Hi, All,

My normal territory is in Northern California, where it's hot and dry.  Recently, however, I helped with an evaluation in the tropics, where the temperature was regularly in the mid-80s, as was the relative humidity.  It was their winter.  One of the chief goals is to reduce electrical usage, which in turn means reducing the use of air conditioning.  Much of the load on the AC is to remove moisture, so it strikes me that one strategy is to limit moisture intrusion. 

But how do you determine how the moisture is entering?  Let's assume:
     1. We've performed blower door tests and know how much air leakage there is.
     2. There is no bulk water to deal with.
     3. Wherever possible, capillary breaks have been added.

One of the buildings I looked at is two story, slab-on-grade (with no moisture barrier and a high water table); walls are styrofoam blocks with concrete cores (essentially like our ICFs) and stucco cladding (no rain screen).  How do we determine what percentage of the moisture is due to infiltration; due to diffusion through the walls; diffusion through the slab?

And a follow-up question: if we were to treat the slab to block diffusion through the floor, would that increase the rate of diffusion in inaccessible areas, i.e. beneath the sole plates of the walls (several of the other buildings are slab-on-grade with wood frame construction)?

Thanks.  I look forward to hearing how you would go about analyzing this.

Bruce

Modify message

Views: 383

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Someone smarter than me could calculate the rate of vapor diffusion through the various materials you mention (such as the slab floor), given a few facts. I do think it would be worth exploring how much the slab might be contributing to interior moisture load, but I wonder if the primary issue is going to be air infiltration. What sort of blower door numbers were you getting? Unless these are well air-sealed, and the windows and doors are always closed, I would think that it's infiltration that you're fighting. 

Hi Bruce ad David,

The outside air, temp and humidity, sets a baseline for how low you can go without some form of powered mechanicals to remove moisture and or cool the space.  Even a tight house will need to exchange a lot of air to reduce further contribution from the house and occupants.

I'm sure some of the lab folks can tell us how to measure or calculate the moisture contribution from each source, but what comes to my mind is an extension of the old plastic square on the floor.  If you created a sealed insulated box, open on the bottom and taped it to the floor with a temp and humidity gauge inside (a logger would be better) and recorded the rise in humidity over a period of time, that curve would be interesting. 

As for reducing the moisture, most other contributors will have been well documented along with suggested solutions.  What are they currently doing that we may not be aware of?

Bud

Hi, David and Bud,

Thanks for your replies.  Full disclosure: I never performed a blower door test.  The island is in Fiji, and remote even by Fijian standards.  Also, the current is 220V.  So I wasn't able to arrange the transport of the right equipment.  I think you're right that air leakage is the major source of moisture intrusion, and the residents of the island have air sealed as best they can without the benefit of test equipment to guide the process.  I'm now working to get them a blower door and IR camera [know of any potential donors to a U.S. recognized non-profit?].

I've been told that diffusion is probably an insignificant source of moisture intrusion.  But there's this side to me that would like to be able to either verify or disprove this.  To gain a deeper understanding of moisture transport.  It may be, Bud, that your suggestion of using a sealed box is the most practical approach.  Curious to see what other responses we get.

Bruce

I have an approach for estimating air leakage using just a manometer.  Only slightly better than a wild guess, but so much of what we do is based upon guessing, a little more can only help. 

An option for a blower door might be Australia, they are well into energy efficiency and perhaps a rental or loaner.  A little closer.  Or, you could use what they have available over there and build your own, plywood, attic fan, and air flow meter.  I've always been a scrounge.

Bud

I think you could do a passable job with a box fan, an anemometer, and a manometer.

From his one email notice I just have spent the last 6 hrs. reading and downloading and printing out all that I can about moister removal. I live in central Virginia and the last 2 two weeks seen more condensation on exposed fiberglass bats than I care to talk about.  http://us-mg5.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=fhv8picl0ch0k

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

Chris Stratton replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"I like that idea. Giving people as many options to engage as possible (without overwhelming them)…"
2 hours ago
Colin Genge posted an event

Duct Testing 101 Webinar at Online

July 2, 2015 from 1pm to 2pm
•Testing for Energy Code or envelope performance •Measure a known hole to prove to yourself you and…See More
2 hours ago
John Proctor commented on Mariusz Chorazy's blog post Think Your AC Won’t Make it Through the Summer San Antonio TX? We’ve Got the Fixes
"Correction -- according to the most definitive study I know of the median life is 20.5 years. 63%…"
5 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Chris Another faster option in the interim could be to post a You-Tube video on how to use the…"
20 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Ted -  That is why the 1000 Home Challenge has two options for determining a project's…"
20 hours ago
Empower Efficiency added 2 discussions to the group Job Board
20 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Immediate verifiable won't work, this has been improved over 20 years..."
20 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Ted -  It is important to clarify that the OPTION B 1000 Home Challenge allowance comes out to…"
21 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service