Comment by Ed Mahoney 5 hours ago

Delete Comment

 

Does anyone know what EPA means by "Demolition".....  I am having a hard time with. If your going to demolish a wall area less than 6 sq ft, say to put in a wall sconce, would EPA say you need to be using Lead Safe work practices? I cannot find anyone willing to put that in writing, not even an email.....And I am a Certified Renovator and work for a certified firm..... Thanks....

Views: 18

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I got this from the EPA's FAQs:

Question (6725)
If a renovator removes less than 6 square feet of crown molding, is that considered demolition? Does it
matter whether the molding will be discarded, replaced with new molding, or reinstalled?
Answer
It depends on how the molding is removed. If a renovation activity removes or otherwise disrupts a
painted component in a way that destroys or ruins the component, the activity is a demolition.
Question (6739)
If I use a hammer to make a hole is a wall that is two feet on each side, does the RRP Rule apply?
Answer
Yes. Although making the hole disrupts less than six square feet of painted surface, using a hammer to
make the hole is demolition of the surface, so the minor repair and maintenance exception does not
apply. Making the hole using a cut-out technique that does not destroy the section of the wall that is
removed is not demolition, and the minor repair and maintenance exception would apply.

 

 

Their Renovation Repair and Painting FAQs are available here.

 

 

From an article I did this last April on this whole mess: http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-620-exemption-limits - the two main paragraphs that sum up the answer you are probably looking for...

As I have mentioned, in the prior article “25 Days to Go: RRP Work Practices – Clearing up some misconceptions” article, you cannot ignore the “or demolition” part. If you perform any demolition, you have just nullified the exemption. Unfortunately, the EPA did not define “demolition” anywhere in the regulation, so that also caused even more confusion. The 6/20 exclusion is basically confined to dismantling & reassembling the same components. Based on some of the EPA FAQ’s drilling holes or trimming wood you are fine. Now if you utilize a hammer to open up a hole, or remove crown molding so that is not reusable, you have tripped the demolition portion even if you fall under 6/20 portion....

Based on my reading, if the piece is being removed & you are reusing it, you are not doing demo work.  However, if you toss it or are replacing it with something different – I would opt to be on the safe side and follow the RRP regulations. Is that 6’ piece of plastic worth $37,500 and a permanent black mark?  

For more info on this, or other items concerning the RRP, I have a whole of articles located here - http://blog.sls-construction.com/rrp --- The one thing I will strongly urge everyone is to make sure you read the actual regulation & understand it.

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

John Proctor commented on Mariusz Chorazy's blog post Think Your AC Won’t Make it Through the Summer San Antonio TX? We’ve Got the Fixes
"Correction -- according to the most definitive study I know of the median life is 20.5 years. 63%…"
2 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Chris Another faster option in the interim could be to post a You-Tube video on how to use the…"
17 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Ted -  That is why the 1000 Home Challenge has two options for determining a project's…"
17 hours ago
Empower Efficiency added 2 discussions to the group Job Board
17 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Immediate verifiable won't work, this has been improved over 20 years..."
17 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Ted -  It is important to clarify that the OPTION B 1000 Home Challenge allowance comes out to…"
18 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"I agree Chris - that is where we need to end up. It may be possible to have the threshold…"
18 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Weigh in - Honorable Mention? 2nd Base? Half-Way There? 50% Better? On the Path? in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Just logged on and discovered Chris beat me to the response - Thanks Chris!  Here is my answer…"
18 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service