This month's stump the chump comes from a mystery contributor, a caped crusading building performance specialist from Burlington, Vermont.

During a recent job, the crusader was reminded of a stumper he encountered in the late 1990's.

The homeowners of a 19th century duplex were in trouble; victims of uncomfortable rooms and high energy bills. With their patience wearing thin, they called in the local home performance hero to upgrade the shell of their home. The scope of work included significant infiltration reduction; upgrading thin rockwool attic insulation to R40; dense-packing 2x6 finished slanted ceilings with cellulose; dense-packing 2x4 exterior walls with cellulose; dense-packing the perimeter of the 2nd floor framing system with cellulose; R19 bandjoist insulation; and a few other minor things.

Click here to read more.

Tags: BPI, Chump, Stump, the

Views: 397

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What happened to my reply? What I had posted was that this month's stumper was a coincidence in that I am presently working on a similar home. The home I'm working on also has high heating bills, uncomfortable rooms, and a one pipe steam heating system. I'm thinking the solution is to install thermostatic radiator valves in the overheated rooms. Those upstairs rooms feel like a sauna, even though the first floor, where the t-stat is, is only at 72 degrees f. Having the rest of the home at a higher delta T to outside greatly increases heating costs. 

It is still there - it just happens to be under the BPI group where they pasted the exact same question, etc... Eventually they will learn net etiquette, but until then...  

I am also very interested in the comments as I have been living in a 1930's two-story home with a single-pipe steam/natural gas system for over 30 years.  I have also done some extensive air sealing and insulating (but I know more can be done) but we HAVE seen a tremendous decrease in our natural gas usage. Since the clues are that the amount of gas used has not changed even after all the remediation, it seems there is still a large loss of heated air (so that the heating system needs to make that up). My guess (based on an assumed age of the dwelling because of a single-pipe system) is that there is a fireplace flue (or 3) that are mostly/completely open and now (with the remediated air leakage work) are flowing even more air 24/7. If so, I'd recommend inflatable flue blocking devices for all fireplace flues. 

You may very well be right, considering the fact that they usually leave something out in those quiz questions, or deliberately mislead, such as they say they accomplished "significant infiltration reduction". It would not surprise me for them to come out with the answer as "there was significant infiltration increased".

I'm thinking the crusader eliminated one of the two steam boilers (or resized and installed a new, high
efficiency boiler) to handle heating both units in the duplex.  By incorporating zone valves and
separate thermostats, the clients no longer have to run two separate boilers
(both of which may have already been oversized), to efficiently heat the entire
duplex.

Perhaps the 2nd time around the local home performance hero (LHPH) decided to insulate the heating pipes and / or the foundation walls.  I am of course assuming the pipes were probably proximate to an un-insulated / un-air sealed foundation. 

Somebody want to tell me how much the final "simple upgrade" cost? What was the SIR on that upgrade? I would venture to say that this upgrade was very non-cost-effective. BPI should be promoting cost-effective remedies. Replacing a working steam boiler with a hot water boiler, along with an expensive repiping of the radiators is not a cost effective solution. They could have achieved 30% savings just with installing TRV's, and with a simple payback of one or two seasons, as opposed to the likely-to-never-have-a-payback upgrade endorsed in the Stump the chump game. 

Well it just came out & I quote... "He explains that our crusader “upgraded the two single pipe steam boilers to hot water boilers by modifying the distribution piping and adding a pipe to each of the radiators.  This allowed the boiler to heat the space without having to boil the water to make steam, which uses much less energy.  With the above upgrades, and keeping in mind that only hot water boilers can be low mass, which modulates output design, the savings can be quite substantial."

Then it sounds like he kept the existing boiler? I read it wrong then; my bad. 

OK - he kept the boilers, but the labor to extend the returns to every radiator would have been a tremendous labor/material cost (not to mention eyesore). And how did the hot water get to the radiators?  He would have needed to add at least 2 circulation pumps (1 for each system); maybe 2 manifold systems (1 for each system) too if the home owner wanted more than 1 zone. Unless he was relying on thermo siphon action. I really have a hard time believing that any net savings occurred here.

RSS

Featured Forum Discussions

Glass Block Windows

Started by Ken Kalke in Best Practices. Last reply by Sean Lintow Sr on Saturday. 1 Reply

What's the Most Profitable HVAC Job for Your Company?

Started by Wayne Melancon in HVAC. Last reply by Ken Kalke on Friday. 1 Reply

Lighting replacement - 300 watt LED flood light

Started by Mary Sinkler in General Forum. Last reply by Eric Kjelshus on Friday. 1 Reply

EZ Green Home is Hiring!

Started by Chloe Chapman in General Forum Jan 5. 0 Replies

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Ira Eisenstein replied to tedkidd's discussion Home Performance is Failing - let's turn that around?
"I have been a home inspector since 2003 and evolved into energy related issues and became a home…"
1 hour ago
Ira Eisenstein liked tedkidd's discussion Home Performance is Failing - let's turn that around?
1 hour ago
Bruce Fillmore joined Diane Chojnowski's group
Thumbnail

Home Energy Pros on Twitter

We've created a twitter list of members of Home Energy Pros who tweet about home performance and…See More
3 hours ago
Bruce Fillmore posted photos
3 hours ago
Profile IconMark Freeman and Bruce Fillmore joined Home Energy Pros
21 hours ago
Sean Lintow Sr replied to Ken Kalke's discussion Glass Block Windows
"Well as most I know (if not all) wont meet the energy code - none and for those that do opt…"
Saturday
Steve Gadsby posted a photo
Friday
Steve Gadsby commented on Perry Ning's blog post Warnings About Portable Air Conditioners
"We couldn't agree more about the problems caused by portable air conditioners. Here at Canada…"
Friday

Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service