Last week I was doing a rough-in w/air handler installed duct test.  I taped all the supply boots and installed the fan to the return grill just as always. When I set up the manometer, I noticed a pressure reading of 135Pa, this without the fan being turned on.  If I disconnected the hose from the manometer, pressure fell to zero.  Assuming I had done something to cause this I checked and rechecked everything, even installed fresh batteries.  Finally, I moved the hose to another supply boot, this resulted in a proper reading so I went ahead with the test.

Does anyone have any idea what was going on to give such a reading?  Let me know if you need more information.  Thanks for help solving this perplexing question.

Views: 327

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hard to see how there could be +135 in one supply duct without at least some positive reading everywhere else. Maybe someone accidentally (?) tied a bath fan into that duct.......

No power to the house at time of testing.

someone stepping on the hose?


I would tend to agree with Glen, as a blocked tube will clock up rather fast.  If there is still a pin hole I suspect the pressure would stabilize at some point, although I'm not going to test it.  It could have been a kink somewhere that unfolded when you moved the hoses.  If it was a positive pressure the block was on the input.  If negative it would have been on the reference, DG700 at least.


I just submitted this to the Energy Conservatory.  If I get something useful back from them, I'll post it here.

As promised, I asked the folks at The Energy Conservatory about my funky duct test results.  Paul Morin, a Technical Sales Specialist suggested that such a situation could occur if the hose is stopped up or perhaps was up against insulation in the supply boot.  He went on to say; "You can simulate a pressure this high by putting your finger over an open tap on the DG-700 gauge.  It is harder to reproduce a pressure that high with a long length of hose attached, but you would see pressures that high if some debris is plugging the hose.  You also will see pressures that high if the hose is pinched, stepped on or if there is water in the hose."  

I believe that the end of the metal probe must have been up against the boot insulation, probably when I taped the hose  to secure it. The resulting restriction of air caused the errant reading.

Thanks to everyone who offered a suggestion.  

Something else to look out for.  If you use the metal probe to punch through the plastic tape you can actually punch a hole in the plastic tape which will cover the end of the probe.  I've had this happen to me and it caused some temporary confusion.


Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

Walter Ahlgrim replied to Rod Fox's discussion Utility Meter Accuracy
"The more I think about it if the problem cannot be the current transformers reading small loads,…"
2 hours ago
Dennis Heidner replied to Rod Fox's discussion Utility Meter Accuracy
"Note to readers 0.5A instead of 5A for reading with A/D.... the edit to correct that didn't…"
3 hours ago
Dennis Heidner replied to Rod Fox's discussion Utility Meter Accuracy
"Rod, I have some of the CT's that you referenced in the openenergymonitor system.  They…"
4 hours ago
Tauran Ivall replied to Tauran Ivall's discussion Energy Efficient Entry Door options out there?
"Graham, How did this Plasproinc door cost?  Do you have any photos you can share a link to?"
4 hours ago
Dennis Heidner replied to Rod Fox's discussion Utility Meter Accuracy
"1200A service... really?  or did you mean 200A.  That size service would likely result in…"
5 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Rod Fox's discussion Utility Meter Accuracy
"That's great news! Guess that means there are a bunch of blower doors getting used in Jackson…"
6 hours ago
Ben Haas replied to Rod Fox's discussion Utility Meter Accuracy
"Teton County and the Town of Jackson Adopted the 2014 IRC energy code.... With that, inspectors now…"
6 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Rod Fox's discussion Utility Meter Accuracy
"Lol. Bigger is better, and better to have more than you need? My Aunt and Uncle put two central…"
7 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service