Realtor and Lender networking value for HERS raters?

I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind around the benefit of investing time/energy into developing a strong  network of Realtors and financial lending institutions. 

Aside from markets where ratings are required when property changes hands, what's the value?

Is it just so they can refer you as a resource to their clients who are looking for practical energy upgrade ideas or for energy performance pre-purchase inspections?   

In the MA market, the 'free' utility audits set the bar low so that these referral opportunities for detailed ratings are very limited. 

Thanks for any thoughts you have on this

Adin 

Views: 219

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think the residential energy efficiency market is missing the boat by not doing more "pre-purchase" energy audits.  There are loans to accommodate buyers that want to do energy upgrades and have the cost tied into the mortgage.  Real estate agents need to know how streamline this process can be and how happy it can make their clients. It doesn't delay closing, the work is done within 90 days after closing. Contractors / auditors should be reaching out to Realtors to build on this idea, increasing the number of energy audits and home improvement jobs - and most Realtors already have their financial networks established.  

I think you are smart to be skeptical about this. Most Realtors are highly 'value conscious', and to date most raters just haven't been able to demonstrate enough of a value proposition beyond the range of services offered by traditional home inspectors during escrow. 'Good enough' is always the enemy of 'better'.

That said, Realtors are community superconductors, and as effective networkers they're second to none. So if you can show that your ratings deliver real value (i.e., better/faster/cheaper) and you're trustworthy, you'll find no better allies than Realtors to help you sell them... at least in those cases where they make the most sense (which from a Realtor's perspective might well be after the close of escrow).

As for buyer-paid pre-sale inspections, cultivating prospective buyers directly may be your best strategy, or at least a complementary one. Experienced home inspectors often do this to improve their independence and sell more higher priced, value-added services. However, to be cost-effective this requires an entirely different set of marketing skills. Here, the 'green lifestyle' and move-up segment buyers are probably your best targets. 

Without a mandate, seller-paid pre-sale ratings only make sense in those rare cases where unless a rating is available to appraisers, they will be apt to undervalue the home's unusual (above-market) efficiency enhancements. The trouble is, unless the sellers themselves already realize this, only EcoBrokers or NAR Green Realtors are likely to be able to recognize such a listing when they get one. And as we know, far too many supposedly "green" homes just don't have the HERS scores to prove it; so a pre-sale rating can still be risky for sellers, even in cases like these.

Originators offer an entirely different set of challenges. I've heard reports of raters becoming captive to a particular EEM broker, relying on leads or even kickbacks, to the point where the value they end up offering their clients becomes questionable. If EEM's have a significant share potential in your market, then cultivating the lenders who are writing them might make sense as part of a diversification plan, but I'd be reluctant to build too much of your business around it. 

Finally, I completely agree with you about 'free' audits; on again/off again audit subsidies just kill any chance of stabilizing this market.

RSS

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Profile IconKarin Haerter and Juan joined Home Energy Pros
19 minutes ago
Caoimhin P Connell replied to Rodney Fox's discussion Radon: Truth vs. Myth
"Good morning, Mr. Cullen – As I mentioned in another post – for the purposes under…"
31 minutes ago
tedkidd replied to Rodney Fox's discussion Radon: Truth vs. Myth
"If putting the house under positive pressure using fresh air helps mitigate not just radon, but…"
1 hour ago
Rich Manning replied to Rodney Fox's discussion Radon: Truth vs. Myth
"Tell them the truth as you know it, and back it up with the facts!!"
1 hour ago
Rich Manning replied to Charles Ryan Weitzel's discussion Oil Fired Boiler Being Used as the Heating Source in Two Air Handlers of a Historic Home
"Yes, its a Hydro-air system. It uses one boiler to supply hot water to the coil in the supply side…"
1 hour ago
tedkidd replied to Rodney Fox's discussion Radon: Truth vs. Myth
";) I love uncovering absuedities... Funny how creatively and vehemently people will argue against…"
1 hour ago
Rich Manning replied to Rodney Fox's discussion Radon: Truth vs. Myth
"Ted, you did it again! I would say that there's nothing like explaining the facts, but that…"
2 hours ago
Rodney Fox liked Rodney Fox's discussion Radon: Truth vs. Myth
2 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service