Hey Home Energy Pro's!

Tim Reynolds here in Des Moines Iowa, I have been able to work with a group here that is trying out a hot roof system in a remodel. Now I can get behind the air sealing properties and understand that the foam has a high r value per inch, but there are a few problems that I am concerned about. 

1. The SP-Foam contractors didn't completely seal the roof decking, thermal bridging is occurring and some wicked ice dams have been created.

2. From what I understand here in Iowa we recommend around R-40/R-60 within the attic space,(after an air barrier is installed) with the foam only covering the decking say 3.5 inches  given that the foam R value is true 6.5 we will only have around a R-22 with a great air seal.

3. The stack effect is still in play with the attic now sitting at a average temp of 62 - 65 degrees (wouldn't we want the heat within the living space?) 

4. What if any concerns should I consider if I bring the air barrier from the roof to the attic floor? What if additional insulation is added upon the floor to bring the attic system to a proper r - value?

Thanks for any assistance.

Views: 2622

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

#1 - it is not a properly done hot roof, the sheathing should have all been sprayed / covered & even the joists

#2 - truthfully you can get less than code minimums when done right, but you should have at least 6" total or at least a 36 - 42

#3 - stack effect is meaningless - you will generally end up with the same or reduced heating & cooling loads with a hot roof system especially if you have any mechanicals in the attic

#4 - the air barrier essentially becomes the foam, but you should still air seal between the living & semi-conditioned spaces (you did remove the attic floor insulation right?)

http://bit.ly/HotRoof

Hey Sean,

Thanks for the response!  I was called into this project after the fact to touch up leaks from SP Foam contractors. 

1. Kind of what I was thinking

2. R-36/ R-42 would be reasonable, but I feel R-22 is too low for our zone. 

3. Maybe stack effect wasn't what I wanted to use there, but you're #4 is more what I was looking for 

4. Yes all existing insulation was removed this was a complete gut and renovation. 

In the above article it states that the attic floor should be sealed to help prevent the spread of fire, and not typically for air sealing - I guess my next question is why would we allow the heat transfer into the attic and not try and keep it within the conditioned living space? 

Thanks 

-Tim

It isn't going to be easy to fix this, problems as Sean noted.  I see two approaches.

1.  Bring the spray foam contractors back and double what they installed and as Sean stated cover the rafters completely.  Check local codes to see if a fire barrier is required.

2.  Abandon the foam on the roof deck and move the air barrier and insulation to the ceiling below.  BUT, you would need to ventilate the attic space as would normally be done.

The problem with just adding insulation to the attic floor is lowering the temperature of the foam above, along with trapping the moisture as it migrates up there.  Even closing off rooms on the second floor of home can result in a mild farm.

A third approach might be to fill out the rafters with other insulation and then apply a layer of rigid foam over the exposed bottoms of the rafters, but there are guidelines for this which I don't have at my finger tips.

The bottom line is to only use a hot roof where absolutely necessary.  In southern climates with mechanical equipment and ducts in the attic, it is necessary.  In a northers climate it is most often less expensive and better to leave the attic as an attic.

Bud

Thanks Bud!!

I think having the foam guys back will ultimately be the best solution. What are your thoughts about sealing the attic floor?

Thanks -Tim

All openings that allow a fire to spread need to be sealed with a fire rated product.  Large bypasses are of course a priority.  One of the issues with a hot roof is the conditioning of the resulting space.  Often they are called semi-conditioned, but some heat and air exchange with the house below is preferred.  Yes, that attic space will get warm, but that ensures that no condensation will form.  Circulating some of the conditioned air from the house controls the humidity.

Bud

I got to say Bud has nailed most of it BUT... in a cold climate a hot roof is still a great option especially for those with cut up roofs, or ones where you cant get full depth out to the edge of the wall sheathing, or you want a higher performing structure

As for the "but all the heat loss" - you are thinking volume & not actual heat loss - air is an amazing conductor, easy to heat & cool, but rarely where you lose or gain heat - most comes from the shell & components - you also got to remember that semi-conditioned crawl & attic spaces are great buffer spaces

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

Profile IconAshley Noreuil, Fred Smith and Peter Moncada joined Home Energy Pros
2 hours ago
George Matthews commented on George Matthews's event Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop
"Here is the flyer for the Advanced Techniques and Tools in Home Performance Friday October 7th at…"
14 hours ago
George Matthews posted an event

Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop at Truitt and White Lumber Conference Room

October 7, 2016 from 9am to 1pm
Building Energy Performance Testing is sponsoring the Proof is Possible Tour to come to the San…See More
15 hours ago
George Matthews replied to George Matthews's discussion Shortridge 8400 Flowhood for A/C airflow testing in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Here are the pics of the flowhood and airdata manometer"
Saturday
Sarah Holloway posted a photo
Friday
Joe Urycki added a discussion to the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
Thumbnail

TEC blower door and UEI combustion analyzer for sale

For sale is one used TEC Minneapolis blower door system: Includes model 3 fan with rings A and B,…See More
Friday
John Nicholas replied to Kevin Emerson's discussion Studies re: radon mitigation and energy efficiency
"The Nay side is well represented with the links already posted. I presented a neutral side, with…"
Friday
Ray Lehman replied to Kevin Emerson's discussion Studies re: radon mitigation and energy efficiency
"Hey John, Thanks for the information.  Very good empirical data. While I agree that running…"
Friday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service