the different openings…"

Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service