Real data on the magic of Low E coatings for cold climates?

I bet most of you are familiar with the claims of the window industry marketing a Low-E coating as a Cure-All for any house, any climate and any window, no matter what direction it faces. 

You have likely seen the heat lamp test that make people think that their products have some serious insulating properties. 

While I am not doubting on the effectiveness of Low E coating for cooling-dominating climates (installed on the windows that the Sun shines through) I have real doubts on how effective it is for cold climates.

There is a claim that a HUGE portion of the heat that escapes through a window does so in the form of radiant heat and Low E coating reduces it. 

I am sure Low E is very effective for reducing radiant heat loss. I am very skeptical on the size of the portion of the escaping heat being radiant.

And then I am also thinking that all the rejected solar gain in the winter must be greater than the amount of heat we trapped inside. (just because Sun's surface is about 10 000F vs 68F for the surface of the objects inside a home)

I bet many of us would benefit from reputable data on the portion of the heat that escapes through a window in the form of radiation.

Opinions, thoughts and facts appreciated.

Views: 298

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Low E helps in summer when the sun is at a different angle.  The UV rays reflect differently then the winter, when the sun is lower.  Heat is better reflected in summer versus winter due to the angle of the sun during the seasons.  The solar gain in winter comes from the sun's angle allowing more UV/Heat in this way as well, since it is not reflected by the Low E as easily.  As far as Low E helping during cold months, the radiant heat form interior lighting gets a slight gain in heat by reflecting heat from the windows into the home.  Not in dangerous amounts, just enough to help a little in comparison to non Low E coated windows.  Interesting stuff.    There is a lot of information, sometimes too much for the consumer.  It is always best to do research from homeowner testimonials as well.  Great post by the way

-TONY

Denver Window Replacement

So much of this depends on the size and orientation of the window.  North-facing picture windows are more common than one would suspect, and with our high altitude dark nights, you can really feel the "suck" from the night sky.

New Mexico has adapted the IECC to be more "passive solar friendly."

http://www.emnrd.state.nm.us/ECMD/FORMS/SolarWorksheet.xlt makes it relatively simple for a building official sign off on a design.

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

Profile IconMichael Sumpter and Bill Gartner joined Home Energy Pros
8 hours ago
Malcolm Jackson joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
12 hours ago
Amber Vignieri liked tedkidd's discussion What if more efficient homes were actually worth more?
15 hours ago
Amber Vignieri posted a blog post
16 hours ago
Eric Kjelshus replied to Rob Madden, Solar Home Broker's discussion Indoor Air Quality Monitors and Meters
"I have been using air advice for 5 yr or so - I end up with a report in 35 min I can e-mail or show…"
17 hours ago
Profile IconShane Matteson, Jay Cooper and Mike Harris joined Home Energy Pros
yesterday
Kim Burnett commented on Diane Chojnowski's group Home Energy Pros on Twitter
"Good morning, would you please add me. Thank you. Kim Burnett A+ Abundant Energy Experts"
yesterday
Kim Burnett joined Diane Chojnowski's group
Thumbnail

Home Energy Pros on Twitter

We've created a twitter list of members of Home Energy Pros who tweet about home performance and…See More
yesterday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service