It is my understanding that you need an airtight envelope (let's say less than or equal to 0.6 ACH) along with super insulation (whatever R value you need) for best energy performance. However, a building science specialist in charge of energy efficiency in Berkeley states that air tightness is (1) not important and (2) would make a house feel uncomfortable (even after a HRV/ERV system). I would like to invite professionals (building scientists, energy experts) to evaluate these views. As a non expert myself, I would like to know the truth.

Thank you!

Views: 982

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Kaushal, that is the typical ignorant place we all came from.  Given your account of the conversation, the extent of her expertise may be she bought a hat that says "energy expert" on it.  I doubt she's ever been involve in measured comprehensive home performance: http://bit.ly/rickchitwood

Hopefully she will learn as we have that insulation without air sealing often increases problems, and in fact insulation in your mild climate is the item to place less emphasis on.  Energy Efficiency isn't a product, it's a system of interconnected systems that need to be in elegant balance.  

Remember, hot goes to cold and the bigger the delta the faster the transfer.  Conversely, the smaller the delta, the slower the transfer.  More insulation to slow an already slow transfer is putting efforts in the wrong place.

Thermal mass actually works to advantage some.  Heat of the day making it's way in during cool nights.  And as others are alluding to - the tighter you get the enclosure the easier and less expensive IAQ control will be.   In San Fran you have brake dust everywhere.  Much of the time for you guys uncontrolled leaks do not mean fresh air.  The boat with lots of leaks needs lots of pumping, the boat with few needs little.

The problems I've seen with Oakland homes is leakage.  Open crawl spaces, doors you can fit bibles under, vented attics with no air seal at the thermal boundary.  Nate Adams has been writing some good stuff if you want to dig deeper:  http://bit.ly/NateonComprehesive

Passive Houses by definition do not need recirculation so "...avoid the recirculating units common in Passive Houses" gives a false impression. Extraction of air from kitchens and bathrooms is a standard feature of Passive House ventilation systens.

William, maybe I miscommunicated. In my personal experience (largely in the Bay Area PH projects), as well as from my observations from the larger PH community of homes (presentations on the topic by Katrin and W. Feist), the most common kitchen system is a combination of a recirculating kitchen range hood, with a low-level, continuous ERV/HRV inlet located in the kitchen ceiling at a flow rate of 30-35 cfm. Sometimes these systems have an optional boost for the ERV/HRV. Are you saying this is not the typical system? I have seen only one PH project that used a vented range hood. Either way, my point is that these systems are decidedly insufficient and much less effective than a vented range hood, and their installation could lead to unacceptable levels of combustion and/or cooking pollutants.  

Henry David Thoreau:

"I built my cabin in the woods on Concord Pond. Then I wrapped it with 18th century plastic(bakelite like). I then encased it outside and in with rushes and 18th century extruded polyurethane equivalent thicknesses. The roof, and under the floor, also. After an hour, I found that I could barely breathe a breath as though my head was under a blanket. so I proceeded to poke a six inch hole in the wall, and inserted an 18th century exchanger made of honeycomb. On the coldest night in 1847 I was able to make it throughout the night by shivering, without addition of heat from my little stove, which would've killeth me. Thereby did I invent the field which I annointed the Natural Philosophy of Cabin Making."

Not much you can say, H.D.T was the Man!

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

Profile IconJohn Doe and Ariston C. Hernandez Jr. joined Home Energy Pros
12 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"Bob, here is where our perspectives diverge. I think people should switch to electric because they…"
yesterday
tedkidd replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"Here our thinking falls out of alignment. Going to electric is default for me. People can't…"
yesterday
Bob Blanchette replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"If you are going to stay with gas service, might as well keep the gas water heater. Switching gas…"
yesterday
tedkidd replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"8 people, sometimes under 10 therms. Just not enough energy used heating water to get obsessive…"
yesterday
Eric Kjelshus replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"Biggest is to keep the CO  or other gas down in building  "
yesterday
Bob Blanchette replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"Look at your SUMMER gas bill where water heating accounts for most of your gas use. 10-15 therms…"
yesterday
Bob Blanchette replied to Damien Greenfield's discussion Is there is cost saving for you in having a tankless water heater?
"The marathon fails miserably in operating costs when compared to an ordinary gas water heater.. NG…"
yesterday

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service