For those of you who are conducting residential energy assessments; are you recommending "on demand"  hot water re-circ. systems?  I'm finding that many of my customers waste a ton of water while they wait for the hot water to arrive. This is the case even with an insulated pipe because the water is simply wasted down the drain where as a properly configured re-circ system will return the water in the pipes to the water heater.  I recently became aware of a re-circ. system called Switch2o at www.switch2o.com that is enabled when the light switch in the room is thrown. It claims to waste only a cup of water and produces water saving far in excess of dual flush toilets. Thoughts?

Views: 505

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The issue is water is cheap in most parts of the country, a recirculating water system doesn't justify the payback time.

No offense Bob but this is the kind of thinking that has largely been responsible for the depletion of our natural resources.  Wouldn't you agree?

Definitely true.

Agreed. The big issue is natural resource prices have been subsidized by the government for years. Maybe not the water itself, but the electric and gas to heat the water have... At $3 per 1,000 gallons of water payback time on a $500 (installed) recirculation system is VERY long. There is a lot of "lower hanging fruit" in most homes that offers quicker payback times.

Navien has a fantastic condensing 98% efficient unit with a buffer tank AND pump, with internal recirc that can be programmed for when most likely needed AND can be connected to an external recirc loop.  That's the setup I'd recommend.  

I'm going to come to Bob's defense on this.  A recirc is for comfort and convenience.  The water saved is give up multi-fold in energy consumption. 

Is it worth $3-500, and additional BTU loss through a recirc, to save 1000 gallons a year?  

Is your house so good that that $300 couldn't save MORE resources if spent elsewhere?  

Hot water recirc is fairly common here. For some folks, it's a conservation issue because they have wells that don't produce much, so water down the drain is a problem. For others, it's a (usually) energy-wasting convenience that has the effect of conserving water, when what they really want is no wait time.

I'd say the majority of the systems I see are wasteful... over-sized pumps that run continuously, over-sized water heaters pushing water through over-sized, uninsulated lines that are too long. A small percentage are smart... a timer on the pump so that it only operates before/during breakfast and during/after dinner for short periods, an aquastat that turns the pump off if the water in the line is hot enough, short runs of well-insulated piping, etc. 

My brilliant top-secret invention is a faucet that doesn't start flowing water the second you move the handle--it recircs the water until hot water arrives, then it starts flowing. No wasted water, no recirc unless you're about to use water. All you have to do is get used to waiting a few seconds before using the water... which you're probabIy doing anyway. I should be a millionaire soon.

Make it look pretty and I'm sure you will sell some !!

That sounds pretty cool. 

There are plenty of "on-demand" systems out there that are fully integrated already - all you need to do is simply push a button & they stop as soon as hot water is detected - no need to buy a cobbled together "deluxe" system to get that. As for the savings, that depends a lot on the families usage, but most people don't require hot water when they turn on the bathroom light.

As for dependent savings your calculations are based on usage instead of operational costs.  It's all relative.

Switch2o has the cheapest operational cost of the on demand systems and probably similar to the button type. With the button, though you'll need a button at each station.  Also, I know you mean well but this is anything but a cobbled together system.  Perhaps you don't understand the configuration?

Ah ha - you know there is a big difference between "became aware" and I sell or offer... In case of "I now offer" you would have either gotten a private reply, a different worded reply, or none at all.

No it is not relative as it is dependent on a HO's needs, usage & their plumbing configuration. As for the cheapest operational costs - I highly doubt it, unless you have looked into every system out there & run the numbers. I dare say a vacuum switch that doesn't require electricity to start the pump is the most efficient. For the basic- for the thermostat shutoff, maybe but I doubt it - as for the pump, I highly doubt that the pump is the most efficient & cheapest to run unit out there.

A friend of mine set his up using a motion sensor in the bathroom... the pump starts anytime you set a foot inside the room. 

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Tom Conlon's discussion was featured

Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?

I just searched this forum for "Whole House Fan", but I didn't find much about them (except …See More
24 minutes ago
Tom White shared Brandon Walton's blog post on Twitter
28 minutes ago
Brandon Walton's blog post was featured

12 Things Every Home Performance Contractor Should Have on Their Work Truck

Every home is unique and differs from the last. It would be a perfect world (from a project…See More
28 minutes ago
Griffin Hagle replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
1 hour ago
Griffin Hagle replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Kurt, Whoops, looks like I got my links mixed up. Thanks for pointing that out. Here's the…"
2 hours ago
Kurt Shafer replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Glen,  I went to Homepower.com and did a search for whole house fan. Could not find that…"
2 hours ago
Glen Gallo replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"I no longer have my subscription to the Home Power Magazine but these figures were pulled from the…"
2 hours ago
Kurt Shafer replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Glen,  I read your blog with some interest.  You say  " Per the Home…"
3 hours ago
tedkidd commented on Scott Mellberg's blog post Lessons from Energy Efficiency Advisors: Getting Homeowners Onboard with Home Performance
"OMG, you are one of those myopic thinkers are you? Others do it better therefore drastic action is…"
3 hours ago
Glen Gallo replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"I do not like them and I am in Southern California. I think the whole house fan in prescriptive…"
3 hours ago
Kurt Shafer replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Griffin,  Is this really the link you…"
4 hours ago
Kurt Shafer replied to Tom Conlon's discussion Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?
"Tom, great new post! Thank you for the focus. As you know, the term "whole house fan" is…"
4 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service