Hi Everyone,


I was looking for some additional background on the proposed LIHEAP cuts I'm hearing about in the new Federal budget.  Supposedly the proposed reduction is quite large, on the order of several billion dollars.  I'm assuming this is across the country, not state specific.  Is it just fuel assistance that's threatened or are there other areas within weatherization & energy that are potentially targeted which are not being mentioned?

 

Thank you for any information you may have.

 

Matt Schwoegler

Tags: LIHEAP, budget

Views: 112

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I am looking for info on this same topic, the article in our local paper kind of skimmed the topic and was not very specific. I do think that the WAP funds are in place until march of next year, after that, that is the question. i would love some feedback on the same topic.

 

Thank You Joe

Yes, very interesting , It was suggested last week at a conference in DC expect WAP to fall off a cliff March 2012...sadly . Unsure the specifics on LIHEAP cuts but approx 50% cut of 2.5 bil from current 5.1 bil

Earlier the DOE EE/RE Progress alert came out containing  Energy Budget proposal- Not Nearly as ridiculous as what those on the RIGHT seek...steeper cuts to the EPA,  Energy Star and related programs. I skimmed the alert and one thing that stuck out is over $100 Billion for nuclear w $38 Bil Loan guarantees for 9 reactors through 2014? yikes

Sounds like many states are speaking up in oposition to LIHEAP cuts...

I agree with Joe that WAP funds are in place until 3/12 unless republicans can retrieve unspent Recovery act $

Many budget highlights - energy.gov

THanks Matt for starting this discussion.

The U.S. imported 61 percent of its oil in 2010, or 4.25 billion barrels.  We exported approximately $337 billion to foreign countries to pay for that oil.  That’s an average American’s annual salary of $50k gone every 5 seconds! That’s the whole 2 years worth of ARRA funding ($5B) spent in 5-1/2 days!  We don’t import oil, we export money. 

 

It would help to look at the LIHEAP program differently.  If we view it as just one facet of a greater program to reduce our dependency on foreign energy, reduce our trade deficit, increase national security and strengthen our economy, then it looks pretty good.  Those opposed to LIHEAP may see it as a social program, but those that support it also see LIHEAP as part of a larger energy security program.

 

Two-thirds of the Senators are already speaking out against LIHEAP cuts.  I doubt it will get much traction during bitter cold spells.  I expect to see much more news about WAP funding cuts come warm weather. To say the least, it's going to get interesting...

Thanks for the information, Mike.  Trying to find links, but not much coverage in the media, at least that I can see.

 


Dale,

 

"Two-thirds of the Senators are already speaking out against LIHEAP cuts.  I doubt it will get much traction during bitter cold spells.  I expect to see much more news about WAP funding cuts come warm weather. To say the least, it's going to get interesting..."

 

It's frustrating re: WAP funding cuts.  I too see LIHEAP as something that helps those with a real need, but also agree that it can help promote national security, making the program more attractive.  Having said that, why WAP is not a priority boggles my mind.  All those LIHEAP funds going to buy fuel oil that's just going to leak right out of the house which isn't weatherized properly to begin with...feels like we're putting the cart before the horse.

There's over 120 million homes in America, and under ARRA the national Weatherization Assistance Program is improving 1,000 homes a day.  We should get to them all in 329 years at this rate.

 

The average American uses 4-5% of their income to pay for energy costs, but low-income people pay more like 14% or more of their income towards energy bills.  LIHEAP and WAP often work in concert to help low-income clients cover their energy costs and reduce their energy bills.

 

Even though many agencies are scrambling to perform weatherization triage on as many homes as possible, folks need to stay warm until their homes get weatherized. 

Matt,

 

I have not yet been able to find the details of the proposed budget yet to see how it is to be executed, but it does appear that it is a 50% cut in spending. (I honestly have not had time to dig into it.)  I assume that the details will be posted on the White House Office of Management and  Budget within the week, however... if they are not already... especially with so many lawmakers already speaking up asking "Are you sure that is a good idea?"

 

Have you tried looking here?

 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Overview/

 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/ass...

 

Regards,

 

Michael

RSS

Featured Forum Discussions

Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?

Started by Steve in General Forum. Last reply by Walter Ahlgrim 12 hours ago. 3 Replies

Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.

Started by Daniel James Grundy in Training. Last reply by Daniel James Grundy 17 hours ago. 5 Replies

BDT with vermiculite in hollow CMU walls?

Started by Brad Cook in General Forum. Last reply by John Nicholas 23 hours ago. 2 Replies

Strange IR Image

Started by Larry Nissman in General Forum. Last reply by Brad Cook Mar 9. 7 Replies

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Sarah OConnell posted a blog post

Crowdsourcing for Innovation

Share Your Ideas!Novel Building Envelope Design for Increased Thermal PerformanceIn 2014, more than…See More
1 hour ago
Colin de Paor is now a member of Home Energy Pros
3 hours ago
Walter Ahlgrim replied to Steve's discussion Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?
"The 5 ton system you have is not 500 hp racecar engines they are 500 hp truck engines. The duct…"
12 hours ago
Daniel James Grundy replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"So I wanted to start with a basic who can help then go into more detail later. But yes find…"
17 hours ago
Daniel James Grundy replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"My tutor got back to me and while areas don't quite feel right a little to much assumptions…"
17 hours ago
Brennan Less replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"Daniel, I'm assuming you're trying to predict the airflows through the different openings…"
19 hours ago
Martin Newmark joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
21 hours ago
John Nicholas replied to Brad Cook's discussion BDT with vermiculite in hollow CMU walls?
"If the drywall is in good shape, you should have little worries about the 50pa depressurization…"
23 hours ago

Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service